Xiuming Zhang

Dr. Xiuming Zhang

Faculty of Science, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
+1
orcid
nitrogen management

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 January 2023 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BGBaojing Gu
Baojing Gu
XZXiuming Zhang
Xiuming Zhang
SLShu Kee Lam
Shu Kee Lam
YYYingliang Yu
Yingliang Yu
HGHans J. M. van Grinsven
Hans J. M. van Grinsven
DCDeli Chen
Deli Chen
Cropland is a main source of global nitrogen pollution1,2. Mitigating nitrogen pollution from global croplands is a grand challenge because of the nature of non-point-source pollution from millions of farms and the constraints to implementing pollution-reduction measures, such as lack of financial resources and limited nitrogen-management knowledge of farmers3. Here we synthesize 1,521 field observations worldwide and identify 11 key measures that can reduce nitrogen losses from croplands to air and water by 30–70%, while increasing crop yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) by 10–30% and 10–80%, respectively. Overall, adoption of this package of measures on global croplands would allow the production of 17 ± 3 Tg (1012 g) more crop nitrogen (20% increase) with 22 ± 4 Tg less nitrogen fertilizer used (21% reduction) and 26 ± 5 Tg less nitrogen pollution (32% reduction) to the environment for the considered base year of 2015. These changes could gain a global societal benefit of 476 ± 123 billion US dollars (USD) for food supply, human health, ecosystems and climate, with net mitigation costs of only 19 ± 5 billion USD, of which 15 ± 4 billion USD fertilizer saving offsets 44% of the gross mitigation cost. To mitigate nitrogen pollution from croplands in the future, innovative policies such as a nitrogen credit system (NCS) could be implemented to select, incentivize and, where necessary, subsidize the adoption of these measures.

5 November 2021 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BGBaojing Gu
Baojing Gu
Lin ZhangLin Zhang
Lin Zhang
RDRita Van Dingenen
Rita Van Dingenen
MVMassimo Vieno
Massimo Vieno
HGHans Jm Van Grinsven
Hans Jm Van Grinsven
MSMark A. Sutton
Mark A. Sutton
Little things matter: Particulate air pollution 2.5 micrometers or smaller in size (PM2.5) is a major cause of human mortality, and controlling its production is a health policy priority. Nitrogen oxides are an important precursor of PM2.5 and have been a focus of pollution control programs. However, Gu et al . now show that abating ammonia emissions is also an important component of PM2.5 reduction, and the societal benefits of abatement greatly outweigh the costs (see the Perspective by Erisman). Reducing ammonia emissions thus would be a cost-effective complement to nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide controls. —HJS

19 October 2017 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
XZXiuming Zhang
Xiuming Zhang
YWYiyun Wu
Yiyun Wu
XLXuejun Liu
Xuejun Liu
SRStefan Reis
Stefan Reis
JJJiaxin Jin
Jiaxin Jin
BGBaojing Gu
Baojing Gu

31 August 2020 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
XZXiuming Zhang
Xiuming Zhang
BGBaojing Gu
Baojing Gu
HGHans van Grinsven
Hans van Grinsven
SLShu Kee Lam
Shu Kee Lam
XLXia Liang
Xia Liang
DCDeli Chen
Deli Chen
Mitigating agricultural ammonia (NH3) emissions in China is urgently needed to avoid further damage to human and ecosystem health. Effective and feasible mitigation strategies hinge on integrated knowledge of the mitigation potential of NH3emissions and the associated economic costs and societal benefits. Here we present a comprehensive analysis of marginal abatement costs and societal benefits for NH3mitigation in China. The technical mitigation potential of agricultural NH3emissions is 38–67% (4.0–7.1 Tg N) with implementation costs estimated at US$ 6–11 billion. These costs are much lower than estimates of the overall societal benefits at US$ 18–42 billion. Avoiding unnecessary fertilizer use and protein-rich animal feed could provide 30% of this mitigation potential without additional abatement costs or decreases in agricultural productivity. Optimizing human diets with less animal-derived products offers further potential for NH3reduction of 12% by 2050.

1 November 2016 in Environmental Pollution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
YWYiyun Wu
Yiyun Wu
BGBaojing Gu
Baojing Gu
JEJan Willem Erisman
Jan Willem Erisman
SRStefan Reis
Stefan Reis
YFYuanyuan Fang
Yuanyuan Fang
XZXiuming Zhang
Xiuming Zhang
Urban air quality in China has been declining substantially in recent years due to severe haze episodes. The reduction of sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions since 2013 does not yet appear to yield substantial benefits for haze mitigation. As the reductions of those key precursors to secondary aerosol formation appears not to sufficient, other crucial factors need to be considered for the design of effective air pollution control strategies. Here we argue that ammonia (NH3) plays a - so far - underestimated role in the formation of secondary inorganic aerosols, a main component of urban fine particulate matter (PM2.5) concentrations in China. By analyzing in situ concentration data observed in major cities alongside gridded emission data obtained from remote sensing and inventories, we find that emissions of NH3 have a more robust association with the spatiotemporal variation of PM2.5 levels than emissions of SO2 and NOx. As a consequence, we argue that urban PM2.5 pollution in China in many locations is substantially affected by NH3 emissions. We highlight that more efforts should be directed to the reduction of NH3 emissions that help mitigate PM2.5 pollution more efficiently than other PM2.5 precursors. Such efforts will yield substantial co-benefits by improving nitrogen use efficiency in farming systems. As a consequence, such integrated strategies would not only improve urban air quality, but also contribute to China's food-security goals, prevent further biodiversity loss, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and lead to economic savings.

24 February 2022 in Nature Food
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ZZZhiping Zhu
Zhiping Zhu
XZXiuming Zhang
Xiuming Zhang
Hongmin DongHongmin Dong
Hongmin Dong
SWSitong Wang
Sitong Wang
SRStefan Reis
Stefan Reis
BGBaojing Gu
Baojing Gu