Michiel van Dijk

Dr. Michiel van Dijk

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 July 2021 in Nature Food
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MDMichiel van Dijk
Michiel van Dijk
TMTom Morley
Tom Morley
MRMarie Luise Rau
Marie Luise Rau
YSYashar Saghai
Yashar Saghai

18 October 2021 in Nature Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HZHao Zhao
Hao Zhao
JCJinfeng Chang
Jinfeng Chang
PHPetr Havlík
Petr Havlík
MDMichiel van Dijk
Michiel van Dijk
HVHugo Valin
Hugo Valin
MOMichael Obersteiner
Michael Obersteiner

17 December 2018 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SFStefan Frank
Stefan Frank
PHPetr Havlík
Petr Havlík
ESElke Stehfest
Elke Stehfest
HMHans Van Meijl
Hans Van Meijl
PWPeter Witzke
Peter Witzke
HVHugo Valin
Hugo Valin
Agricultural methane and nitrous oxide emissions represent around 10–12% of total anthropogenic GHG emissions and have a key role to play in achieving a 1.5 °C (above pre-industrial) climate stabilization target. Using a multi-model assessment approach, we quantify the potential contribution of agriculture to the 1.5 °C target and decompose the mitigation potential by emission source, region and mitigation mechanism. The results show that the livestock sector will be vital to achieve emission reductions consistent with the 1.5 °C target mainly through emission-reducing technologies or structural changes. Agriculture may contribute emission reductions of 0.8–1.4 Gt of CO2-equivalent (CO2e) yr−1 at just US$20 per tCO2e in 2050. Combined with dietary changes, emission reductions can be increased to 1.7–1.8 GtCO2e yr−1. At carbon prices compatible with the 1.5 °C target, agriculture could even provide average emission savings of 3.9 GtCO2e yr−1 in 2050, which represents around 8% of current GHG emissions.

1 June 2018 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HMHans Van Meijl
Hans Van Meijl
PHPetr Havlik
Petr Havlik
HLHermann Lotze-Campen
Hermann Lotze-Campen
ESElke Stehfest
Elke Stehfest
PWPeter Witzke
Peter Witzke
WZWillem-Jan van Zeist
Willem-Jan van Zeist

1 June 2017 in Agricultural Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MDMichiel van Dijk
Michiel van Dijk
TMTom Morley
Tom Morley
RJRoel Jongeneel
Roel Jongeneel
MIMartin van Ittersum
Martin van Ittersum
PRPytrik Reidsma
Pytrik Reidsma
RRRuerd Ruben
Ruerd Ruben
Despite its frequent use in policy discussions on future agricultural production, both the concept of the yield gap and its determinants are understood differently by economists and agronomists. This study provides a micro-level framework that disentangles and integrates agronomic and economic approaches to yield gap measurement. It decomposes the conventional yield gap indicator into four components that together provide a better understanding of why actual farm yield falls below potential: (1) the technical efficiency yield gap, (2) the allocative yield gap, (3) the economic yield gap and (4) the technology yield gap. The results can be used to inform targeted policy and farming recommendations at plot, farm household, local and national level. The framework is operationalised and tested by combining results from crop models with detailed farm and plot level survey data for maize production in Tanzania

1 July 2014 in World Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMartine Rutten
Martine Rutten
MDMichiel van Dijk
Michiel van Dijk
WRWilbert van Rooij
Wilbert van Rooij
HHHenk Hilderink
Henk Hilderink