Chiara Paganelli

Dr. Chiara Paganelli

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2018 in Physics in Medicine & Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CPChiara Paganelli
Chiara Paganelli
BWB Whelan
B Whelan
MPM Peroni
M Peroni
PSPaul Summers
Paul Summers
MFM Fast
M Fast
GBG Baroni
G Baroni
High precision conformal radiotherapy requires sophisticated imaging techniques to aid in target localisation for planning and treatment, particularly when organ motion due to respiration is involved. X-ray based imaging is a well-established standard for radiotherapy treatments. Over the last few years, the ability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to provide radiation-free images with high-resolution and superb soft tissue contrast has highlighted the potential of this imaging modality for radiotherapy treatment planning and motion management. In addition, these advantageous properties motivated several recent developments towards combined MRI radiation therapy treatment units, enabling in-room MRI-guidance and treatment adaptation. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the state-of-the-art in MRI-based image guidance for organ motion management in external beam radiotherapy. Methodological aspects of MRI for organ motion management are reviewed and their application in treatment planning, in-room guidance and adaptive radiotherapy described. Finally, a roadmap for an optimal use of MRI-guidance is highlighted and future challenges are discussed.

31 August 2018 in Medical Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CPChiara Paganelli
Chiara Paganelli
GMGiorgia Meschini
Giorgia Meschini
SMSilvia Molinelli
Silvia Molinelli
MRMarco Riboldi
Marco Riboldi
GBGuido Baroni
Guido Baroni
Over the last few decades, deformable image registration (DIR) has gained popularity in image‐guided radiation therapy for a number of applications, such as contour propagation, dose warping, and accumulation. Although this raises promising perspectives for the improvement of treatment outcomes and quality of radiotherapy clinical practice, the variety of proposed DIR algorithms, combined with the lack of an effective quantitative quality control metric of the registration, is slowing the transfer of DIR into the clinical routine. Recently, a task group (AAPM TG132) report was published outlining the essential aspects of DIR for image guidance in radiotherapy. However, an accurate and efficient patient‐specific validation is not yet defined, and appropriate metrics should be identified to achieve the definition of both geometric and dosimetric accuracy. In this respect, the use of a dense set of anatomical landmarks, along with additional evaluations on contours or deformation field analysis, are likely to drive patient‐specific DIR validation in clinical image‐guided radiotherapy applications to account for geometric inaccuracies. Automatic and efficient strategies able to provide spatial information of DIR uncertainties and to evaluate monomodal and multimodal image registration, as well as to describe homogenous and un‐contrasted regions are believed to represent the future direction in DIR validation. But especially in the case of DIR applications for dose mapping and accumulation, the need of accurate patient‐specific validation is not only limited to the evaluation of geometric accuracy. In fact, the need to account for dosimetric inaccuracies due to DIR represents another important area in the field of adaptive treatments. Different approaches are currently being investigated to quantify the effect of DIR error on dose analysis, mainly relying on clinically relevant dose metrics, or on the study of deformation field properties for a voxel‐by‐voxel evaluation. However, novel research is required for the definition of dedicated and personalized measures capable to relate the geometric and dosimetric inaccuracies, thus bearing useful information for a safe use of DIR by clinical end users. In this paper we provide insights on DIR results evaluation on a patient‐specific basis, facing the issues of both geometric and dosimetric paradigms. Challenges on DIR validation are overviewed and discussed, in order to push preliminary clinical guidelines forward on this fundamental topic and boost the implementation of more robust and reliable patient‐specific evaluation metrics.

20 January 2023 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FPFRANCESCA PENNATI
FRANCESCA PENNATI
Alessandra AngelucciAlessandra Angelucci
Alessandra Angelucci
LMLetizia Morelli
Letizia Morelli
SBSusanna Bardini
Susanna Bardini
EBElena Barzanti
Elena Barzanti
Andrea AlivertiAndrea Aliverti
Andrea Aliverti
Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a medical imaging technique based on the injection of a current or voltage pattern through electrodes on the skin of the patient, and on the reconstruction of the internal conductivity distribution from the voltages collected by the electrodes. Compared to other imaging techniques, EIT shows significant advantages: it does not use ionizing radiation, is non-invasive and is characterized by high temporal resolution. Moreover, its low cost and high portability make it suitable for real-time, bedside monitoring. However, EIT is also characterized by some technical limitations that cause poor spatial resolution. The possibility to design wearable devices based on EIT has recently given a boost to this technology. In this paper we reviewed EIT physical principles, hardware design and major clinical applications, from the classical to a wearable setup. A wireless and wearable EIT system seems a promising frontier of this technology, as it can both facilitate making clinical measurements and open novel scenarios to EIT systems, such as home monitoring.

11 February 2018 in Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CPChiara Paganelli
Chiara Paganelli
DLDanny Lee
Danny Lee
JKJohn Kipritidis
John Kipritidis
BWBrendan Whelan
Brendan Whelan
PGPeter Greer
Peter Greer
PKPaul Keall
Paul Keall

18 January 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GBGiulia Buizza
Giulia Buizza
CPChiara Paganelli
Chiara Paganelli
EDEmma D’ippolito
Emma D’ippolito
GFGiulia Fontana
Giulia Fontana
SMSilvia Molinelli
Silvia Molinelli
GBGuido Baroni
Guido Baroni
Skull-base chordoma (SBC) can be treated with carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) to improve local control (LC). The study aimed to explore the role of multi-parametric radiomic, dosiomic and clinical features as prognostic factors for LC in SBC patients undergoing CIRT. Before CIRT, 57 patients underwent MR and CT imaging, from which tumour contours and dose maps were obtained. MRI and CT-based radiomic, and dosiomic features were selected and fed to two survival models, singularly or by combining them with clinical factors. Adverse LC was given by in-field recurrence or tumour progression. The dataset was split in development and test sets and the models’ performance evaluated using the concordance index (C-index). Patients were then assigned a low- or high-risk score. Survival curves were estimated, and risk groups compared through log-rank tests (after Bonferroni correction α = 0.0083). The best performing models were built on features describing tumour shape and dosiomic heterogeneity (median/interquartile range validation C-index: 0.80/024 and 0.79/0.26), followed by combined (0.73/0.30 and 0.75/0.27) and CT-based models (0.77/0.24 and 0.64/0.28). Dosiomic and combined models could consistently stratify patients in two significantly different groups. Dosiomic and multi-parametric radiomic features showed to be promising prognostic factors for LC in SBC treated with CIRT.

1 March 2015 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CPChiara Paganelli
Chiara Paganelli
MSMatteo Seregni
Matteo Seregni
GFGiovanni Fattori
Giovanni Fattori
PSPaul Summers
Paul Summers
MBMassimo Bellomi
Massimo Bellomi
MRMarco Riboldi
Marco Riboldi