Kelly E. O’Connor

Dr. Kelly E. O’Connor

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 March 2021 in Animals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Shelby Elaine McDonaldShelby Elaine McDonald
Shelby Elaine McDonald
KOKelly E. O’Connor
Kelly E. O’Connor
AMAngela Matijczak
Angela Matijczak
CTCamie Tomlinson
Camie Tomlinson
JAJennifer Applebaum
Jennifer Applebaum
BZBarbara Zsembik
Barbara Zsembik
This cross-sectional study examined whether, and to what extent, attachment to pets was associated with changes in latent patterns of adults’ perceived mental health symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 1942). We used latent transition analysis to determine the stability of subgroup membership pre- and post-COVID and the effect of attachment to pets on transition probabilities. Mental health before COVID-19 was measured retrospectively. Five subgroups were identified: low symptoms, mild symptoms, moderate symptoms, high symptoms, and severe symptoms. Among individuals in the moderate and high symptoms subgroups, those who reported high attachment to pets generally had greater odds of transitioning to a less severe symptom profile (OR = 2.12) over time than those with low attachment to pets (OR = 1.39). However, those who had a severe symptom profile and high attachment to pets had lower odds of transitioning to a less severe symptom profile (OR = 0.30) and higher odds of maintaining a severe symptom profile (OR = 3.33) than those with low attachment to pets. These findings suggest that the protective and risk effects of attachment to pets differ based on individuals’ psychological symptom patterns across multiple indicators. We discuss the implications of these findings for research, policy, and practice.

1 December 2019 in Child Abuse & Neglect
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RHRoxanne Hawkins
Roxanne Hawkins
Shelby Elaine McDonaldShelby Elaine McDonald
Shelby Elaine McDonald
KOKelly E. O’Connor
Kelly E. O’Connor
AMAngela Matijczak
Angela Matijczak
FAFrank R. Ascione
Frank R. Ascione
JWJames Herbert Williams
James Herbert Williams

23 December 2020 in Behavioral Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AMAngela Matijczak
Angela Matijczak
Shelby Elaine McDonaldShelby Elaine McDonald
Shelby Elaine McDonald
CTCamie Tomlinson
Camie Tomlinson
JMJennifer L. Murphy
Jennifer L. Murphy
KOKelly E. O’Connor
Kelly E. O’Connor
LGBTQ+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual/gender minority identities) individuals frequently report exposure to microaggressions, which are associated with deleterious mental health outcomes. Social support from humans has been found to be an important protective factor for LGBTQ+ emerging adults. However, an underexplored area of research is the protective role of interactions with companion animals for this population. We conducted simple and multiple moderation analyses to explore whether and to what extent emotional comfort from companion animals and human social support moderated the relationship between LGBTQ-related microaggressions and depressive and anxiety symptoms. Our sample included 134 LGBTQ+ emerging adults (mean age of 19.31). We found that social support moderated the relationship between microaggressions and depressive symptoms. The relationship between microaggressions and depressive symptoms was not significant at high levels of social support, indicating the protective nature of human social support. Comfort from companion animals also moderated the relationship between interpersonal microaggressions and depressive symptoms. For participants with high or medium levels of emotional comfort from companion animals, interpersonal microaggressions were positively associated with depressive symptoms. Our results highlight the need to further investigate the complex role of relationships with companion animals on mental health outcomes for LGBTQ+ emerging adults.

11 October 2022 in Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KOKelly E. O’Connor
Kelly E. O’Connor
TSTerri Sullivan
Terri Sullivan
KRKatherine M. Ross
Katherine M. Ross
Carrying a handgun is an established risk factor for firearm violence, with detrimental and too often irreversible consequences for adolescents including injury and mortality. Although researchers identified a number of risk factors for adolescent handgun carriage, little is known regarding the role of strengths or developmental assets in buffering against risk. The goal of this study was to identify both risk and protective factors for handgun carriage among a predominantly African American (88%) community-based sample of adolescents ( Mage = 14.3) who resided in urban communities with high rates of poverty and exposure to violence. Consistent with prior work, we found that adolescents with access to a handgun or with friends who had carried a handgun had higher odds of carrying a handgun themselves in the past 3 months. Handgun access, friends’ handgun carriage, and beliefs supporting reactive aggression were identified as risk factors for handgun carriage. Although personal and social assets and positive outlook moderated these relations, the direction was contrary to our hypotheses. We believe that these findings are in part due to structural inequities and social norms impacting adolescents in urban communities characterized by concentrated poverty and high rates of violence. Our findings highlight the value of moving beyond a deficit-oriented framework to gain a more nuanced understanding of the dynamics among both positive and negative factors that alter risk for handgun carriage among African American youth living in low-income urban areas.

1 May 2022 in Psychology of Violence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AFAlbert D. Farrell
Albert D. Farrell
SPSarah K. Pittman
Sarah K. Pittman
KOKelly E. O’Connor
Kelly E. O’Connor
TSTerri Sullivan
Terri Sullivan
Although prior research has demonstrated that peers influence both physical aggression and exposure to violence during adolescence, few studies have investigated the extent to which peers play a role in relations between physical aggression and violence exposure. This longitudinal study examined peer pressure for fighting, friends' delinquent behavior, and friends' support for fighting as mediators of relations between exposure to violence through witnessing and victimization, and adolescents' frequency of physical aggression. Participants were 2,707 adolescents attending three urban middle schools (Mage = 12.4; 52% female; 79% African American, 17% Hispanic/Latino). Participants completed measures of their frequency of physical aggression, witnessing community violence, victimization by violence, and negative life events, and peer variables at four waves within the same school year. Cross-lagged analyses indicated that the role of peer variables as mediators varied as a function of the type of exposure and the direction of effects. Whereas peer pressure for fighting mediated relations between witnessing violence and changes in physical aggression, friends' delinquent behavior mediated relations between physical aggression and changes in witnessing violence and victimization. In contrast, violent victimization was not associated with changes in any of the peer factors when included in the same model as witnessing violence. These findings highlight the role of peers as both a cause and a consequence of adolescents' aggressive behavior and exposure to violence. They suggest focusing on peer variables as targets for interventions to disrupt connections between exposure to violence and physical aggression during early adolescence.

12 August 2019 in Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KOKelly E. O’Connor
Kelly E. O’Connor
AFAlbert D Farrell
Albert D Farrell
WKWendy Kliewer
Wendy Kliewer
Stephen LeporeStephen Lepore
Stephen Lepore