Emma Doyle

Dr. Emma Doyle


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 April 2024 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EDEmma Doyle
Emma Doyle
AKAngus J. Killean
Angus J. Killean
SHStephen Harrow
Stephen Harrow
IPIain D. Phillips
Iain D. Phillips

7 December 2018 in BJU International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EDEmma Doyle
Emma Doyle
JCJeremy Crew
Jeremy Crew
HMHugh Mostafid
Hugh Mostafid
MTMark Tuthill
Mark Tuthill
VCVincenzo Cerundolo
Vincenzo Cerundolo
APAndrew Protheroe
Andrew Protheroe

29 January 2024 in Lung Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMark Stares
Mark Stares
EDEmma Doyle
Emma Doyle
SCSally Chapple
Sally Chapple
GRGeorge Raynes
George Raynes
JMJames MacDonald
James MacDonald
IPIain Philips
Iain Philips

3 September 2024 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MTMichael J. Trimpl
Michael J. Trimpl
SCSorcha Campbell
Sorcha Campbell
NPNiki Panakis
Niki Panakis
DADaniel Ajzensztejn
Daniel Ajzensztejn
EBEmma Burke
Emma Burke
MGMark J. Gooding
Mark J. Gooding
To evaluate the impact of a deep learning (DL)-assisted interactive contouring tool on inter-observer variability and the time taken to complete tumour contouring. Nine clinicians contoured the gross tumour volume (GTV) using the PET-CT scans of 10 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, either using DL-assisted or manual contouring tools. After contouring a case using one contouring method, the same case was contoured one week later using the other method. The contours and time taken were compared. Use of the DL-assisted tool led to a statistically significant decrease in active contouring time of 23 % relative to the standard manual segmentation method (p < 0.01). The mean observation time for all clinicians and cases made up nearly 60 % of interaction time for both contouring approaches. On average the time spent contouring per case was reduced from 22 min to 19 min when using the DL-assisted tool. Additionally, the DL-assisted tool reduced contour variability in the parts of tumour where clinicians tended to disagree the most, while the consensus contour was similar whichever of the two contouring approaches was used. A DL-assisted interactive contouring approach decreased active contouring time and local inter-observer variability when used to delineate lung cancer GTVs compared to a standard manual method. Integration of this tool into the clinical workflow could assist clinicians in contouring tasks and improve contouring efficiency.

18 May 2010 in Breast Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Fiona FurlongFiona Furlong
Fiona Furlong
Maria PrencipeMaria Prencipe
Maria Prencipe
AMA McGoldrick
A McGoldrick
PMP McGettigan
P McGettigan
DCD Carney
D Carney
AMAmanda McCann
Amanda McCann