Since the discovery of insulin over 100 years ago, our understanding of the insulin signaling pathway has greatly expanded

Understanding the role of biased taste T1R2/T1R3 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) agonists on glycosylated receptor signaling may provide insights into the opposing effects mediated by artificial and natural sweeteners, particularly in cancer and metastasis. Sweetener-taste GPCRs can be activated by several active states involving either biased agonism, functional selectivity, or ligand-directed signaling. However, there are increasing arrays of sweetener ligands with different degrees of allosteric biased modulation that can vary dramatically in binding- and signaling-specific manners. Here, emerging evidence proposes the involvement of taste GPCRs in a biased GPCR signaling crosstalk involving matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and neuraminidase-1 (Neu-1) activating glycosylated receptors by modifying sialic acids. The findings revealed that most natural and artificial sweeteners significantly activate Neu-1 sialidase in a dose-dependent fashion in RAW-Blue and PANC-1 cells. To confirm this biased GPCR signaling crosstalk, BIM-23127 (neuromedin B receptor inhibitor, MMP-9i (specific MMP-9 inhibitor), and oseltamivir phosphate (specific Neu-1 inhibitor) significantly block sweetener agonist-induced Neu-1 sialidase activity. To assess the effect of artificial and natural sweeteners on the key survival pathways critical for pancreatic cancer progression, we analyzed the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal markers, CD24, ADLH-1, E-cadherin, and N-cadherin in PANC-1 cells, and assess the cellular migration invasiveness in a scratch wound closure assay, and the tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) in staging the migratory intercellular communication. The artificial and natural sweeteners induced metastatic phenotype of PANC-1 pancreatic cancer cells to promote migratory intercellular communication and invasion. The sweeteners also induced the downstream NFκB activation using the secretory alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) assay. These findings elucidate a novel taste T1R2/T1R3 GPCR functional selectivity of a signaling platform in which sweeteners activate downstream signaling, contributing to tumorigenesis and metastasis via a proposed NFκB-induced epigenetic reprogramming modeling.

Understanding the role of biased G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonism in receptor signaling may provide novel insights into the opposing effects mediated by cannabinoids, particularly in cancer and cancer metastasis. GPCRs can have more than one active state, a phenomenon called either ‘biased agonism’, ‘functional selectivity’, or ‘ligand-directed signaling’. However, there are increasing arrays of cannabinoid allosteric ligands with different degrees of modulation, called ‘biased modulation’, that can vary dramatically in a probe- and pathway-specific manner, not from simple differences in orthosteric ligand efficacy or stimulus-response coupling. Here, emerging evidence proposes the involvement of CB1 GPCRs in a novel biased GPCR signaling paradigm involving the crosstalk between neuraminidase-1 (Neu-1) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) in the activation of glycosylated receptors through the modification of the receptor glycosylation state. The study findings highlighted the role of CB1 agonists AM-404, Aravnil, and Olvanil in significantly inducing Neu-1 sialidase activity in a dose-dependent fashion in RAW-Blue, PANC-1, and SW-620 cells. This approach was further substantiated by findings that the neuromedin B receptor inhibitor, BIM-23127, MMP-9 inhibitor, MMP9i, and Neu-1 inhibitor, oseltamivir phosphate, could specifically block CB1 agonist-induced Neu-1 sialidase activity. Additionally, we found that CB1 receptors exist in a multimeric receptor complex with Neu-1 in naïve, unstimulated RAW-Blue, PANC-1, and SW-620 cells. This complex implies a molecular link that regulates the interaction and signaling mechanism among these molecules present on the cell surface. Moreover, the study results demonstrate that CB1 agonists induce NFκB-dependent secretory alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) activity in influencing the expression of epithelial–mesenchymal markers, E-cadherin, and vimentin in SW-620 cells, albeit the impact on E-cadherin expression is less pronounced compared to vimentin. In essence, this innovative research begins to elucidate an entirely new molecular mechanism involving a GPCR signaling paradigm in which cannabinoids, as epigenetic stimuli, may traverse to influence gene expression and contribute to cancer and cancer metastasis.

The concept of epigenetic reprogramming predicts long-term functional health effects. This reprogramming can be activated by exogenous or endogenous insults, leading to altered healthy and different disease states. The exogenous or endogenous changes that involve developing a roadmap of epigenetic networking, such as drug components on epigenetic imprinting and restoring epigenome patterns laid down during embryonic development, are paramount to establishing youthful cell type and health. This epigenetic landscape is considered one of the hallmarks of cancer. The initiation and progression of cancer are considered to involve epigenetic abnormalities and genetic alterations. Cancer epigenetics have shown extensive reprogramming of every component of the epigenetic machinery in cancer development, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, nucleosome positioning, non-coding RNAs, and microRNA expression. Endocannabinoids are natural lipid molecules whose levels are regulated by specific biosynthetic and degradative enzymes. They bind to and activate two primary cannabinoid receptors, type 1 (CB1) and type 2 (CB2), and together with their metabolizing enzymes, form the endocannabinoid system. This review focuses on the role of cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 signaling in activating numerous receptor tyrosine kinases and Toll-like receptors in the induction of epigenetic landscape alterations in cancer cells, which might transmogrify cancer metabolism and epigenetic reprogramming to a metastatic phenotype. Strategies applied from conception could represent an innovative epigenetic target for preventing and treating human cancer. Here, we describe novel cannabinoid-biased G protein-coupled receptor signaling platforms (GPCR), highlighting putative future perspectives in this field.

Background/Objectives: The significance of cytokine signaling on cancer progression and metastasis has raised interest in cancer research over the last few decades. Here, we analyzed the effects of three cytokines that we previously reported are significantly upregulated rapidly after the surgical removal of primary breast, colorectal, and prostate cancer. We also investigated the regulation of their cognate receptors. Methods: All experiments were conducted using the PANC-1, SW620, and MCF-7 cell lines, treated with three different cytokines (TGF-β1, HGF, and IL-6). The effect of these cytokines on the expression of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) cell surface markers and neuraminidase-1 activity was measured via fluorescent microscopy and image analysis software. Results: The findings show that these cytokines increase the expression of mesenchymal markers while reducing epithelial markers, corresponding to the EMT process. A strong link between cytokine receptor signaling and the Neu-1-MMP-9-GPCR crosstalk was identified, suggesting that cytokine receptor binding leads to increased Neu-1 activity and subsequent signaling pathway activation. Oseltamivir phosphate (OP) prevented sialic acid hydrolysis by neuraminidase-1 (Neu-1), leading to the downregulation of these signaling cascades. Conclusions: In concert with the previous work revealing the role of Neu-1 in regulating other glycosylated receptors implicated in cancer cell proliferation and EMT, targeting Neu-1 may provide effective treatment against a variety of malignancies. Most significantly, the treatment of patients with specific inhibitors of Neu-1 soon after primary cancer surgery may improve our ability to cure early-stage cancer by inhibiting the EMT process and disrupting the ability of any residual cancer cell population to metastasize.

Nonplatelet thromboxane generation, stimulated largely by oxidative stress, is a novel mortality risk factor in individuals with coronary artery disease. Though inversely associated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), a potential role in the pathobiology of heart failure (HF) remains poorly defined. Nonplatelet thromboxane generation and oxidative stress were assessed by measuring urine thromboxane-B₂ metabolites (TXB₂-M) and 8-isoPGF_2α by ELISA in 105 subjects taking aspirin and undergoing right heart catheterization for evaluation of HF, valve disease, or after transplantation. Multivariable logistic regression and survival analyses were used to define associations of TXB₂-M to invasive measures of cardiovascular performance and 4-year clinical outcomes. TXB₂-M was elevated (>1,500 pg/mg creatinine) in 46% of subjects and correlated with HF severity by New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class and brain natriuretic peptide level, modestly with LVEF, but not with HF etiology. There was no association of oxidative stress to HF type or etiology but a trend with NYHA functional class. Multiple invasive hemodynamic parameters independently associated with TXB₂-M after adjustment for oxidative stress, age, sex, and race with pulmonary effective arterial elastance (E_{a pulmonary}), reflective of right ventricular afterload, being the most robust on hierarchical analysis. Similar to E_{a pulmonary}, elevated urinary TXB₂-M is associated with increased risk of death (adjusted HR = 2.15, P = 0.037) and a combination of death, transplant, or mechanical support initiation (adjusted HR = 2.0, P = 0.042). Nonplatelet TXA₂ thromboxane generation is independently associated with HF severity reflected by invasive measures of cardiovascular performance, particularly right ventricular afterload, and independently predicted long-term mortality risk. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Nonplatelet thromboxane generation in heart failure is independently associated with risk of death, transplant, or need for mechanical support. Measurement of urine thromboxane metabolites using a clinically available assay may be a useful surrogate for invasive measurement of cardiovascular hemodynamics and performance that could provide prognostic information and facilitate tailoring of therapy in patients with heart failure. Inhibiting thromboxane generation or its biological effects is a potential strategy for improving cardiovascular performance and outcomes in heart failure.