Claudia Martinez-Tapia

Dr. Claudia Martinez-Tapia


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 January 2016 in The Oncologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMClaudia Martinez-Tapia
Claudia Martinez-Tapia
FCFlorence Canouï‐Poitrine
Florence Canouï‐Poitrine
SBSylvie Bastuji-Garin
Sylvie Bastuji-Garin
Pierre Louis SoubeyranPierre Louis Soubeyran
Pierre Louis Soubeyran
SMSimone Mathoulin-Pelissier
Simone Mathoulin-Pelissier
OGon behalf of the ELCAPA Study Group
on behalf of the ELCAPA Study Group
Background.: A multidimensional geriatric assessment (GA) is recommended in older cancer patients to inventory health problems and tailor treatment decisions accordingly but requires considerable time and human resources. The G8 is among the most sensitive screening tools for selecting patients warranting a full GA but has limited specificity. We sought to develop and validate an optimized version of the G8. Patients and Methods.: We used a prospective cohort of cancer patients aged ≥70 years referred to geriatricians for GA (2007–2012: n = 729 [training set]; 2012–2014: n = 414 [validation set]). Abnormal GA was defined as at least one impaired domain across seven validated tests. Multiple correspondence analysis, multivariate logistic regression, and bootstrapped internal validation were performed sequentially. Results.: The final model included six independent predictors for abnormal GA: weight loss, cognition/mood, performance status, self-rated health status, polypharmacy (≥6 medications per day), and history of heart failure/coronary heart disease. For the original G8, sensitivity was 87.2% (95% confidence interval, 84.3–89.7), specificity 57.7% (47.3–67.7), and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 86.5% (83.5–89.6). The modified G8 had corresponding values of 89.2% (86.5–91.5), 79.0% (69.4–86.6), and 91.6% (89.3; 93.9), with higher AUROC values for all tumor sites and stable properties on the validation set. Conclusion.: A modified G8 screening tool exhibited better diagnostic performance with greater uniformity across cancer sites and required only six items. If these features are confirmed in other settings, the modified tool may facilitate selection for a full GA in older patients with cancer.

1 September 2017 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CMClaudia Martinez-Tapia
Claudia Martinez-Tapia
Éléna PaillaudÉléna Paillaud
Éléna Paillaud
ELEvelyne Liuu
Evelyne Liuu
CTChristophe Tournigand
Christophe Tournigand
RIRima Ibrahim
Rima Ibrahim
SRS. Raccah
S. Raccah

11 October 2023 in ESMO Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMarc-Antoine Benderra
Marc-Antoine Benderra
AGAdolfo González-Serrano
Adolfo González-Serrano
EPE. Paillaud
E. Paillaud
CMClaudia Martinez-Tapia
Claudia Martinez-Tapia
TCT. Cudennec
T. Cudennec
FCF. Canoui-Poitrïne
F. Canoui-Poitrïne
In older patients, comorbidities competed with cancer for mortality risk. We assessed the prognostic value of comorbidities in older patients with cancer. We analysed all patients >70 years of age with colorectal, breast, prostate, or lung cancer included in the prospective ELCAPA cohort. The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatrics (CIRS-G) score was used to assess comorbidities. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) at 3, 12, and 36 months. The adjusted difference in the restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used to assess the strength of the relationship between comorbidities and survival. Of the 1551 patients included (median age 82 years; interquartile range 78-86 years), 502 (32%), 575 (38%), 283 (18%), and 191 (12%) had colorectal, breast, prostate, and lung cancer, respectively, and 50% had metastatic disease. Hypertension, kidney failure, and cognitive impairment were the most common comorbidities (67%, 38%, and 29% of the patients, respectively). A CIRS-G score >17, two or more severe comorbidities, more than seven comorbidities, heart failure, and cognitive impairment were independently associated with shorter OS. The greatest effect size was observed for CIRS-G >17 (versus CIRS-G <11): at 36 months, the adjusted differences in the RMST (95% confidence interval) were -6.0 months (-9.3 to -2.6 months) for colorectal cancer, -9.1 months (-13.2 to -4.9 months) for breast cancer, -8.3 months (-12.8 to -3.9 months) for prostate cancer, and -5.5 months (-9.9 to -1.1 months) for lung cancer (P < 0.05 for all). Comorbidities' type, number, and severity were independently associated with shorter OS. A 17-point cut-off over 56 for the total CIRS-G score could be considered in clinical practice.

21 April 2017 in Oncotarget
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FPFrederic Pamoukdjian
Frederic Pamoukdjian
FCFlorence Canouï‐Poitrine
Florence Canouï‐Poitrine
CLCoralie Longelin-Lombard
Coralie Longelin-Lombard
TAThomas Aparicio
Thomas Aparicio
NGNathalie Ganne
Nathalie Ganne
Éléna PaillaudÉléna Paillaud
Éléna Paillaud
Background: The diagnostic performance of tools used to screen vulnerability in older cancer patients varies widely. We assessed the diagnostic performance of gait speed (GS) for assessing vulnerability in such patients.

8 November 2023 in Cancer Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DADéborah Assouan
Déborah Assouan
EPElena Paillaud
Elena Paillaud
PCPhilippe Caillet
Philippe Caillet
ABAmaury Broussier
Amaury Broussier
EKEmmanuelle Kempf
Emmanuelle Kempf
CMClaudia Martinez-Tapia
Claudia Martinez-Tapia
Background: In older patients with cancer, comorbidities compete with cancer for cause of death. The objectives were to evaluate cancer mortality and factors associated, according to metastatic status.Methods: Between 2007 and 2014, patients with cancer aged ≥70 referred for pre‐therapeutic geriatric assessment (GA) were included through the ELCAPA prospective cohort study. The underlying cause of death was defined according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. The World Health Organisation definition was used to categorise the cause of death as cancer versus another disease (e.g. cardiovascular disease, infectious disease, etc.) Competing risk models were used.Results: Mean (SD) age of the 1445 included patients was 80.2 (5.8) and 48% were women. Most common tumour sites were colorectal (19%), breast (17%) and urinary (15%); 773 patients (49%) had metastases. After a 34‐month median follow‐up, 706 cancer deaths were observed among 843 deaths. The 6‐month and 3‐year cancer mortality rates (95% CI) were 12% (9–15) and 34% (29–38) for non‐metastatic patients and 43% (39–47) and 79% (75–82) for metastatic patients, respectively. Dependency in activities of daily living and comorbidities were associated with 6‐month and 3‐year cancer mortality in non‐metastatic (adjusted subhazard ratio [aSHR] = 1.68 [0.99–2.85] and 1.69 [1.16–2.45]; and 1.98 [1.08–3.63] and 3.38 [1.47–7.76], respectively) and metastatic patients (aSHR = 2.81 [2.01–3.93] and 2.95 [2.14–4.07]; and 1.63 [1.18–2.25] and 2.06 [1.39–3.05], respectively). Impaired Timed‐Get‐Up‐and‐Go test was associated with 6‐month and 3‐year cancer mortality in metastatic patients (aSHR = 1.5 [1.06–2.12] and 1.38 [1.06–1.81], respectively). Obesity was negatively associated with 3‐year cancer death in non‐metastatic (aSHR = 0.53 [0.29–0.97]) and metastatic patients (aSHR = 0.71 [0.51–1.00]).Conclusions: The majority of older adults with cancer referred for pre‐therapeutic GA die from cancer. Geriatric parameters are independently associated with cancer mortality and should be considered for prognosis assessment, decision‐making and care.

21 March 2023 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CMClaudia Martinez-Tapia
Claudia Martinez-Tapia
KRKevin Rougette
Kevin Rougette
VFVirginie Fossey-Diaz
Virginie Fossey-Diaz
TCTristan Cudennec
Tristan Cudennec
CTCherifa Taleb
Cherifa Taleb
Éléna PaillaudÉléna Paillaud
Éléna Paillaud
Older cancer patients have an elevated risk of sarcopenia. The aim was to estimate the prevalence of four criteria for sarcopenia case finding, assessment, diagnosis, and severity determination: abnormal strength, assistance with walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falls (SARC-F), low hand-grip strength (HGS), low arm circumference (AC, a muscle mass proxy), and low physical performance (PP). Sarcopenia (low HGS and AC) and severe sarcopenia (low HGS, AC, and PP) and their predictive values for 6-month mortality were estimated in the whole population and by metastatic status. We analyzed data from the NutriAgeCancer French nationwide study of cancer patients aged ≥70 referred for geriatric assessment before anti-cancer treatment. We performed Cox proportional hazards analysis for each criterion separately and all criteria combined. Overall, 781 patients from 41 geriatric oncology clinics were included (mean age: 83.1; females: 53%; main cancer types: digestive (29%) and breast (17%); metastases: 42%). The prevalence of abnormal SARC-F, low HGS, a low AC, low PP, sarcopenia, and severe sarcopenia were, respectively, 35.5%, 44.6%, 44.7%, 35.2%, 24.5%, and 11.7%. An abnormal SARC-F and/or low HGS, sarcopenia, and severe sarcopenia were associated with 6-month mortality in patients with metastases (adjusted hazard ratios [95% confidence interval]: 2.72 [1.34–5.49], 3.16 [1.48–6.75] and 6.41 [2.5–16.5], respectively). Sarcopenia was strongly predictive of 6-month mortality in patients with metastatic cancer.