Federica Fraenza

Dr. Federica Fraenza


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 March 2024 in Pharmaceuticals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RRRosanna Ruggiero
Rosanna Ruggiero
NBNunzia Balzano
Nunzia Balzano
MNMaria Maddalena Nicoletti
Maria Maddalena Nicoletti
GMGabriella di Mauro
Gabriella di Mauro
FFFederica Fraenza
Federica Fraenza
ACAnnalisa Capuano
Annalisa Capuano
The recent introduction of the innovative therapy, onasemnogene abeparvovec (Zolgensma®), has revolutionized the spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) therapeutic landscape. Although Zolgensma® therapy has proven to lead to functional improvements in SMA children, some gaps in its safety profile still need to be investigated. To better characterize the Zolgensma® safety profile, we conducted a retrospective observational study, analyzing all the Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) referred to it and collected in the European pharmacovigilance database between 1 January 2019 and 22 September 2023. We found 661 ICSRs related to Zolgensma®, with a growing trend in the annual reporting. The majority of the reports were sent by healthcare professionals and referred to infant females. In more than 90% of the cases, Zolgensma® was the only reported suspected drug. Out of a total of 2744 reported ADRs, increased hepatic enzymes, pyrexia, vomiting, and thrombocytopenia were the most commonly reported adverse reactions. Of these adverse reactions (ADRs), 56.9% were serious, causing or prolonging the patient’s hospitalization. A total of 39 ICSRs related to cases with a fatal outcome. Alterations in the heart rhythm, acute hepatic failure, and hepatic cytolysis emerged among the cardiac and hepatic disorders, respectively.

16 March 2023 in Frontiers in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
RRRosanna Ruggiero
Rosanna Ruggiero
NBNunzia Balzano
Nunzia Balzano
RNRaffaella Di Napoli
Raffaella Di Napoli
FFFederica Fraenza
Federica Fraenza
CPCiro Pentella
Ciro Pentella
ACAnnalisa Capuano
Annalisa Capuano
Although the immunotherapy advent has revolutionized cancer treatment, it, unfortunately, does not spare cancer patients from possible immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can also involve the peripheral nervous system. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), blocking cytotoxic T-lymphocyteassociated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), can induce an immune imbalance and cause different peripheral neuropathies (PNs). Considering the wide range of PNs and their high impact on the safety and quality of life for cancer patients and the availability of large post-marketing surveillance databases, we chose to analyze the characteristics of ICI-related PNs reported as suspected drug reactions from 2010 to 2020 in the European real-world context. We analyzed data collected in the European pharmacovigilance database, Eudravigilance, and conducted a systematic and disproportionality analysis. In our study, we found 735 reports describing 766 PNs occurred in patients treated with ICIs. These PNs included Guillain-Barré syndrome, Miller-Fisher syndrome, neuritis, and chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. These ADRs were often serious, resulting in patient disability or hospitalization. Moreover, our disproportionality analysis revealed an increased reporting frequency of PNs with tezolizumab compared to other ICIs. Guillain-Barré syndrome is a notable potential PN related to ICIs, as it is associated with a significant impact on patient safety and has had unfavorable outcomes, including a fatal one. Continued monitoring of the safety profile of ICIs in real-life settings is necessary, especially considering the increased frequency of PNs associated with atezolizumab compared with other ICIs.

3 October 2022 in Frontiers in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AMAnnamaria Mascolo
Annamaria Mascolo
GMGabriella di Mauro
Gabriella di Mauro
FFFederica Fraenza
Federica Fraenza
MGMario Gaio
Mario Gaio
AZAlessia Zinzi
Alessia Zinzi
LSLiberata Sportiello
Liberata Sportiello
Introduction: Although the European Medicines Agency (EMA) encourage coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in pregnant women, the scientific evidence supporting the use of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy is still limited.Aim: We aimed to investigate adverse events following immunization (AEFI) with COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy.Methods: We retrieved Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) related to the use of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy from the EudraVigilance database for the year 2021. We analyzed AEFI related to the mother and fetus/newborn. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was computed to compare the reporting probability of spontaneous abortion between COVID-19 vaccines.Results: During the study period, among 1,315,315 ICSRs related to COVID-19 vaccines, we retrieved 3,252 (0.25%) reports related to the use in pregnancy. More than half (58.24%) of ICSRs were submitted by non-healthcare professionals. Although the majority (87.82%) of ICSRs concerned serious AEFI, their outcomes were mostly favorable. In this study, 85.0% of total ICSRs referred to pregnant women (n = 2,764), while 7.9% referred to fetuses/newborns (n = 258). We identified 16,569 AEFI. Moreover, 55.16% were AEFI not related to pregnancy (mostly headache, pyrexia, and fatigue), while 17.92% were pregnancy-, newborn-, or fetus-related AEFI. Among pregnancy-related AEFI, the most reported was spontaneous abortion. Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines had a lower reporting probability of spontaneous abortion than viral vector-based vaccines (ROR 0.80, 95% CI 0.69–0.93). Moderna and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines had a higher reporting probability of spontaneous abortion (ROR 1.2, 95% CI 1.05–1.38 and ROR 1.26, 95% CI 1.08–1.47, respectively), while a lower reporting probability was found for Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine compared with all other COVID-19 vaccines (ROR 0.73, 95% CI 0.64–0.84). In addition, 5.8% of ICSRs reported a fatal outcome.Conclusions: No strong insight of unknown AEFI associated with COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant women was observed. Considering the high risk associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, our analysis suggests that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy outweigh the possible risks. However, it is important to continue monitoring the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines in this subpopulation.

9 April 2025 in Pharmacological Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NBNunzia Balzano
Nunzia Balzano
RNRaffaella Di Napoli
Raffaella Di Napoli
FFFederica Fraenza
Federica Fraenza
DCDaniele Di Giulio Cesare
Daniele Di Giulio Cesare
OMOrnella Moreggia
Ornella Moreggia
LSLiberata Sportiello
Liberata Sportiello
Background: The treatment landscape for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has increased significantly over the past few decades, thanks to the introduction of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, and ponesimod belong to the newer generation of oral DMTs categorized as sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs). Because of their mechanism of action, they may increase the risk of lymphopenia, which could influence the therapeutic management of people with MS. The aim of this study was to describe and compare the reporting frequency of lymphopenia related to four S1PRMs. Methods: Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) were retrieved from the European spontaneous reporting system database (EudraVigilance) from January 1st, 2022, to December 31st, 2023. The reporting odds ratios (RORs) were computed to compare the reporting probability of lymphopenia between a S1PRM versus each other. Results: We retrieved 4017 ICSRs, of which 521 (13%) reported lymphopenia associated with fingolimod (53.3%), siponimod (38.4%), ozanimod (5.4%), and ponesimod (2.1%). The most common reporting source was the healthcare professional (94.2%), and more than half of the ICSRs (62.6%) reported serious lymphopenia. Fingolimod was associated with a lower reporting frequency of lymphopenia compared to siponimod. Both siponimod and fingolimod were associated with a higher reporting frequency of lymphopenia compared to ozanimod; siponimod also had a higher reporting probability in comparison with ponesimod. Conclusions: The most relevant clinical implication of the disproportionality analysis is to increase the awareness of the risk of lymphopenia related to these drugs, thus supporting proactive monitoring and optimizing treatment strategies for people with MS. Clinical trial number: Not applicable.