Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases that play a crucial role in extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling and are implicated in the pathogenesis of various cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Their dysregulation has been linked to atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and aortic stenosis, contributing to vascular inflammation, plaque destabilization, and adverse cardiac remodeling. Recent research highlights MMPs’ involvement beyond ECM degradation, influencing lipoprotein metabolism, inflammatory signaling, and intracellular processes critical for cardiovascular homeostasis. Despite their pathological role, MMPs remain promising therapeutic targets, with pharmacological inhibitors, gene therapy, and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) emerging as potential interventions. However, the clinical translation of MMP-targeting therapies remains challenging due to off-target effects and complex regulatory mechanisms. This review provides an updated synthesis of the molecular mechanisms, disease-specific roles, and therapeutic implications of MMPs in cardiovascular pathology, aiming to bridge the gap between fundamental research and clinical applications.

Atrial fibrillation, the most frequent arrhythmia in clinical practice and chronic coronary syndrome, is one of the forms of coronary ischemia to have a strong dual relationship. Atrial fibrillation may accelerate atherosclerosis and may increase oxygen consumption in the myocardium, creating a mismatch between supply and demand, thus promoting the development or worsening of coronary ischemia. Chronic coronary syndrome alters the structure and function of gap junction proteins, affecting the conduction of action potential and leading to ischemic necrosis of cardiomyocytes and their replacement with fibrous tissue, in this way sustaining the focal ectopic activity in atrial myocardium. They have many risk factors in common, such as hypertension, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia. It is vital for the prognosis of patients to break this vicious circle by controlling risk factors, drug therapies, of which antithrombotic therapy may sometimes be challenging in terms of prothrombotic and bleeding risk, and interventional therapies (revascularization and catheter ablation).

Branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), comprising leucine (Leu), isoleucine (Ile), and valine (Val), are essential nutrients vital for protein synthesis and metabolic regulation via specialized signaling networks. Their association with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) has become a focal point of scientific debate, with emerging evidence suggesting both beneficial and detrimental roles. This review aims to dissect the multifaceted relationship between BCAAs and cardiovascular health, exploring the molecular mechanisms and clinical implications. Elevated BCAA levels have also been linked to insulin resistance (IR), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), inflammation, and dyslipidemia, which are well-established risk factors for CVD. Central to these processes are key pathways such as mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling, nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activate B cells (NF-κB)-mediated inflammation, and oxidative stress. Additionally, the interplay between BCAA metabolism and gut microbiota, particularly the production of metabolites like trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO), adds another layer of complexity. Contrarily, some studies propose that BCAAs may have cardioprotective effects under certain conditions, contributing to muscle maintenance and metabolic health. This review critically evaluates the evidence, addressing the biological basis and signal transduction mechanism, and also discusses the potential for BCAAs to act as biomarkers versus active mediators of cardiovascular pathology. By presenting a balanced analysis, this review seeks to clarify the contentious roles of BCAAs in CVD, providing a foundation for future research and therapeutic strategies required because of the rising prevalence, incidence, and total burden of CVDs.

Landiolol is an ultra-short-acting, selective β1-adrenergic receptor blocker that was originally approved in Japan for the treatment of intraoperative tachyarrhythmias. It has gained attention for its use in the management of tachyarrhythmias and perioperative tachycardia, especially atrial fibrillation for both cardiac and non-cardiac surgeries. It can be the ideal agent for heart rate control due to its high β1-selectivity, potent negative chronotropic effect, a limited negative inotropic potential, and an ultrashort elimination half-life (around 4 min); moreover, it may have a potential therapeutic effects for sepsis and pediatric patients. Landiolol seems to be superior to other short-acting and selective beta-blockers such as esmolol. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of landiolol, a new ultra-short-acting β1 selective antagonist, including its pharmacology, clinical applications, efficacy, safety profile, and future directions in research and clinical data.

This article aims to analyze the relationship between non-obstructive coronary artery disease (NOCAD) and atrial fibrillation (AF), exploring the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and implications for clinical management. NOCAD and AF are prevalent cardiovascular conditions that often coexist, yet their interrelation is not well understood. NOCAD can lead to ischemic necrosis of cardiomyocytes and their replacement with fibrous tissue, sustaining focal ectopic activity in atrial myocardium. Atrial fibrillation, on the other hand, the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, is able to accelerate atherosclerosis and increase oxygen consumption in the myocardium, creating a mismatch between supply and demand, and thus promoting the development or worsening of coronary ischemia. Therefore, NOCAD and AF seem to be a complex interplay with one begets another.

Chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are prevalent cardiovascular conditions between whom there is a dual relationship, with significant morbidity and mortality. Recent studies have highlighted the roles of galectin-3 and pentraxin-3 as potential biomarkers in coronary atherosclerosis, yet their specific interactions and implications in patients with CCS and AF remain underexplored. This proof-of-concept study aimed to evaluate the levels of galectin-3 and pentraxin-3 in a cohort of patients with CCS and AF. A total of 131 patients diagnosed with CCS or/and AF were stratified based on coronary stenosis severity (significant, S-CCS and nonsignificant, N-CCS coronary lesions) and arrhythmia burden. Blood samples were collected to measure serum levels of galectin-3 and pentraxin-3 using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques. Clinical data, including demographic information, comorbidities, medication use, and biological markers of systemic inflammation, were recorded. The galectin-3 value was more than double in patients with S-CCS compared with those with N-CCS (17.39 ± 4.459 ng/mL versus 7.49 ± 2.732 ng/mL, p < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation was not associated with statistically significant variations in galectin-3 values, neither overall nor separately in the group of S-CCS or N-CCS. However, pentraxin-3 values were similar in S-CCS compared with those with N-CCS (2839.18 ± 1521.639 pg/mL versus 2564.07 ± 1299.055 pg/mL, p = 0.417). These values were lower in patients with sinus rhythm, with a mean of 2469.91 ± 1253.782 pg/mL, and steadily increased in those with paroxysmal, persistent, and permanent AF, for whom they reached a mean of 3162.87 ± 1893.068 pg/mL. Elevated levels of galectin-3 appear to correlate with coronary stenosis severity and may inform future strategies for risk stratification, patients’ selection for invasive coronarography or therapeutic targeting in CCS.