Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into ship design workflows, offering enhanced capabilities for hydrodynamic and structural optimization. This review focuses on AI-based methods applied to key design tasks such as hull resistance prediction, structural weight reduction, and performance-driven form optimization. Techniques examined include deep neural networks (DNNs), support vector machines (SVMs), tree-based ensemble models, genetic algorithms (GAs), and surrogate modeling approaches. Comparative analyses from the literature indicate that ensemble tree methods, such as XGBoost, have achieved predictive accuracies up to $R^2$ = 0.995 in speed–power modeling, marginally surpassing DNN performance, while GA-based structural optimization studies have reported weight reductions exceeding 10%. The findings confirm that no single method is universally superior; rather, effectiveness depends on the problem definition, data quality, and computational resources available. Hybrid strategies that combine physics-based modeling with data-driven learning have demonstrated improved generalization, reduced data requirements, and enhanced interpretability. Practical challenges remain, including limited access to open high-fidelity datasets, the computational demands of complex models, and balancing predictive accuracy with explainability. The review concludes that AI should be employed as a complementary toolkit to augment human expertise, with method selection guided by design objectives, constraints, and integration within the broader ship design process.

Modern optimisation methodologies have revolutionised the engineering sector and pave the way for innovation. In ship design, this has been spearheaded by the introduction of the Holistic Design approach that allows more attributes and performances of the end product to be assessed accurately and concurrently even at the early design phase. In this respect, the authors present herein a methodology based on the optimisation of the functionalities that the general arrangement needs to provide (in this case; adjacency, noise and evacuation flow). The methodology allows for a large optimisation space, several objectives and intrinsic control by the user at all the stages. By re-arranging the location of the spaces onboard, in relation to their position on the hull as well as between themselves, significant improvements can be achieved. More functional objectives can be incorporated through modularity and penalty functions, keeping the overall process simple and flexible to adapt to fluid early design requirements.

The subject of damaged stability has greatly profited from the development of new tools and techniques in recent history. Specifically, the increased computational power and the probabilistic approach have transformed the subject, increasing accuracy and fidelity, hence allowing for a universal application and the inclusion of the most probable scenarios. Currently, all ships are evaluated for their stability and are expected to survive the dangers they will most likely face. However, further advancements in simulations have made it possible to further increase the fidelity and accuracy of simulated casualties. Multiple time domain and, to a lesser extent, Computational Fluid dynamics (CFD) solutions have been suggested as the next “evolutionary” step for damage stability. However, while those techniques are demonstrably more accurate, the computational power to utilize them for the task of probabilistic evaluation is not there yet. In this paper, the authors present a novel approach that aims to serve as a stopgap measure for introducing the time domain simulations in the existing framework. Specifically, the methodology presented serves the purpose of a fast decision support tool which is able to provide information regarding the ongoing casualty utilizing prior knowledge gained from simulations. This work was needed and developed for the purposes of the EU-funded project SafePASS.

Over the past fifteen years, ship manoeuvring has evolved from a highly specialised branch of marine hydrodynamics into a key enabler within multidisciplinary research, integrating seakeeping and intact stability, and paving the way for digital twins and autonomous maritime systems. The scope of this review is to examine the existing literature in a way that paves the way forward for integration with robotics, aerial and surface drones, digital-twin (DT) ecosystems, and other interconnected autonomous platforms. This paper reviews the published articles during this period, tracing the field’s progression from classical hydrodynamic models to intelligent, data-centric, and regulation-aware maritime systems. Drawing on a structured bibliometric dataset covering 2010–2025, this study organises the literature into interconnected themes spanning physics-based manoeuvring models, adaptive and predictive control, machine learning and digital-twin (DT) technologies, collision-avoidance and regulatory reasoning, environmental performance, and cooperative autonomy. The analysis reveals the transition from static empirical modelling toward hybrid physics, artificial intelligence (AI) frameworks capable of capturing nonlinear dynamics, uncertainty, and multi-vessel interactions. At the same time, this review highlights the growing influence of Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea (COLREGs), the Second-Generation Intact Stability Criteria, and emissions-reduction targets in shaping technical developments. While learning-enabled prediction, model predictive control (MPC)-based regulatory compliance, and real-time DT synchronisation show increasing maturity, this study identifies unresolved challenges, including domain shift, model interpretability, certification barriers, multi-agent safety guarantees, and DT divergence under sparse data. By mapping both demonstrated capabilities and conceptual frontiers, this review presents manoeuvring as a central pillar of future Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) operations and sustainable shipping. The findings outline a research agenda toward integrated, explainable, and environmentally aligned manoeuvring intelligence that can support safe, efficient, and regulation-compliant autonomous maritime systems.

Digitalisation is reshaping shipyard production, yet its methodological foundations remain fragmented across simulation, optimisation, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Digital Twin (DT) research streams. This paper presents a domain-specific methodological review of shipyard production modelling from 2010 to 2025, synthesising advances in Discrete-Event Simulation (DES), multi-objective optimisation, hybrid simulation–optimisation architectures, Machine Learning (ML), reinforcement learning (RL), and DT-enabled cyber-physical systems. Using an explicit evaluative framework based on integration depth, validation basis, and decision scope, the review differentiates between analytically mature but execution-decoupled DES/optimisation approaches and integration-rich yet variably validated DT and AI-driven systems. The analysis shows that hybrid DES-optimisation frameworks currently represent the most operationally credible class of methods, delivering measurable production improvements under structured conditions, whereas many DT and AI contributions prioritise architectural integration and data synchronisation over longitudinal yard-wide KPI validation. A comparative assessment of simulation platforms, optimisation engines, and manufacturing execution system/enterprise resource planning/product lifecycle management infrastructures highlights the central role of structured product–process–resource data and execution-layer connectivity, while severe confidentiality constraints and the scarcity of openly available industrial datasets continue to limit reproducibility and benchmarking. Overall, shipyard production research is progressing toward increasingly integrated and cyber-physical systems, but sustained yard-scale validation and shared benchmark development remain critical prerequisites for translating architectural sophistication into demonstrable operational impact.

Early-stage ship design demands efficient exploration of diverse hull forms under tight geometric and performance constraints. Existing data-driven approaches often rely on a single geometric representation, limiting their ability to capture both global proportions and local shape detail. This paper presents a representation-aware generative framework that learns a shared latent encoding of hull geometry from multiple modalities: surface point clouds, waterline sections, and buttock curves. A conditional multimodal autoencoder embeds these complementary descriptors into a unified latent space, enforcing cross-modal consistency and preserving geometric fidelity. To enable the generation of novel hull forms, a latent diffusion model is trained to sample hull representations conditioned on high-level design parameters, such as principal dimensions and form coefficients. The proposed approach produces watertight and geometrically coherent hull forms that align with user-specified design parameters. Experiments on a synthetic hull dataset demonstrate improved geometric coherence and controllability. The method provides a scalable foundation for performance-aware, data-driven exploration in early-stage ship design.