Jin Wu

Dr. Jin Wu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 March 2019 in Nature Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MHMengtian Huang
Mengtian Huang
SPShilong Piao
Shilong Piao
PCPhil Ciais
Phil Ciais
Josep PenuelasJosep Penuelas
Josep Penuelas
XWXuhui Wang
Xuhui Wang
IJIvan A. Janssens
Ivan A. Janssens

26 February 2016 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JWJin Wu
Jin Wu
LALoren P. Albert
Loren P. Albert
APAline Pontes-Lopes
Aline Pontes-Lopes
NRNatalia Restrepo-Coupe
Natalia Restrepo-Coupe
MHMatthew Hayek
Matthew Hayek
SSScott R. Saleska
Scott R. Saleska
Leaf seasonality in Amazon forests: Models assume that lower precipitation in tropical forests means less plant-available water and less photosynthesis. Direct measurements in the Amazon, however, show that production remains constant or increases in the dry season. To investigate this mismatch, Wu et al. use tower-based cameras to detect the phenology (i.e., the seasonal patterns) of leaf dynamics in tropical tree crowns in Amazonia, Brazil, and relate this to patterns of CO 2 flux. Accounting for age-dependent variation among individual leaves and crowns is necessary for understanding the seasonal dynamics of photosynthesis in the entire ecosystem. Leaf phenology regulates seasonality of the carbon flux in tropical forests across a gradient of climate zones. Science , this issue p. 972

9 March 2015 in Nature Geoscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KGKaiyu Guan
Kaiyu Guan
Ming PanMing Pan
Ming Pan
HLHaibin Li
Haibin Li
AWAdam Wolf
Adam Wolf
JWJin Wu
Jin Wu
ALAlexei I. Lyapustin
Alexei I. Lyapustin

20 September 2012 in Ecology Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSScott C. Stark
Scott C. Stark
VLVeronika Leitold
Veronika Leitold
JWJin Wu
Jin Wu
MHMaria Hunter
Maria Hunter
CCCarolina V. de Castilho
Carolina V. de Castilho
SSScott R. Saleska
Scott R. Saleska
Tropical forest structural variation across heterogeneous landscapes may control above‐ground carbon dynamics. We tested the hypothesis that canopy structure (leaf area and light availability) – remotely estimated from LiDAR – control variation in above‐ground coarse wood production (biomass growth). Using a statistical model, these factors predicted biomass growth across tree size classes in forest near Manaus, Brazil. The same statistical model, with no parameterisation change but driven by different observed canopy structure, predicted the higher productivity of a site 500 km east. Gap fraction and a metric of vegetation vertical extent and evenness also predicted biomass gains and losses for one‐hectare plots. Despite significant site differences in canopy structure and carbon dynamics, the relation between biomass growth and light fell on a unifying curve. This supported our hypothesis, suggesting that knowledge of canopy structure can explain variation in biomass growth over tropical landscapes and improve understanding of ecosystem function.

1 September 2017 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KGKaiyu Guan
Kaiyu Guan
JWJin Wu
Jin Wu
JKJohn S. Kimball
John S. Kimball
MAMartha C. Anderson
Martha C. Anderson
SFSteve Frolking
Steve Frolking
DLDavid Lobell
David Lobell

1 September 2019 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KMKatherine Meacham-Hensold
Katherine Meacham-Hensold
CMChristopher M. Montes
Christopher M. Montes
JWJin Wu
Jin Wu
KGKaiyu Guan
Kaiyu Guan
Peng FuPeng Fu
Peng Fu
Carl BernacchiCarl Bernacchi
Carl Bernacchi
Spectroscopy is becoming an increasingly powerful tool to alleviate the challenges of traditional measurements of key plant traits at the leaf, canopy, and ecosystem scales. Spectroscopic methods often rely on statistical approaches to reduce data redundancy and enhance useful prediction of physiological traits. Given the mechanistic uncertainty of spectroscopic techniques, genetic modification of plant biochemical pathways may affect reflectance spectra causing predictive models to lose power. The objectives of this research were to assess over two separate years, whether a predictive model can represent natural and imposed variation in leaf photosynthetic potential for different crop cultivars and genetically modified plants, to assess the interannual capabilities of a partial least square regression (PLSR) model, and to determine whether leaf N is a dominant driver of photosynthesis in PLSR models. In 2016, a PLSR analysis of reflectance spectra coupled with gas exchange data was used to build predictive models for photosynthetic parameters including maximum carboxylation rate of Rubisco (Vc,max), maximum electron transport rate (Jmax) and percentage leaf nitrogen ([N]). The model was developed for wild type and genetically modified plants that represent a wide range of photosynthetic capacities. Results show that hyperspectral reflectance accurately predicted Vc,max, Jmax and [N] for all plants measured in 2016. Applying these PLSR models to plants grown in 2017 resulted in a strong predictive ability relative to gas exchange measurements for Vc,max, but not for Jmax, and not for genotypes unique to 2017. Building a new model including data collected in 2017 resulted in more robust predictions, with R2 increases of 17% for Vc,max. and 13% Jmax. Plants generally have a positive correlation between leaf nitrogen and photosynthesis, however, tobacco with reduced Rubisco (SSuD) had significantly higher [N] despite much lower Vc,max. The PLSR model was able to accurately predict both lower Vc,max and higher leaf [N] for this genotype suggesting that the spectral based estimates of Vc,max and leaf nitrogen [N] are independent. These results suggest that the PLSR model can be applied across years, but only to genotypes used to build the model and that the actual mechanism measured with the PLSR technique is not directly related to leaf [N]. The success of the leaf-scale analysis suggests that similar approaches may be successful at the canopy and ecosystem scales but to use these methods across years and between genotypes at any scale, application of accurately populated physical based models based on radiative transfer principles may be required.