Marc-Antoine Benderra

Dr. Marc-Antoine Benderra

AP-HP Greater Paris University Hospital, Tenon Hospital, Medical Oncology Department, Paris, France
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2021 in European Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EKEmmanuelle Kempf
Emmanuelle Kempf
GLGuillaume Lamé
Guillaume Lamé
RLRichard Layese
Richard Layese
SPSonia Priou
Sonia Priou
GCGilles Chatellier
Gilles Chatellier
CTChristophe Tournigand
Christophe Tournigand

11 October 2023 in ESMO Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MBMarc-Antoine Benderra
Marc-Antoine Benderra
AGAdolfo González-Serrano
Adolfo González-Serrano
EPE. Paillaud
E. Paillaud
CMClaudia Martinez-Tapia
Claudia Martinez-Tapia
TCT. Cudennec
T. Cudennec
FCF. Canoui-Poitrïne
F. Canoui-Poitrïne
In older patients, comorbidities competed with cancer for mortality risk. We assessed the prognostic value of comorbidities in older patients with cancer. We analysed all patients >70 years of age with colorectal, breast, prostate, or lung cancer included in the prospective ELCAPA cohort. The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatrics (CIRS-G) score was used to assess comorbidities. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) at 3, 12, and 36 months. The adjusted difference in the restricted mean survival time (RMST) was used to assess the strength of the relationship between comorbidities and survival. Of the 1551 patients included (median age 82 years; interquartile range 78-86 years), 502 (32%), 575 (38%), 283 (18%), and 191 (12%) had colorectal, breast, prostate, and lung cancer, respectively, and 50% had metastatic disease. Hypertension, kidney failure, and cognitive impairment were the most common comorbidities (67%, 38%, and 29% of the patients, respectively). A CIRS-G score >17, two or more severe comorbidities, more than seven comorbidities, heart failure, and cognitive impairment were independently associated with shorter OS. The greatest effect size was observed for CIRS-G >17 (versus CIRS-G <11): at 36 months, the adjusted differences in the RMST (95% confidence interval) were -6.0 months (-9.3 to -2.6 months) for colorectal cancer, -9.1 months (-13.2 to -4.9 months) for breast cancer, -8.3 months (-12.8 to -3.9 months) for prostate cancer, and -5.5 months (-9.9 to -1.1 months) for lung cancer (P < 0.05 for all). Comorbidities' type, number, and severity were independently associated with shorter OS. A 17-point cut-off over 56 for the total CIRS-G score could be considered in clinical practice.

29 April 2022 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FCFlorence Canouï‐Poitrine
Florence Canouï‐Poitrine
LSLauriane Segaux
Lauriane Segaux
MBMarc-Antoine Benderra
Marc-Antoine Benderra
FAFrédégonde About
Frédégonde About
CTChristophe Tournigand
Christophe Tournigand
OGon behalf of the ELCAPA Study Group
on behalf of the ELCAPA Study Group
Background: A prognostic assessment is crucial for making cancer treatment decisions in older patients. We assessed the prognostic performance (relative to one-year mortality) of eight comorbidity indices in a cohort of older patients with cancer. Methods: We studied patients with cancer aged ≥70 included in the Elderly Cancer Patient (ELCAPA) cohort between 2007 and 2010. We assessed seven nonspecific indices (Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), three modified versions of the CCI, the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, the Gagne index, and the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for Geriatrics (CIRS-G)) and the National Cancer Institute Comorbidity Index. Results: Overall, 510 patients were included. Among patients with nonmetastatic cancer, all the comorbidity indices were independently associated with 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of 1.44 to 2.51 for one standard deviation increment; p < 0.05 for all) and had very good discriminant ability (Harrell’s C > 0.8 for the eight indices), but were poorly calibrated. Among patients with metastatic cancer, only the CIRS-G was independently associated with 1-year mortality (aHR (95% confidence interval): 1.26 [1.06–1.50]). Discriminant ability was moderate (0.61 to 0.70) for the subsets of patients with metastatic cancer and colorectal cancer. Conclusion: Comorbidity indices had strong prognostic value and discriminative ability for one-year mortality in older patients with nonmetastatic cancer, although calibration was poor. In older patients with metastatic cancer, only the CIRS-G was predictive of one-year mortality.

11 May 2024 in Cancer Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TPThierry Petit
Thierry Petit
NHNawale Hajjaji
Nawale Hajjaji
EAEric‐Charles Antoine
Eric‐Charles Antoine
MBMarc-Antoine Benderra
Marc-Antoine Benderra
MGMichel Gozy
Michel Gozy
JPJean‐Yves Pierga
Jean‐Yves Pierga
Background: Early access program (formerly cohort Temporary Authorization for Use) was granted for trastuzumab deruxtecan (T‐DXd) in France based on DESTINY‐Breast01 trial which demonstrated its efficacy and safety in HER2‐positive metastatic/unresectable breast cancer after ≥2 anti‐HER2‐based regimens received at metastatic stage.Methods: This multicenter real‐world early access program included HER2‐positive metastatic/unresectable breast patients pretreated with at least two lines of anti‐HER2 regimens who received T‐DXd 5.4 mg/kg intravenously in monotherapy every 3 weeks.Results: Four hundred and fifty‐nine patients (median age, 58 years; hormone receptor‐positive, 67%; brain metastases, 28.1%) received T‐DXd. Before inclusion, 81.7% of patients had radiation therapy and 76.5% had undergone surgery. Median number of prior metastatic treatment lines was four (range, 2–22); 99.8% patients had received trastuzumab, 94.8% trastuzumab emtansine and 79.3% pertuzumab. Follow‐up was performed from September 30, 2020 to March 30, 2021; when the early access program stopped, the median duration of T‐DXd treatment was 3.4 (range, 0–7.8) months. In 160 patients with available tumor assessment, objective response rate was 56.7% and 12.1% had progression. In 57 patients with available brain tumor assessment, complete or partial intracranial response was reported for 35.7% patients and 5.4% had progression. A total of 17 (3.7%) patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) was reported with no cases of ILD‐related death.Conclusions: In this early access program in patients with heavily pretreated HER2‐positive metastatic/unresectable breast cancer, T‐DXd had antitumor activity with a similar response to that reported in previous clinical studies. T‐DXd was well tolerated and no new safety signals were observed.

23 September 2021 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMarc-Antoine Benderra
Marc-Antoine Benderra
AAAinhoa Aparicio-Monforte
Ainhoa Aparicio-Monforte
JLJudith LEBLANC
Judith LEBLANC
DWDemian Wassermann
Demian Wassermann
EKEmmanuelle Kempf
Emmanuelle Kempf
A(Ap-Hp Covid Cdw Initiative (Acci)
Ap-Hp Covid Cdw Initiative (Acci)
Background: COVID-19 may be more frequent and more severe in cancer patients than in other individuals. Our aims were to assess the rate of COVID-19 in hospitalized cancer patients, to describe their demographic characteristics, clinical features and care trajectories, and to assess the mortality rate. Methods: This multicenter cohort study was based on the Electronic Health Records of the Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP). Cancer patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 between 3 March and 19 May 2020 were included. Main outcome was all-cause mortality within 30 days of COVID-19 diagnosis. Results: A total of 29,141 cancer patients were identified and 7791 (27%) were tested for SARS-CoV-2. Of these, 1359 (17%) were COVID-19-positive and 1148 (84%) were hospitalized; 217 (19%) were admitted to an intensive care unit. The mortality rate was 33% (383 deaths). In multivariate analysis, mortality-related factors were male sex (aHR = 1.39 [95% CI: 1.07–1.81]), advanced age (78–86 y: aHR = 2.83 [95% CI: 1.78–4.51] vs. <66 y; 86–103 y: aHR = 2.61 [95% CI: 1.56–4.35] vs. 20 ng/mL (aHR = 2.20 [95% CI: 1.70–2.86]). Primary brains tumors (aHR = 2.19 [95% CI: 1.08–4.44]) and lung cancer (aHR = 1.66 [95% CI: 1.02–2.70]) were associated with higher mortality. Risk of dying was lower among patients with metabolic comorbidities (aHR = 0.65 [95% CI: 0.50–0.84]). Conclusions: In a hospital-based setting, cancer patients with COVID-19 had a high mortality rate. This mortality was mainly driven by age, sex, number of comorbidities and presence of inflammation. This is the first cohort of cancer patients in which metabolic comorbidities were associated with a better outcome.

1 November 2023 in Cancer Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
EGEtienne Guével
Etienne Guével
SPSonia Priou
Sonia Priou
GLGuillaume Lamé
Guillaume Lamé
JWJohanna Wassermann
Johanna Wassermann
RBRomain Bey
Romain Bey
EKEmmanuelle Kempf
Emmanuelle Kempf
Background: The SARS CoV‐2 pandemic disrupted healthcare systems. We compared the cancer stage for new breast cancers (BCs) before and during the pandemic.Methods: We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study on the data warehouse of Greater Paris University Hospitals (AP‐HP). We identified all female patients newly referred with a BC in 2019 and 2020. We assessed the timeline of their care trajectories, initial tumor stage, and treatment received: BC resection, exclusive systemic therapy, exclusive radiation therapy, or exclusive best supportive care (BSC). We calculated patients' 1‐year overall survival (OS) and compared indicators in 2019 and 2020.Results: In 2019 and 2020, 2055 and 1988, new BC patients underwent cancer treatment, and during the two lockdowns, the BC diagnoses varied by −18% and by +23% compared to 2019. De novo metastatic tumors (15% and 15%, p = 0.95), pTNM and ypTNM distributions of 1332 cases with upfront resection and of 296 cases with neoadjuvant therapy did not differ (p = 0.37, p = 0.3). The median times from first multidisciplinary meeting and from diagnosis to treatment of 19 days (interquartile 11–39 days) and 35 days (interquartile 22–65 days) did not differ. Access to plastic surgery (15% and 17%, p = 0.08) and to treatment categories did not vary: tumor resection (73% and 72%), exclusive systemic therapy (13% and 14%), exclusive radiation therapy (9% and 9%), exclusive BSC (5% and 5%) (p = 0.8). Among resected patients, the neoadjuvant therapy rate was lower in 2019 (16%) versus 2020 (20%) (p = 0.02). One‐year OS rates were 99.3% versus 98.9% (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.77–1.2), 72.6% versus 76.6% (HR = 1.28; 95% CI, 0.95–1.72), 96.6% versus 97.8% (HR = 1.09; 95% CI, 0.61–1.94), and 15.5% versus 15.1% (HR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.72–1.37), in the treatment groups.Conclusions: Despite a decrease in the number of new BCs, there was no tumor stage shift, and OS did not vary.