Nejat Rahmanian

Dr. Nejat Rahmanian

Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2015 in Journal of Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NRNejat Rahmanian
Nejat Rahmanian
SAS Ali
S Ali
MHM Homayoonfard
M Homayoonfard
NAN J Ali
N J Ali
Mohammad RehanMohammad Rehan
Mohammad Rehan
Abdul-Sattar NizamiAbdul-Sattar Nizami
Abdul-Sattar Nizami
The drinking water quality was investigated in suspected parts of Perak state, Malaysia, to ensure the continuous supply of clean and safe drinking water for the public health protection. In this regard, a detailed physical and chemical analysis of drinking water samples was carried out in different residential and commercial areas of the state. A number of parameters such as pH, turbidity, conductivity, total suspended solids (TSS), total dissolved solids (TDS), and heavy metals such as Cu, Zn, Mg, Fe, Cd, Pb, Cr, As, Hg, and Sn were analysed for each water sample collected during winter and summer periods. The obtained values of each parameter were compared with the standard values set by the World Health Organization (WHO) and local standards such as National Drinking Water Quality Standard (NDWQS). The values of each parameter were found to be within the safe limits set by the WHO and NDWQS. Overall, the water from all the locations was found to be safe as drinking water. However, it is also important to investigate other potential water contaminations such as chemicals and microbial and radiological materials for a longer period of time, including human body fluids, in order to assess the overall water quality of Perak state.

8 December 2021 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MKMahdi Kheirinik
Mahdi Kheirinik
SAShaab Ahmed
Shaab Ahmed
NRNejat Rahmanian
Nejat Rahmanian
Evaluation of economic aspects is one of the main milestones that affect taking rapid actions in dealing with GHGs mitigation; in particular, avoiding CO2 emissions from large source points, such as power plants. In the present study, three kinds of capturing solutions for coal power plants as the most common source of electricity generation have been studied from technical and economic standpoints. Aspen HYSYS (ver.11) has been used to simulate the overall processes, calculate the battery limit, and assess required equipment. The Taylor scoring method has been utilized to calculate the costliness indexes, assessing the capital and investment costs of a 230 MW power plant using anthracite coal with and without post-combustion, pre-combustion, and oxy-fuel combustion CO2 capture technologies. Comparing the costs and the levelized cost of electricity, it was found that pre-combustion is more costly, to the extent that the total investment for it is approximately 1.6 times higher than the oxy-fuel process. Finally, post-combustion, in terms of maturity and cost-effectiveness, seems to be more attractive, since the capital cost and indirect costs are less. Most importantly, this can be applied to the existing plants without major disruption to the current operation of the plants.

21 August 2018 in Energies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPSuoton Philip Peletiri
Suoton Philip Peletiri
NRNejat Rahmanian
Nejat Rahmanian
Iqbal M MujtabaIqbal M Mujtaba
Iqbal M Mujtaba
There is a need to accurately design pipelines to meet the expected increase in the construction of carbon dioxide (CO2) pipelines after the signing of the Paris Climate Agreement. CO2 pipelines are usually designed with the assumption of a pure CO2 fluid, even though it usually contains impurities, which affect the critical pressure, critical temperature, phase behaviour, and pressure and temperature changes in the pipeline. The design of CO2 pipelines and the calculation of process parameters and fluid properties is not quite accurate with the assumption of pure CO2 fluids. This paper reviews the design of rich CO2 pipelines including pipeline route selection, length and right of way, fluid flow rates and velocities, need for single point-to-point or trunk pipelines, pipeline operating pressures and temperatures, pipeline wall thickness, fluid stream composition, fluid phases, and pipeline diameter and pressure drop calculations. The performance of a hypothetical pipeline was simulated using gPROMS (ver. 4.2.0) and Aspen HYSYS (ver.10.1) and the results of both software were compared to validate equations. Pressure loss due to fluid acceleration was ignored in the development of the diameter/pressure drop equations. Work is ongoing to incorporate fluid acceleration effect and the effects of impurities to improve the current models.

1 June 2009 in Powder Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NRNejat Rahmanian
Nejat Rahmanian
MGM. Ghadiri
M. Ghadiri
XJX. Jia
X. Jia
FŠFrantišek Štěpánek
František Štěpánek

1 October 2017 in Advanced Powder Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMohammadreza Alizadeh Behjani
Mohammadreza Alizadeh Behjani
NRNejat Rahmanian
Nejat Rahmanian
NGNur Fardina Bt Abdul Ghani
Nur Fardina Bt Abdul Ghani
AHAli Hassanpour
Ali Hassanpour

1 May 2011 in Chemical Engineering Research and Design
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NRNejat Rahmanian
Nejat Rahmanian
ANAyman Naji
Ayman Naji
MGMojtaba Ghadiri
Mojtaba Ghadiri