Background: Instagram is a social media platform based on photos and videos that encourages interaction and comparison between users. Its growing popularity, especially among young people, has generated interest in the impact its use can have on users´ mental health, specifically on their self-esteem and degree of satisfaction with their own body image. Objective: We aimed to analyze the relationships between the use of Instagram, both the hours of daily use and the type of content viewed, and self-esteem, tendency to make physical comparisons, and satisfaction with body image. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we recruited 585 participants aged between 18 years and 40 years. Individuals who were interested in participating but had a personal history of eating disorders or had previously been diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder were excluded. The assessment tools consisted of (1) a questionnaire that collected sociodemographic data and Instagram use variables and was created by the research team specifically for this study; (2) the self-esteem scale by Rosenberg; (3) Physical Appearance Comparison Scale-Revised (PACS-R); and (4) Body Shape Questionnaire (BSQ). The recruitment and evaluation processes were carried out in January 2021. Results: Of the participants, 234 (234/585, 40%) used Instagram less than 1 hour a day, 303 (303/585, 51.8%) used Instagram between 1 hour and 3 hours a day, and 48 participants (48/585, 8.2%) used it more than 3 hours per day. We found statistically significant differences (P<.05) between the 3 groups in the scores obtained on the self-esteem test by Rosenberg, PACS-R, and BSQ. Participants who spent more time on Instagram had higher levels of body dissatisfaction, greater comparisons of physical appearance, and lower self-esteem. Moreover, we analyzed the relationship between the score obtained on the different scales and the types of content viewed, with no differences between those who mainly viewed professional content and those who primarily consumed fashion and beauty or sport and nutrition content. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the use of Instagram is associated with poorer body image satisfaction and self-esteem, mediated by the tendency to compare physical appearance in relation to the daily duration of Instagram use.

Background: Acute cardiac injury (ACI) after COVID-19 has been linked with unfavorable clinical outcomes, but data on the clinical impact of elevated cardiac troponin on discharge during follow-up are scarce. Our objective is to elucidate the clinical outcome of patients with elevated troponin on discharge after surviving a COVID-19 hospitalization. Methods: We conducted an analysis in the prospective registry HOPE-2 (NCT04778020). Only patients discharged alive were selected for analysis, and all-cause death on follow-up was considered as the primary endpoint. As a secondary endpoint, we established any long-term COVID-19 symptoms. HOPE-2 stopped enrolling patients on 31 December 2021, with 9299 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, of which 1805 were deceased during the acute phase. Finally, 2382 patients alive on discharge underwent propensity score matching by relevant baseline variables in a 1:3 fashion, from 56 centers in 8 countries. Results: Patients with elevated troponin experienced significantly higher all-cause death during follow-up (log-rank = 27.23, p < 0.001), and had a higher chance of experiencing long-term COVID-19 cardiovascular symptoms. Specifically, fatigue and dyspnea (57.7% and 62.8%, with p-values of 0.009 and <0.001, respectively) are among the most common. Conclusions: After surviving the acute phase, patients with elevated troponin on discharge present increased mortality and long-term COVID-19 symptoms over time, which is clinically relevant in follow-up visits.

Background: Despite the ongoing innovations and the availability of numerous effective inhaled treatment options, achieving optimal disease control in most patients frequently remains disappointing. Unfortunately, although inhaled therapy is the cornerstone of respiratory disease management, the selection of the most appropriate inhaler is still overlooked or underestimated by some healthcare professionals, and inhaler misuse remains a significant challenge in managing chronic respiratory diseases which directly influences patients’ quality of life, clinical outcomes, and risk of disease progression. Materials and Methods: This is a unicentric, observational, cross-sectional study designed to evaluate the inhaled therapy prescribed in hospitalized patients and to analyze device changes after hospitalization, as well as the factors associated with these changes. A single face-to-face visit was performed during the patient’s hospitalization, where the inhaled therapy used prior to hospitalization was evaluated: technique (critical errors), compliance (TAI questionnaire), maximum peak inspiratory flow [PIF (L/min)], and level of inhaler handling-related knowledge. A binary logistic regression model was used to explore the association between changing device at discharge and the other independent variables Results: The inhaler most used during hospitalization was the metered-dose inhaler (MDI) with a chamber (51.9% of patients), with the dry powdered inhalers (DPI) being the inhalers used in 43% of maintenance inhaled therapies in the community setting prior to hospitalization. In addition, 90% of patients showed a maximum PIF ≥ 30 L/min, and 35.6% performed critical inhaler errors. These patients had statistically significantly lower maximum PIF values (52.1 L/min in patients with critical inhaler errors vs. 60.8 L/min without critical inhaler errors; p > 0.001) and were more likely to exhibit poor inhaler compliance compared to those without critical errors (50.5% vs. 31.0%, respectively). More than half of the patients who used MDI with spacer chamber made critical inhaler errors; 69.9% showed regular or poor treatment adherence, although 75.6% demonstrated good knowledge about inhaler handling. Only in 27% of the patients did the healthcare professional change the type of inhaler after hospitalization within clinical practice. The medical and nursing staff responsible for the patient’s hospitalization were not informed of the assessment carried out in the study. The probability of not performing a device change at discharge was lower in patients with previous at-home treatment with combined inhaled therapy with LABA + ICS (OR 0.3 [0.18–0.83], p = 0.016) and in patients under triple inhaled therapy (OR 0.3 [0.17–0.76], p = 0.007). No significant differences were observed in inhaler changes when considering the frequency of critical inhaler errors, inhaler handling-related knowledge or maximum PIF values. Conclusions: Our study highlights the urgent need for a more personalized inhaler selection and consistent monitoring by healthcare professionals to minimize inhaler misuse, increase treatment compliance and adherence, and improve disease management outcomes. It is essential to provide training and promote the role of nursing in the evaluation and education of inhaled therapy. Additionally, the use of standardized approaches and tools, such as the CHECK DIAL, is crucial to facilitate the adaptation of devices to patients’ needs.

Background: Poor clinical control in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is prevalent, yet the interplay of disease severity, modifiable factors, and clinician perception remains poorly understood. This study aimed to determine the frequency of poor control, identify its independent determinants, and characterize the heterogeneity of the poorly controlled population receiving maintenance inhaled therapy with various devices in primary care. Methods: In a multicenter, cross-sectional analysis of 988 patients from the Study SIMPLIFY, clinical control of COPD was classified using the objective RADAR score. We used multivariable logistic regression and Machine Learning (Random Forest with SHAP analysis) to identify determinants of poor control (RADAR ≥ 4) and k-medoids cluster analysis to characterize the poorly controlled subgroup (n = 452). Results: Nearly half the cohort (45.7%, n = 452) had poor clinical control. Agreement between physician-assessed control (five categories) and RADAR classification was 49.3%, with overestimation in 34.0% and underestimation in 16.7% of cases (Cohen’s κ = −0.081; weighted κ = −0.037). The strongest independent determinants were the exacerbator phenotypes (eosinophilic aOR 6.85; non-eosinophilic aOR 4.91). Key modifiable factors included active smoking (aOR 1.92), lower TAI-12 adherence score (per point; aOR 0.96), high dosing frequency (≥4 inhalations/day; aOR 1.54) and high inhaler burden (≥3 devices; aOR 1.84). Machine learning analysis identified clinical phenotype and adherence behavior as the top two scale-independent predictors of poor control. Cluster analysis of the poorly controlled group revealed five reproducible and clinically meaningful phenotypes (C0–C4), primarily separated by treatment complexity, comorbidities, and adherence. Conclusions: Poor clinical control is common and critically under-recognized in primary care patients with COPD on maintenance inhaled therapy. This is driven by a profound clinician perception gap and a failure to address key modifiable determinants, such as high dosing frequency, regimen complexity, and poor adherence, which likely drives therapeutic inertia. Our findings underscore the need to integrate objective tools to unmask poor control and highlight the importance of treatment simplification. The identification of distinct clinical phenotypes provides a roadmap toward a more personalized, evidence-based standard of care.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the impact of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) on survival rates in women diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: A retrospective cohort of 723 women who underwent MIS for EC was analyzed, with 468 having conventional laparoscopy (LPS) and 255 undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL). Sociodemographic features, tumor characteristics, and survival rates were examined for the entire cohort and in a propensity score-matched model. Results: In the overall sample, women who underwent RAL were older, had higher BMI, more comorbidities, and more aggressive tumors. After matching for age, BMI, comorbidities, ASA score, histological type, grade, myometrial invasion, LVSI, and FIGO stage, 482 patients (241 matched pairs) were selected. Disease-free survival (DFS) HR: 1, overall survival (OS) HR: 0.9, and specific survival related to EC (SS) HR: 0.15 were similar between the LPS and RAL groups. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the choice of surgical approach (robotic or laparoscopic) does not impact survival outcomes when matched in homogeneous groups.