Ivana Pobočíková

Dr. Ivana Pobočíková

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

13Years (2014-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2017 in Procedia Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IPIvana Pobočíková
Ivana Pobočíková
ZSZuzana Sedliačková
Zuzana Sedliačková
MMMária Michalková
Mária Michalková

1 January 2014 in Applied Mathematical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IPIvana Pobočíková
Ivana Pobočíková
ZSZuzana Sedliačková
Zuzana Sedliačková

1 September 2020 in Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DODeniz Ozonur
Deniz Ozonur
IPIvana Pobočíková
Ivana Pobočíková
ASAmaury Souza
Amaury Souza

5 July 2022 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MAMarcel Carvalho Abreu
Marcel Carvalho Abreu
GLGustavo Bastos Lyra
Gustavo Bastos Lyra
José Francisco Oliveira JúniorJosé Francisco Oliveira Júnior
José Francisco Oliveira Júnior
ASAmaury Souza
Amaury Souza
IPIvana Pobočíková
Ivana Pobočíková
RARodolfo Cesar Real Abreu
Rodolfo Cesar Real Abreu

22 March 2023 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IPIvana Pobočíková
Ivana Pobočíková
MMMária Michalková
Mária Michalková
ZSZuzana Sedliačková
Zuzana Sedliačková
DJDaniela Jurášová
Daniela Jurášová
In the paper, we statistically analysed data on the average hourly wind speed obtained from the meteorological station Poprad (located at the Poprad-Tatry airport, the Prešov region, Northern Slovakia) for the period 2005–2021. High altitude and rough mountainous terrain influence the weather conditions considerably and are a source of occasional weather risks. Finding an appropriate wind speed distribution for modelling the wind speed data is therefore important to determine the wind profile at this particular location. In addition to the commonly used two- and three-parameter Weibull distribution, a more flexible exponentiated Weibull (EW) distribution was applied to model the wind speed. Based on the results of the goodness-of-fit criteria (the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, the Anderson–Darling test, Akaike’s and Bayesian information criteria, the root mean square error, and the coefficient of determination), the EW distribution obtained a significantly better fit to seasonal and monthly wind speed data, especially around the peaks of the data. The EW distribution also proved to be a good model for data with high positive skewness. Therefore, we can recommend the EW distribution as a flexible distribution for modelling a dataset with extremely strong winds or outliers in the direction of the right tail. Alongside the wind speed analysis, we also provided the wind direction analysis, finding out that the most prevailing direction was west (W)—with an occurrence rate of 34.99%, and a mean wind speed of 3.91 m/s, whereas the northern (N) direction featured the lowest occurrence rate of only 4.45% and the mean wind speed of 1.99 m/s.

18 March 2020 in Ozone: Science & Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ASAmaury Souza
Amaury Souza
FAFlavio Aristone
Flavio Aristone
WFWidinei A. Fernandes
Widinei A. Fernandes
AOAna Paula Garcia Oliveira
Ana Paula Garcia Oliveira
ZOZaccheus Olaofe
Zaccheus Olaofe
IPIvana Pobočíková
Ivana Pobočíková
This present study aims to evaluate the stratospheric ozone that was continuously measured during 2016 over Campo Grande, the capital of South Mato Grosso state, Brazil. To determine the best-adjusted distribution describing the ozone (O3) co-generation data in Campo Grande, 15 functions were used while modeling the numerical results. Five sets of data were used: the entire year, spring (September to December), summer (December to March, high solar radiation data), autumn (March to June), and winter (June to September, low solar radiation data) to study the seasonal variation in the statistical behavior of the probability distribution functions. The distribution performances are evaluated using three tests of quality, namely Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K-S), Anderson–Darling (A-D), and Chi-square tests. Finally, all the results of the fitted quality tests have been compared. It has been observed that the generalized extreme value distribution provides a good fit all along the year, while for specific seasons the best distributions vary. The best distributions, according to the seasons, are Gamma 3P for the winter, lognormal 3P for spring, Weibull for summer and Gamma 3P for autumn, respectively. There was a coincidence in the probability distribution function adjustment in winter and autumn, period with lower O3 concentrations, kurtosis, and skewness. In the summer and spring, it was observed higher concentrations of O3, kurtosis, and asymmetry and different probability distribution functions.