Introduction: Chronic stress can interrupt personal life and cause fatigue, inability to concentrate, and irritability. This study aims to determine the prevalence of stress and its associated factors among medical students in Syria and whether social support could be a protective factor against stress. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the faculty of medicine of five Syrian universities. The Medical Student Stressor Questionnaire (MSSQ) was used to evaluate the stress caused by the possible sources of stress. And Social Support Questionnaire – short version (SSQ – short version) was used to assess the social support that medical students received from family, friends, and their fellow medical students using six questions. Results: A total of 1472 medical students participated in the study. Among the total participants, 671 (45.6%) were males, and 801 (54.4%) were females. The majority of the participators had mild (50.6%; n = 745) and moderate (37.0%; n = 545) stress levels. Academic-related stressors were the most important cause of stress among undergraduate medical students. Social support was provided equally to both genders, and genders reported the same degree of satisfaction. Conclusion: Our results emphasize the importance of improving the curricula, providing mental health consultants for students, and paying more attention to the mental health of female students. Finally, students in their clinical years should also receive mental health care, decreasing their duties and providing more self-free time.

Background. Osteoporosis is a progressive decline in the bone mass, which occurs with no alterations to the bone’s composition. It is associated with increased bone fragility that may eventually lead to fractures. In this study, we aim to assess the level of awareness that Syrian women possess regarding osteoporosis and spread the knowledge about its prevention measures. Methods. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Syrian Private University. A validated questionnaire was asked to be filled in by women aged 18 and above, who were presented to clinics at Damascus, Al Helal, and Al Zahrawi hospitals between 28 November 2021 and 5 March 2022. Results. 6082 women were included, of which 63.9% ( ) were under 30 years old and 89.3% ( ) were in their reproductive age. The average knowledge score of osteoporosis was (28-100); 88.1% correctly defined osteoporosis while the majority (93.4%) has heard of it. The majority of our participants were living in rural areas (77.2%; ) while only 22.8% ( ) were living in urban areas. The respondents from urban areas reported the highest knowledge scores ( ; 95% CI: 1.258-1.723; ). 75.60% agreed that aging is a risk factor for osteoporosis. 64.6% were aware that osteoporosis is directly responsible for hip fractures. Smoking, family history, lack of exercise, and menopause were the main risk factors for osteoporosis, at 53.6%, 53.1%, 84.6%, and 60.7%, respectively. Social media represented the ultimate source of information on osteoporosis (64.70%). Conclusion. Our study is the largest in the region and the first of its kind in the country. Syrian women had an average knowledge score regarding osteoporosis; the vast majority has defined it correctly and has heard of it. We found no statistical significance between age or educational level and adequate knowledge about osteoporosis.

Background and aim: Fear of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and its complications may result in stigmatization of individuals who may carry the virus. This is of special concern to healthcare workers who tolerate additional physical and emotional stress at times of pandemic. The aims of this study are to (1) develop and validate the COVID-19 Stigma Scale (COVISS-HCWs) survey; and (2) investigate the experience of stigma among healthcare workers possibly dealing with COVID-19 patients in five major public hospitals in Damascus, Syria.Methods: We divided the sample into two parts and then underwent EFA on the first 350 participants, dividing the 14 questions into two dimensions. Furthermore, CFA was conducted on the other 350 participants to confirm how correctly a hypothesized model matched the factor structure by EFA, as described above. Moreover, the coefficient of determination (R2) and item–scale correlations (standardized factor loading) were estimated to establish the acceptability of the final structure of the COVISS-HCWs. Through a cross-sectional study, a convenience sample of 700 healthcare workers participated in a self-administered questionnaire containing a section for demographic variables and another for newly designed COVISS-HCWs. The scale comprises 14 adapted and novel items that measure two subscales: feelings of perceived harm and inferiority, and avoidance. Descriptive statistics, reliability, and validity were evaluated.Results: The 14 COVISS-HCWs items were reduced to 11 items with a high Cronbach’s α of 0.909. A significant correlation was observed between the responses to each COVISS-HCWs item and the corresponding subscale, and between each subscale and the overall scale. Feeling stigmatized was reported by 9.86% of the participants. Younger age, low socioeconomic status, and higher intensity of contact with COVID-19 patients significantly correlated with higher stigmatization.Conclusions: The novel COVISS-HCWs is a reliable and valid tool to evaluate stigma among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Stigma prevalence among healthcare workers was 9.86%. Therefore, this must be addressed to prevent possible psychosocial and public health repercussions.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic emerged as an expected source of stress and anxiety as the healthcare workers had to work for long hours in close contact with infected patients, thus increasing the probability of medical errors and threatening the patients’ safety. This study aims to measure the levels of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and stress among Syrian healthcare workers and their quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in six central hospitals in Damascus, Syria. Data were collected from 1 to 30 June—2021. The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale—21 (DASS-21) was used to evaluate depression, anxiety, and stress among healthcare workers. Quality of life was assessed using the EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index. Results: A total of 700 participants were included in this study. 61.6% (n = 431) were males and 38.4% (n = 269) were females. Younger ages (18–29 years old) were significantly associated with higher levels of depression and stress (p < 0.0083). Female healthcare workers had higher significant levels of anxiety (p < 0.05). Significant anxiety and stress levels were reported when healthcare workers had contact with COVID-19 patients, even if they had protective equipment (p < 0.05). Half of the participants (50%; n = 349) reported a good quality of life. Conclusion: Stress levels and depressive symptoms were remarkably higher in healthcare workers of ages 18 and 29 years old, whereas anxiety levels were significantly higher and more severe in female healthcare workers. Moreover, direct interaction with COVID-19 patients was associated with higher levels of stress and anxiety symptoms.

COVID-19 ignited a global pandemic that, in Syria, further strained a nation and its healthcare system already ravaged by years of war and sanctions. The first case in Syria was reported on March 22, 2020, and this is the first study that aimed to describe the clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and prognosis of COVID-19 patients in Syria. Demographic and clinical data for this cross-sectional prospective study were collected on COVID-19 patients with positive polymerase chain reaction tests who were admitted to Al Assad and Al Mouwasat university hospitals between April 1 and January 31 of 2021. This study included 701 patients. The majority were over age 60 (59%) and male (67.9%). The commonest symptoms were fever (86.6%) and shortness of breath (75.6%). The commonest comorbidities were hypertension (53.9%) and diabetes mellitus (41.5%). On multivariable analysis, risk factors found to be significantly associated with poor outcomes were advanced age (≥60 years); male gender; high respiratory rate (>35); respiratory failure (PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio<100); heart failure; chronic lung disease; elevated white blood cell counts, lactate dehydrogenase, c-reactive protein; prolonged international normalized ratio; and low lymphocyte counts. The clinical outcomes of our patients were as follows: 59.2% improved and were discharged from the hospital, 3.5% were discharged with persistent symptoms and 37.2% died. Several biomarkers can serve as early warning and prognostic indicators of severe illness and mortality from COVID-19 in the highest risk patients, especially males with multiple comorbidities over 60 years of age. In the context of a national healthcare system stretched thin by years of civil war and sanctions, and high COVID-19 mortality rates as a consequence, extra care should be taken to use the predictive power of these biomarkers to stratify high-risk patients in the earliest possible stages of the disease to minimize severe illness and reduce fatalities.

Antibacterial resistance is an ongoing global issue, threatening the lives of millions and affecting the quality of health systems, resulting in high costs to the worldwide economy. Syria is one of many countries with a high rate of antibiotic prescription or consumption, even before the war. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the pattern of antibiotic prescribing with regard to acute upper respiratory tract infection (AURTI) cases throughout the year 2019; data were collected from GlobeMed Syria (now Modern Healthcare Claims Management Company) following ethical approval. The study comprised 14 913 cases, of which 13 382 (90%) had received an antibiotic prescription. All age groups showed high prescribing rates, with the 46-55 years age group having the highest (95.0%). Acute tonsillitis had the most significant percentage of antibiotics prescribed (98.7%). Cephalosporins were the most commonly prescribed antibiotic class. Family physicians were more inclined to prescribe antibiotics than those in other specialism groups. Syria has a high rate of prescribing antibiotics for AURTIs, which may contribute to the evolution of resistant bacteria. The rate is higher than those reported in other Arab countries. Physicians need to commit to following the official guidelines, taking the appropriate prescribing of antibiotics more seriously, and should take more care in distinguishing viral origins of AURTIs.