Gianluca Ciancaleoni

Dr. Gianluca Ciancaleoni

Dipartimento di Chimica e Chimica Industriale (DCCI) Università di Pisa Via Giuseppe Moruzzi, 13 - 56124 Pisa, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 October 2007 in Chemical Society Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMAlceo Macchioni
Alceo Macchioni
Gianluca CiancaleoniGianluca Ciancaleoni
Gianluca Ciancaleoni
CZCristiano Zuccaccia
Cristiano Zuccaccia
Daniele ZuccacciaDaniele Zuccaccia
Daniele Zuccaccia
This tutorial review deals with the methodological procedures that can be used to obtain accurate molecular sizes in solution from diffusion NMR spectroscopy. The critical aspects associated with the estimation of the size of molecules from the measured translational self-diffusion coefficient, using the Stokes–Einstein equation, are highlighted and discussed. From a theoretical point of view, it is shown how to take into account the size of the solute with respect to that of the solvent and its non-spherical shape using the appropriate correction factors in the frictional coefficient. From a practical point of view, the advantages of introducing an internal standard in the sample are presented. Initially, non-aggregating systems are considered in an attempt to clarify what hydrodynamic dimensions mean. Successively, aggregating systems are addressed showing how it is possible to understand the aggregation level and derive the thermodynamic parameters for some illustrative aggregation processes.

26 October 2015 in Chemical Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GBGiovanni Bistoni
Giovanni Bistoni
SRSergio Rampino
Sergio Rampino
NSNicola Scafuri
Nicola Scafuri
Gianluca CiancaleoniGianluca Ciancaleoni
Gianluca Ciancaleoni
Daniele ZuccacciaDaniele Zuccaccia
Daniele Zuccaccia
FTFrancesco Tarantelli
Francesco Tarantelli
The CO stretching response upon coordination to a metal M to form [(L)nM(CO)]m complexes (L is an auxiliary ligand) is investigated in relation to the σ donation and π back-donation components of the M–CO bond and to the electrostatic effect exerted by the ligand–metal fragment. Our analysis encompasses over 30 carbonyls, in which the relative importance of donation, back-donation and electrostatics are varied either through the ligand in a series of [(L)Au(CO)]0/+ gold(I) complexes, or through the metal in a series of anionic, neutral and cationic homoleptic carbonyls. Charge-displacement analysis is used to obtain well-defined, consistent measures of σ donation and π back-donation charges, as well as to quantify the σ and π components of CO polarization. It is found that all complexes feature a comparable charge flow of σ symmetry (both in the M–CO bonding region and in the CO fragment itself), which is therefore largely uncorrelated to CO response. By contrast, π back-donation is exceptionally variable and is found to correlate tightly with the change in CO bond distance, with the shift in CO stretching frequency, and with the extent and direction (C → O or C ← O) of the CO π polarization. As a result, we conclusively show that π back-donation can be an important bond component also in non-classical carbonyls and we provide the framework in which the spectroscopic data on coordinated CO can be used to extract quantitative information on the π donor properties of metal–ligand moieties.

28 October 2010 in Chemical Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASArianna Savini
Arianna Savini
GBGianfranco Bellachioma
Gianfranco Bellachioma
Gianluca CiancaleoniGianluca Ciancaleoni
Gianluca Ciancaleoni
CZCristiano Zuccaccia
Cristiano Zuccaccia
Daniele ZuccacciaDaniele Zuccaccia
Daniele Zuccaccia
AMAlceo Macchioni
Alceo Macchioni
We report on three Ir(III) molecular catalysts for water oxidation: 1, [Cp*Ir(ppy)Cl]; 2, [Cp*Ir(bzpy)NO3]; 3, [Cp*Ir(H2O)3](NO3)2. 2 and 3 are water-soluble and show a long-term activity ca. 2 and 3 times higher than 1. It is remarkable that 3, having the simplest structure, is the catalyst with the highest activity.

18 December 2014 in ACS Catalysis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Gianluca CiancaleoniGianluca Ciancaleoni
Gianluca Ciancaleoni
Leonardo BelpassiLeonardo Belpassi
Leonardo Belpassi
Daniele ZuccacciaDaniele Zuccaccia
Daniele Zuccaccia
FTFrancesco Tarantelli
Francesco Tarantelli
PBPaola Belanzoni
Paola Belanzoni

24 December 2013 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LRLuca Rocchigiani
Luca Rocchigiani
Gianluca CiancaleoniGianluca Ciancaleoni
Gianluca Ciancaleoni
CZCristiano Zuccaccia
Cristiano Zuccaccia
AMAlceo Macchioni
Alceo Macchioni

1 November 2008 in Coordination Chemistry Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGianfranco Bellachioma
Gianfranco Bellachioma
Gianluca CiancaleoniGianluca Ciancaleoni
Gianluca Ciancaleoni
CZCristiano Zuccaccia
Cristiano Zuccaccia
Daniele ZuccacciaDaniele Zuccaccia
Daniele Zuccaccia
AMAlceo Macchioni
Alceo Macchioni