Park SB, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2019 Feb;20(2):246-255. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0109

Background: We investigated patterns of failure in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) according to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) timing: pre-operative versus post-operative. Also, patterns of failure, particularly distant metastasis (DM), were analyzed according to tumor location within the rectum. Methods: In total, 872 patients with LARC who had undergone concurrent CRT and radical surgery between 2001 and 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. Concurrent CRT was administered pre-operatively (cT3–4) or post-operatively (pT3–4 or pN+) in 550 (63.1%) and 322 (36.9%) patients, respectively. Median follow-up period was 86 (range, 12–133) months for 673 living patients. Local recurrence (LR) was defined as any disease recurrence within the pelvis, and any failure outside the pelvis was classified as a DM. Only the first site of recurrence was scored. Results: In total, 226 (25.9%) patients developed disease recurrence. In the pre-operative CRT group, the incidences of isolated LR, combined LR and DM, and isolated DM were 17, 21, and 89 patients, respectively. In the post-operative CRT group, these incidences were 8, 15, and 76 patients, respectively. LR within 2 years constituted 44.7% and 60.9% of all LRs in the pre-operative and post-operative CRT groups, respectively. Late (> 5 years) LR comprised 13.2% and 4.3% of all LRs in the pre-operative and post-operative CRT groups, respectively. The lung was the most common DM site (108/249, 43.4%). Lung or para-aortic lymph node metastasis developed more commonly from low-to-mid rectal tumors while liver metastasis developed more commonly from upper rectal tumors. Lung metastasis occurred later than liver metastasis (n = 54; 22.6 ± 15.6 vs. 17.4 ± 12.1 months; P = 0.035). Conclusions: This study showed that LARC patients receiving pre-operative CRT tended to develop late LR more often than those receiving post-operative CRT. Further extended follow-up than is conventional may be necessary in LARC patients who are managed with optimized multimodal treatments, and the follow-up strategy may need to be individualized according to tumor location within the rectum.

Lee SM, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2025 Jul;26(7):638-649. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2025.0118

This study aimed to assess the technical performance of ElastQ Imaging compared with ElastPQ and to investigate the correlation between liver stiffness (LS) values obtained using these two techniques. This retrospective study included 249 patients who underwent LS measurements using both ElastPQ and ElastQ Imaging equipped on the same machine. The applicability, repeatability (coefficient of variation [CV]), acquisition time, and LS values were compared using the chi-square or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. In the development group, the correlation between the LS values obtained by the two techniques was assessed with Spearman correlation coefficients and linear regression analysis. In the validation group, the agreement between the estimated and real LS values was evaluated using a Bland-Altman plot. ElastQ Imaging had higher applicability (94.0% vs. 78.3%, P<0.001) and higher repeatability, with a lower median CV (0.127 vs. 0.164, P<0.001) than did ElastPQ. The median acquisition time of ElastQ Imaging was significantly shorter than that of ElastPQ (45.5 seconds vs. 96.5 seconds, P<0.001). The median LS value obtained using ElastQ Imaging was significantly higher than that obtained using ElastPQ (5.60 kPa vs. 5.23 kPa, P<0.001). The LS values between the two techniques exhibited a strong positive correlation (r=0.851, P<0.001) in the development group. The mean difference and 95% limits of agreement were 0.0 kPa (-3.9 to 3.9 kPa) in the validation group. ElastQ Imaging may be more reliable and faster than ElastPQ, with strongly correlated LS measurements.

Hong W, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2019 Apr;20(4):599-608. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.0557

Objective:To retrospectively evaluate the clinical, pathological, and imaging features of ovarian serous surface papillary borderline tumors (SSPBTs).Methods:Imaging features were analyzed, including the tumor size, laterality, tumor spread and the presence of ascites. Morphological nature (encased normal ovary, characteristics on MRI) and contrast enhancement (increased flow on Doppler US) were also evaluated. Clinical and pathological features, such as tumor markers (CA 125), treatment methods, outcomes on follow-up, and surgical staging, were analyzed.Results:Ten tumors in five patients were evaluated. Mean largest tumor diameter was 45 mm. All patients had bilateral involvement and ascites. 40% of all patients showed peritoneal implants. 20% of patients evaluated had lymph node metastasis. These patients showed grossly normal ovaries that were encased in or surrounded by irregular solid tumors. They had a mostly hyperintense papillary architecture with hypointense internal branching on T2-weighted MR ...