Robert McNabb

Dr. Robert McNabb

Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1047, Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 April 2021 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
RHRomain Hugonnet
Romain Hugonnet
RMRobert McNabb
Robert McNabb
EBEtienne Berthier
Etienne Berthier
BMBrian Menounos
Brian Menounos
CNChristopher Nuth
Christopher Nuth
AKAndreas Kääb
Andreas Kääb

8 April 2019 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MZM. Zemp
M. Zemp
MHMatthias Huss
Matthias Huss
ETEmmanuel Thibert
Emmanuel Thibert
NEN. Eckert
N. Eckert
RMRobert McNabb
Robert McNabb
JCJ. G. Cogley
J. G. Cogley

6 January 2023 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DRDavid Rounce
David Rounce
RHRegine Hock
Regine Hock
FMFabien Maussion
Fabien Maussion
RHRomain Hugonnet
Romain Hugonnet
WKWilliam Kochtitzky
William Kochtitzky
RMRobert McNabb
Robert McNabb
Glacier mass loss affects sea level rise, water resources, and natural hazards. We present global glacier projections, excluding the ice sheets, for shared socioeconomic pathways calibrated with data for each glacier. Glaciers are projected to lose 26 ± 6% (+1.5°C) to 41 ± 11% (+4°C) of their mass by 2100, relative to 2015, for global temperature change scenarios. This corresponds to 90 ± 26 to 154 ± 44 millimeters sea level equivalent and will cause 49 ± 9 to 83 ± 7% of glaciers to disappear. Mass loss is linearly related to temperature increase and thus reductions in temperature increase reduce mass loss. Based on climate pledges from the Conference of the Parties (COP26), global mean temperature is projected to increase by +2.7°C, which would lead to a sea level contribution of 115 ± 40 millimeters and cause widespread deglaciation in most mid-latitude regions by 2100.

18 April 2017 in The Cryosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DFDaniel Farinotti
Daniel Farinotti
DBDouglas J. Brinkerhoff
Douglas J. Brinkerhoff
GCGarry K. C. Clarke
Garry K. C. Clarke
JFJohannes J. Fürst
Johannes J. Fürst
HFHolger Frey
Holger Frey
LALiss M. Andreassen
Liss M. Andreassen
Knowledge of the ice thickness distribution of glaciers and ice caps is an important prerequisite for many glaciological and hydrological investigations. A wealth of approaches has recently been presented for inferring ice thickness from characteristics of the surface. With the Ice Thickness Models Intercomparison eXperiment (ITMIX) we performed the first coordinated assessment quantifying individual model performance. A set of 17 different models showed that individual ice thickness estimates can differ considerably – locally by a spread comparable to the observed thickness. Averaging the results of multiple models, however, significantly improved the results: on average over the 21 considered test cases, comparison against direct ice thickness measurements revealed deviations on the order of 10 ± 24 % of the mean ice thickness (1σ estimate). Models relying on multiple data sets – such as surface ice velocity fields, surface mass balance, or rates of ice thickness change – showed high sensitivity to input data quality. Together with the requirement of being able to handle large regions in an automated fashion, the capacity of better accounting for uncertainties in the input data will be a key for an improved next generation of ice thickness estimation approaches.

19 February 2025 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TTThe GlaMBIE Team
The GlaMBIE Team
MZMichael Zemp
Michael Zemp
LJLivia Jakob
Livia Jakob
IDInés Dussaillant
Inés Dussaillant
SNSamuel U. Nussbaumer
Samuel U. Nussbaumer
WZWhyjay Zheng
Whyjay Zheng
Glaciers are indicators of ongoing anthropogenic climate change1. Their melting leads to increased local geohazards2, and impacts marine3 and terrestrial4,5 ecosystems, regional freshwater resources6, and both global water and energy cycles7,8. Together with the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, glaciers are essential drivers of present9,10 and future11–13 sea-level rise. Previous assessments of global glacier mass changes have been hampered by spatial and temporal limitations and the heterogeneity of existing data series14–16. Here we show in an intercomparison exercise that glaciers worldwide lost 273 ± 16 gigatonnes in mass annually from 2000 to 2023, with an increase of 36 ± 10% from the first (2000–2011) to the second (2012–2023) half of the period. Since 2000, glaciers have lost between 2% and 39% of their ice regionally and about 5% globally. Glacier mass loss is about 18% larger than the loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet and more than twice that from the Antarctic Ice Sheet17. Our results arise from a scientific community effort to collect, homogenize, combine and analyse glacier mass changes from in situ and remote-sensing observations. Although our estimates are in agreement with findings from previous assessments14–16 at a global scale, we found some large regional deviations owing to systematic differences among observation methods. Our results provide a refined baseline for better understanding observational differences and for calibrating model ensembles12,16,18, which will help to narrow projection uncertainty for the twenty-first century11,12,18.

1 December 2017 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FPFrank Paul
Frank Paul
TBTobias Bolch
Tobias Bolch
KBKate Briggs
Kate Briggs
AKAndreas Kääb
Andreas Kääb
Malcolm McMillanMalcolm McMillan
Malcolm McMillan
JWJan Wuite
Jan Wuite