Raffaella Di Napoli

Dr. Raffaella Di Napoli

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
22 July 2023 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RNRaffaella Di Napoli
Raffaella Di Napoli
NBNunzia Balzano
Nunzia Balzano
AMAnnamaria Mascolo
Annamaria Mascolo
CCCarla Cimmino
Carla Cimmino
Antonio VitielloAntonio Vitiello
Antonio Vitiello
Mariarosaria BoccellinoMariarosaria Boccellino
Mariarosaria Boccellino
Chemotherapy represents the main pharmacological cancer treatment. Recently, positive effects emerged with the combination of anticancer therapy and nutraceutical products. The aim of this systematic review is to collect and synthesize the available scientific evidence regarding the potential effects of nutraceuticals on cancer cells. A systematic literature search of randomized clinical trials of nutraceutical products in patients with cancer published up to 15 December 2022 was conducted using three data sources: Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. The effect of high-dose isoflavone supplements on prostate cancer resulted in stabilization or reduction of PSA concentrations in 50% of isoflavone group patients six months after treatment. High doses of vitamin D supplementation plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer showed a median PFS of 13.0 months (95% CI, 10.1–14.7 months) for 49 patients. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on markers of inflammatory level and antioxidant capacity in women with breast cancer showed a significant increase in serum vitamin D concentration (28 ± 2.6 to 39 ± 3.5; p = 0.004) after 8 weeks of treatment. In conclusion, nutraceutical supplements represent a potentially growing sector and can be utilized in medical treatment or nutrition to provide integrated medical care.

4 May 2023 in Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RRRosanna Ruggiero
Rosanna Ruggiero
RNRaffaella Di Napoli
Raffaella Di Napoli
NBNunzia Balzano
Nunzia Balzano
DRDonatella Ruggiero
Donatella Ruggiero
CRConsiglia Riccardi
Consiglia Riccardi
ACAnnalisa Capuano
Annalisa Capuano
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represent an innovative therapeutic approach of oncologic diseases. In Europe, this therapeutic class currently includes eight agents: ipilimumab, pembrolizumab,...

9 April 2025 in Pharmacological Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NBNunzia Balzano
Nunzia Balzano
RNRaffaella Di Napoli
Raffaella Di Napoli
FFFederica Fraenza
Federica Fraenza
DCDaniele Di Giulio Cesare
Daniele Di Giulio Cesare
OMOrnella Moreggia
Ornella Moreggia
LSLiberata Sportiello
Liberata Sportiello
Background: The treatment landscape for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) has increased significantly over the past few decades, thanks to the introduction of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). Fingolimod, siponimod, ozanimod, and ponesimod belong to the newer generation of oral DMTs categorized as sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators (S1PRMs). Because of their mechanism of action, they may increase the risk of lymphopenia, which could influence the therapeutic management of people with MS. The aim of this study was to describe and compare the reporting frequency of lymphopenia related to four S1PRMs. Methods: Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) were retrieved from the European spontaneous reporting system database (EudraVigilance) from January 1st, 2022, to December 31st, 2023. The reporting odds ratios (RORs) were computed to compare the reporting probability of lymphopenia between a S1PRM versus each other. Results: We retrieved 4017 ICSRs, of which 521 (13%) reported lymphopenia associated with fingolimod (53.3%), siponimod (38.4%), ozanimod (5.4%), and ponesimod (2.1%). The most common reporting source was the healthcare professional (94.2%), and more than half of the ICSRs (62.6%) reported serious lymphopenia. Fingolimod was associated with a lower reporting frequency of lymphopenia compared to siponimod. Both siponimod and fingolimod were associated with a higher reporting frequency of lymphopenia compared to ozanimod; siponimod also had a higher reporting probability in comparison with ponesimod. Conclusions: The most relevant clinical implication of the disproportionality analysis is to increase the awareness of the risk of lymphopenia related to these drugs, thus supporting proactive monitoring and optimizing treatment strategies for people with MS. Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

23 March 2025 in Drug Safety
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RNRaffaella Di Napoli
Raffaella Di Napoli
CRChristophe Richez
Christophe Richez
CSCristina Scavone
Cristina Scavone
ASAllison Singier
Allison Singier
MDMaxime Demourgues
Maxime Demourgues
FSFrancesco Salvo
Francesco Salvo
Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is commonly treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) and anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNFα), but the cardiovascular safety profiles of these drugs remain unclear. Objective The aim of this study was to describe the individual case safety reports of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) or stroke and to determine whether there was a difference in the frequency of reporting of cardiovascular events between JAKis and anti-TNFα used in RA. Methods A case/non-case study was conducted using the WHO VigiBase® database. Descriptive analysis was performed, the time to onset (TTO) of MACE was calculated, and the reporting odds ratio (ROR) was used to estimate the frequency of MACE reports associated with JAKis versus anti-TNFα in RA. Results A total of 18,099 cases of MACE were identified, of which 2543 (14%) were associated with JAKis, predominantly in women (65.4%) and in patients aged ≥65 years (49.9%). The median time to onset was 210 days (IQR 60–510) for JAKis and 690 days (210–1460) for anti-TNFα. JAKis were associated with higher odds of reporting MACE (ROR 1.38 [95% CI 1.32–1.44]), mainly due to non-fatal stroke (1.65 [1.55–1.75]). Stroke as a whole showed similar results (1.62 [1.53–1.72]). The ROR of MACE was also slightly increased in patients aged <65 years treated with JAKis (1.29 [1.21–1.39]). Conclusions Compared with anti-TNFα, JAKis were more associated with MACE, especially stroke, and with a shorter time to onset. These data support the hypothesis of a different cardiovascular reporting frequency between JAKis and anti-TNFα. In patients with identified cardiovascular risk, anti-TNFα should be preferred to JAKis until more definitive results are available.

6 November 2023 in Pharmaceuticals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LSLiberata Sportiello
Liberata Sportiello
RNRaffaella Di Napoli
Raffaella Di Napoli
NBNunzia Balzano
Nunzia Balzano
AMAnnamaria Mascolo
Annamaria Mascolo
RRRosanna Ruggiero
Rosanna Ruggiero
ACAnnalisa Capuano
Annalisa Capuano
(1) Background: The purpose of study was to compare the safety profile of glatiramer with natalizumab, alemtuzumab and ocrelizumab in pregnant and lactating women affected by multiple sclerosis (MS). (2) Methods: Individual case safety reports (ICSRs) were retrieved from the European spontaneous reporting system database (EudraVigilance). The reporting odds ratios (RORs) were computed to compare the reporting probability of events between natalizumab, alemtuzumab and ocrelizumab vs. glatiramer. (3) Results: A total of 1236 ICSRs reporting at least one DMT as a suspected drug were selected. More adverse drug reactions (ADRs) unrelated to pregnancy and breastfeeding (n = 1171; 32.6%) were reported than ADRs specific to pregnancy and breastfeeding (n = 1093; 30.4%). The most frequently reported unrelated ADR was MS relapse. Alemtuzumab and natalizumab seem to have a lower reporting probability of MS relapse compared to glatiramer (ROR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07–0.45 and ROR 0.34, 95% CI 0.20–0.57). Among pregnancy- and breastfeeding-related ADRs, the first most reported event was spontaneous abortion (n = 321; 8.9%). Natalizumab and ocrelizumab were associated with a higher reporting probability of spontaneous abortion compared to glatiramer (ROR 2.22, 95% CI 1.58–3.12; ROR 2.18, 95% CI 1.34–3.54, respectively), while alemtuzumab had a lower reporting frequency (ROR 0.32, 95% CI 0.17–0.60). (4) Conclusions: This study did not suggest any strong or new insights for DMTs in this special subpopulation. However, further studies need to be performed.

11 April 2025 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FCFederica Colapietra
Federica Colapietra
PMPaola Della Monica
Paola Della Monica
RNRaffaella Di Napoli
Raffaella Di Napoli
FSFábio França Vieira e Silva
Fábio França Vieira e Silva
GSGiuliana Settembre
Giuliana Settembre
MDMarina Di Domenico
Marina Di Domenico
Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) comprise a heterogeneous tumor group arising from neuroendocrine cells, commonly originating in the gastroenteropancreatic tract and bronchopulmonary system. Their incidence has risen significantly, owing to improved diagnostic techniques and increased clinical recognition. While previous reviews have explored the molecular and genetic basis of NENs, limited attention has been given to the role of epigenetic modifications, particularly DNA methylation, in tumorigenesis and disease progression. This review focuses on lung, pancreas, and thyroid well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), highlighting epigenetic mechanisms, particularly DNA methylation, as promising biomarkers for early diagnosis and risk stratification. Aberrant DNA methylation can silence key tumor suppressor genes, including RASSF1A and CDKN2A, thereby promoting tumorigenesis. Integrating DNA methylation profiles with conventional biomarkers such as chromogranin A (CgA) may enhance diagnostic accuracy and inform therapeutic strategies. Emerging epigenetic therapies offer potential avenues for personalized treatment based on molecular profiling. Unlike prior reviews that broadly cover genetic and epigenetic changes in NENs, this review uniquely emphasizes the translational potential of epigenetic biomarkers in clinical practice. By synthesizing recent findings and evaluating their clinical implications, we aim to bridge the gap between molecular research and practical applications in diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy.