Frederick Angulo

Dr. Frederick Angulo

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2003 in Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SDS. M. Donabedian
S. M. Donabedian
LTL. A. Thal
L. A. Thal
EHE. Hershberger
E. Hershberger
MPM. B. Perri
M. B. Perri
JCJ. W. Chow
J. W. Chow
MZM. J. Zervos
M. J. Zervos
We evaluated the molecular mechanism for resistance of 360 enterococci for which the gentamicin MICs were ≥128 μg/ml. The aac(6′)-Ie-aph(2")-Ia , aph(2")-Ic , and aph(2")-Id genes were identified by PCR in isolates from animals, food, and humans. The aph(2")-Ib gene was not identified in any of the isolates. Two Enterococcus faecalis isolates (MICs > 1,024 μg/ml) from animals failed to generate a PCR product for any of the genes tested and likely contain a new unidentified aminoglycoside resistance gene. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis showed a diversity of strains. However, 1 human and 18 pork E. faecalis isolates from Michigan with the aac(6′)-Ie-aph(2")-Ia gene had related PFGE patterns and 2 E. faecalis isolates from Oregon (1 human and 1 grocery store chicken isolate) had indistinguishable PFGE patterns. We found that when a gentamicin-resistant gene was present in resistant enterococci from animals, that gene was also present in enterococci isolated from food products of the same animal species. Although these data indicate much diversity among gentamicin-resistant enterococci, the data also suggest similarities in gentamicin resistance among enterococci isolated from humans, retail food, and farm animals from geographically diverse areas and provide evidence of the spread of gentamicin-resistant enterococci from animals to humans through the food supply.

4 January 2021 in JAMA Network Open
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
FAFrederick Angulo
Frederick Angulo
LFLyn Finelli
Lyn Finelli
DSDavid L. Swerdlow
David L. Swerdlow
Estimates of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections are needed to understand how interventions can be titrated to reopen society.1 Seroprevalence data provide an estimate of the proportion of the population who has been infected, and these data can be used for monitoring progress toward herd immunity. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicates that there have been 10 846 373 reported coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases and 244 810 deaths in the US through November 15, 2020 with 1 037 962 reported cases within the last 7 days of that date (an average of 148 280 reported cases per day).2 The number of reported cases is an underestimate of the true number of persons with infection because many persons with symptomatic COVID-19 either do not seek medical care or are not tested and therefore are not included in tallies of COVID-19 infections reported to public health authorities.3 Furthermore, an estimated 40% of individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection are asymptomatic and unlikely to be tested and reported.4 In this study, data from seroprevalence surveys were used to adjust for underreporting of COVID-19 infections and thereby derive estimates of the number of SARS-CoV-2 infections, symptomatic infections, hospitalizations, and deaths in the US as of November 15, 2020.

17 October 2023 in Vaccine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FAFrederick Angulo
Frederick Angulo
PZPingping Zhang
Pingping Zhang
KHKate Halsby
Kate Halsby
PKPatrick Kelly
Patrick Kelly
APAndreas Pilz
Andreas Pilz
LJLuis Jodar
Luis Jodar
Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is an infectious disease caused by the tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) in patients with symptoms of central nervous system (CNS) inflammation. More than 25 European countries have one or more TBE-endemic areas. Although two TBE vaccines, FSME-IMMUN® and Encepur®, are commonly used in Europe, there are no published reviews of the real-world effectiveness of TBE vaccines in Europe or elsewhere. We searched PubMed for TBE vaccine effectiveness (VE) articles and extracted information on country, study design, study period, study population, number of TBEV-infected cases, number of participants, and VE against TBEV infection and outcomes. We identified 13 studies, conducted in Austria, the Czech Republic, Latvia, Germany, and Switzerland, published in 2003-2023. One study was a cohort investigation of a milk-borne outbreak. In the other studies, 11 (91.7%) used the screening method and two (16.7%) used a case-control design (one study used both). TBE vaccines were highly effective (VE estimates >92%) against TBEV infection in all age groups. Vaccines were also highly protective against mild infections (i.e., infections in patients without symptoms of CNS inflammation), and against infections resulting in TBE and hospitalization. Vaccines were also highly protective against the most serious outcomes such as hospitalization greater than 12 days. Product-specific VE estimates were also high, though limited data were available. Studies in Austria, the Czech Republic, Latvia, and Switzerland estimated that TBE vaccines prevented >1,000 TBE cases a year, avoiding many hospitalizations and deaths, in these countries combined. Published VE studies demonstrate a high real-world effectiveness of the commercially available TBE vaccines in Europe. Although cases averted have been estimated in only four countries, TBE vaccination prevents thousands of cases in Europe each year. To prevent life-threatening TBE, TBE vaccine uptake and compliance with the vaccination schedule should be increased in residents of, and travelers to, TBE-endemic countries in Europe.

29 November 2021 in eClinicalMedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSShepherd R. Singer
Shepherd R. Singer
FAFrederick Angulo
Frederick Angulo
DSDavid L. Swerdlow
David L. Swerdlow
JMJohn M. McLaughlin
John M. McLaughlin
IHItay Hazan
Itay Hazan
SASharon Alroy-Preis
Sharon Alroy-Preis
SARS-CoV-2 variant Beta (B.1.351) was designated as a Variant of Concern (VoC) after becoming the dominant strain in South Africa and spreading internationally. BNT162b2 showed lower levels of neutralizing antibodies against Beta than against other strains raising concerns about effectiveness of vaccines against infections caused by Beta. We estimated BNT162b2 vaccine effectiveness (VE) against Beta infections in Israel, a country with high vaccine uptake. The Ministry of Health (MoH) identified Beta cases through mandatory reporting of SARS-CoV-2 cases and whole genome sequencing (WGS) of specimens from vaccination-breakthrough infections, reinfections, arriving international travelers, and a selection of other infected persons. A cohort analysis was conducted of exposure events of contacts of primary Beta cases. WGS was conducted on available PCR-positive specimens collected from contacts. VE estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) against confirmed and probable Beta infections were determined by comparing infection risk between unvaccinated and fully-vaccinated (≥7 days after the second dose) contacts, and between unvaccinated and partially-vaccinated (<7 days after the second dose) contacts. MoH identified 310 Beta cases through Jun 27, 2021. During the study period (Dec 11, 2020 – Mar 25, 2021), 164 non-institutionalized primary Beta cases, with 552 contacts aged ≥16 years, were identified. 343/552 (62%) contacts were interviewed and tested. 71/343 (21%) contacts were PCR-positive. WGS was performed on 7/71 (10%) PCR-positive specimens; all were Beta. Among SARS-CoV-2-infected contacts, 48/71 (68%) were symptomatic, 10/71 (14%) hospitalized, and 2/71 (3%) died. Fully-vaccinated VE against confirmed or probable Beta infections was 72% (95% CI -5 – 97%; p=0·04) and against symptomatic confirmed or probable Beta infections was 100% (95% CI 19 – 100%; p=0·01). There was no evidence of protection in partially-vaccinated contacts. In a prospective observational study, two doses of BNT162b2 were effective against confirmed and probable Beta infections. Through the end of June 2021, introductions of Beta did not interrupt control of the pandemic in Israel. Israel Ministry of Health and Pfizer.

21 June 2024 in Anaerobe
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FAFrederick Angulo
Frederick Angulo
MFMelissa Furtado
Melissa Furtado
EGElisa Gonzalez
Elisa Gonzalez
PZPingping Zhang
Pingping Zhang
PKPatrick H. Kelly
Patrick H. Kelly
JMJennifer C. Moïsi
Jennifer C. Moïsi
Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Data from public health surveillance systems are important for estimating country-level CDI burden. CDI surveillance can be population-based or hospital-based. Population-based surveillance results in overall estimates of CDI incidence (cases per 100,000 population-per-year), and hospital-based surveillance results in estimates of hospital-based CDI incidence (cases per 10,000 patient-days) or CDI admission rates (cases per 1,000 admissions). We sought to better understand temporal trends in CDI incidence reported in publicly available surveillance data worldwide and describe varying surveillance methods. We identified 13 countries in Europe, North America, and Oceania with publicly available population-based and/or hospital-based CDI surveillance data in online reports and/or dashboards. Additional countries in Europe, in particular, also conduct hospital-based CDI surveillance. Inconsistent CDI case definitions and surveillance approaches between countries limit the interpretability of multi-country comparisons. Nonetheless, publicly available CDI surveillance data enabled us to compare CDI incidence among countries with population-based and/or hospital-based surveillance systems and to describe trends in CDI incidence within countries over time. The highest CDI incidence is in the United States. While there have been recent declines in CDI incidence in all countries, the CDI burden remains high, and the need persists for CDI prevention strategies in communities and healthcare settings.

20 September 2024 in International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
FAFrederick Angulo
Frederick Angulo
ECEmily Colby
Emily Colby
ALAnne-Mette Lebech
Anne-Mette Lebech
PLPer-Eric Lindgren
Per-Eric Lindgren
Anna Moniuszko-MalinowskaAnna Moniuszko-Malinowska
Anna Moniuszko-Malinowska
JSJames H. Stark
James H. Stark
To better understand the Lyme borreliosis (LB) burden in Europe, we aimed to estimate the incidence of symptomatic Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (Bbsl) infections after adjusting public health LB surveillance data for under-detection of symptomatic Bbsl infections. Data from seroprevalence studies and estimates of the symptomatic proportion and duration of antibody detection in Bbsl-infected individuals, derived from reviews of the published literature, were used to adjust public health LB surveillance data to estimate the incidence of symptomatic Bbsl infection in nine European countries from 2018-2022. The prevalence of anti-Bbsl antibodies ranged from 2.3% in Romania to 9.4% in Germany. Under-detection multipliers varied across surveillance systems; using 10-year duration of antibody detection, multipliers were 2.4-10.5 in countries reporting all LB cases and 54.6-722.2 in countries reporting only Lyme neuroborreliosis cases. The incidence of symptomatic Bbsl infection adjusted for under-detection was highest in Finland, Germany, Norway, Poland, and Switzerland, intermediate in the Czech Republic and Denmark, and lowest in Ireland and Romania. Adjustment of LB surveillance for under-detection found a high incidence of symptomatic Bbsl infection in several European countries. Differences in LB surveillance systems should be considered when comparing surveillance data between countries and when estimating LB disease burden.