This work describes a learning tool named ARGeoITS that combines augmented reality with an intelligent tutoring system to support geometry learning. The work depicts a study developed in Mexico to measure the impact on the learning and motivation of students using two different learning systems: an intelligent tutoring system with augmented reality (ARGeoITS) and a system with only augmented reality (ARGeo). To study the effect of this type of technology (ARGeoITS, ARGeo) and time of assessment (pre-, post-) on learning gains and motivation, we applied a 2 × 2 factorial design to 106 middle school students. Both pretest and post-test questionnaires were applied to each group to determine the students’ learning gains, as was an IMMS motivational survey to evaluate the students’ motivation. The results show that: (1) students who used the intelligent tutoring system ARGeoITS scored higher in learning gain (7.47) compared with those who used ARGeo (6.83); and (2) both the ARGeoITS and ARGeo learning tools have a positive impact on students’ motivation. The research findings imply that intelligent tutoring systems that integrate augmented reality can be exploited as an effective learning environment to help middle–high school students learn difficult topics such as geometry.

The recent pandemic brought on considerable changes in terms of learning activities, which were moved from in-person classroom-based lessons to virtual work performed at home in most world regions. One of the most considerable challenges faced by educators was keeping students motivated toward learning activities. Interactive learning environments in general, and augmented reality (AR)-based learning environments in particular, are thought to foster emotional and cognitive engagement when used in the classroom. This study aims to compare the motivation and learning outcomes of middle school students in two educational settings: in the classroom and at home. The study involved 55 middle school students using the AR application to practice basic chemistry concepts. The results suggested that students’ general motivation towards the activity was similar in both settings. However, students who worked at home reported better satisfaction and attention levels compared with those who worked in the classroom. Additionally, students who worked at home made fewer mistakes and achieved better grades compared with those who worked in the classroom. Overall, the study suggests that AR can be exploited as an effective learning environment for learning the basic principles of chemistry in home settings.