There has been an increase in reported TBE cases in Europe since 2015, reaching a peak in some countries in 2020, highlighting the need for better management of TBE risk in Europe. TBE surveillance is currently limited, in part, due to varying diagnostic guidelines, access to testing, and awareness of TBE. Consequently, TBE prevalence is underestimated and vaccination recommendations inadequate. TBE vaccine uptake is unsatisfactory in many TBE-endemic European countries. This review summarizes the findings of a scientific workshop of experts to improve TBE surveillance and vaccine uptake in Europe. Strategies to improve TBE surveillance and vaccine uptake should focus on: aligning diagnostic criteria and testing across Europe; expanding current vaccine recommendations and reducing their complexity; and increasing public education of the potential risks posed by TBEV infection.

Vaccination as a highly effective measure to protect against tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) comes into new focus as known risk areas are expanding across Europe and Asia. Here we present an online household survey conducted in 20 European countries spanning endemic and non-endemic regions of TBE in 2020. With a comprehensive and standardized list of questions, this survey provided a unique opportunity to compare TBE/TBE vaccine awareness, TBE severity perception, vaccine uptake, vaccination completeness/compliance and motivators/barriers for vaccination across Europe. Among the 51,478 participants, tetanus- (72-92%), influenza- (83-98%), and measles-awareness (79-96%) were highest, but awareness was low for Lyme borreliosis, bacterial meningitis and pneumococcal pneumonia. Awareness towards TBE and a TBE vaccine was 74% and 56% in endemic countries, respectively, compared to 30% and 12% in non-endemic countries. Vaccine uptake defined as at least one TBE vaccination was found to be highly heterogenous across both endemic (range 7-81%) and non-endemic countries (range 1-8%). Compliance with the recommended vaccination schedule was 21% for the primary vaccination series and dropped to 7% for the first booster vaccination in endemic countries. The percentage of participants protected against TBE by vaccination at the time of the survey ranged from 21% in Slovakia to 69% in Lithuania. The perception of personal risk or lack thereof was found to be the most influencing factor for and against TBE vaccination. Overall, these data indicate highly heterogenous responses in different European countries regarding not only awareness towards a TBE vaccine, but also regarding TBE vaccine uptake and compliance. Regionally focused strategies to increase diagnostic completeness as well as TBE vaccination are needed across Europe.

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is an infectious disease caused by the tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) in patients with symptoms of central nervous system (CNS) inflammation. More than 25 European countries have one or more TBE-endemic areas. Although two TBE vaccines, FSME-IMMUN® and Encepur®, are commonly used in Europe, there are no published reviews of the real-world effectiveness of TBE vaccines in Europe or elsewhere. We searched PubMed for TBE vaccine effectiveness (VE) articles and extracted information on country, study design, study period, study population, number of TBEV-infected cases, number of participants, and VE against TBEV infection and outcomes. We identified 13 studies, conducted in Austria, the Czech Republic, Latvia, Germany, and Switzerland, published in 2003-2023. One study was a cohort investigation of a milk-borne outbreak. In the other studies, 11 (91.7%) used the screening method and two (16.7%) used a case-control design (one study used both). TBE vaccines were highly effective (VE estimates >92%) against TBEV infection in all age groups. Vaccines were also highly protective against mild infections (i.e., infections in patients without symptoms of CNS inflammation), and against infections resulting in TBE and hospitalization. Vaccines were also highly protective against the most serious outcomes such as hospitalization greater than 12 days. Product-specific VE estimates were also high, though limited data were available. Studies in Austria, the Czech Republic, Latvia, and Switzerland estimated that TBE vaccines prevented >1,000 TBE cases a year, avoiding many hospitalizations and deaths, in these countries combined. Published VE studies demonstrate a high real-world effectiveness of the commercially available TBE vaccines in Europe. Although cases averted have been estimated in only four countries, TBE vaccination prevents thousands of cases in Europe each year. To prevent life-threatening TBE, TBE vaccine uptake and compliance with the vaccination schedule should be increased in residents of, and travelers to, TBE-endemic countries in Europe.

Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases

Lyme borreliosis (LB) is the most common tick-borne disease in Germany. Although the incidence of LB in Germany has been assessed in several studies, those studies either used data from statutory surveillance, which frequently underreport cases, or data from health claims databases, which may overestimate cases due to non-specific LB case definitions. Here, using a more specific case definition, we describe the incidence of medically-attended LB by disease manifestation, age group, and federal state for the period 2015-2019. Both inpatient and outpatient cases were analyzed from a claims database. To be eligible for inclusion, patients were required to have an LB specific ICD-10 GM diagnosis code plus an antibiotic prescription, and for disseminated manifestations, a laboratory test order additionally. LB cases were classified as erythema migrans (EM), or disseminated disease including Lyme arthritis (LA), Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB), and all other disease manifestations (OTH). Between 2015 and 2019, the incidence of medically-attended LB cases ranged from 195.7/100,000 population per year (95% confidence interval [CI], 191.0 - 200.5) to 254.5/100,000 population per year (95% CI, 249.0 - 260.0) per year. The majority of cases (92.2%) were EM, while 2.8% presented as LA, 3.8% as LNB, and 1.2% as OTH. For both EM and disseminated disease, the incidence peaked in children aged 5-9 years and in older adults. By federal state, the incidence of medically-attended EM ranged from 74.4/100,000 population per year (95% CI, 71.9 - 77.0) per year in Hamburg, to 394.1/100,000 population per year (95% CI, 370.7 - 417.6) per year in Saxony, whereas for medically-attended disseminated disease, the highest incidence was in Thuringia, Saxony, and Bavaria (range: 22.0 [95% CI, 19.9 - 24.0] to 35.7 [95% CI, 34.7 - 36.7] per 100,000 population per year). This study comprehensively estimated the incidence of all manifestations of medically-attended LB and showed a high incidence of LB throughout Germany. Results from the study support performing epidemiological studies in all federal states to measure the burden of LB and to invest in public health interventions for prevention.

Introduction: Lyme borreliosis (LB) is a growing public health concern requiring accurate and comprehensive epidemiological knowledge to inform health care interventions. This study compared the epidemiology of LB in primary care and hospital settings, using for the first time in France three sources of data, and highlighted specific populations at higher risk of developing LB. Methods: This study analyzed data from general practitioner networks ( i.e ., Sentinel network, Electronic Medical Records [EMR]) and the national hospital discharge database to describe the LB epidemiology from 2010 to 2019. Results: The average annual incidence rates of LB in primary care increased from 42.3 cases/100,000 population in 2010–2012 to 83.0/100,000 in 2017–2019 for the Sentinel Network and 42.7/100,000 to 74.6/100,000 for the EMR, following a marked rise in 2016. The annual hospitalization rate remained stable from 2012 to 2019 fluctuating between 1.6 and 1.8 hospitalizations/100,000. Women were more likely to present with LB in primary care setting compared with men (male-to-female incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.92), whereas men were predominant among hospitalizations (IRR = 1.4), with the largest discordance among adolescents aged 10–14 years (IRR = 1.8) and adults aged 80 years and older (IRR = 2.5). In 2017–2019, the average annual incidence rate peaked among persons aged 60–69 years in primary care (>125/100,000) and aged 70–79 years among hospitalized patients (3.4/100,000). A second peak occurred in children aged 0–4 or 5–9 years depending on sources. Incidence rates in Limousin and the north-eastern regions were the highest for both primary care and hospital settings. Conclusions: Analyses showed disparities in the evolution of incidence, sex-specific incidence rates, and predominant age groups between primary care and hospital settings that merit further exploration.