Hormone-refractory prostate cancer remains hindered by inevitable progression of resistance to first-line treatment with docetaxel. Recent studies suggest that phenotypic changes associated with cancer may be transferred from cell-to-cell via microvesicles/exosomes. Here we aimed to investigate phenotypic changes associated with docetaxel-resistance in order to help determine the complexity of this problem and to assess the relevance of secreted exosomes in prostate cancer. Docetaxel-resistant variants of DU145 and 22Rv1 were established and characterised in terms of cross-resistance, morphology, proliferation, motility, invasion, anoikis, colony formation, exosomes secretion their and functional relevance. Preliminary analysis of exosomes from relevant serum specimens was also performed. Acquired docetaxel-resistance conferred cross-resistance to doxorubicin and induced alterations in motility, invasion, proliferation and anchorage-independent growth. Exosomes expelled from DU145 and 22Rv1 docetaxel-resistant variants (DU145RD and 22Rv1RD) conferred docetaxel-resistance to DU145, 22Rv1 and LNCap cells, which may be partly due to exosomal MDR-1/P-gp transfer. Exosomes from prostate cancer patients’ sera induced increased cell proliferation and invasion, compared to exosomes from age-matched controls. Furthermore, exosomes from sera of patients undergoing a course of docetaxel treatment compared to matched exosomes from the same patients prior to commencing docetaxel treatment, when applied to both DU145 and 22Rv1 cells, showed a correlation between cellular response to docetaxel and patients’ response to treatment with docetaxel. Our studies indicate the complex and multifaceted nature of docetaxel-resistance in prostate cancer. Furthermore, our in vitro observations and preliminary clinical studies indicate that exosomes may play an important role in prostate cancer, in cell-cell communication, and thus may offer potential as vehicles containing predictive biomarkers and new therapeutic targets.

There is no effective treatment strategy for advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer. Although Docetaxel (Taxotere®) represents the most active chemotherapeutic agent it only gives a modest survival advantage with most patients eventually progressing because of inherent or acquired drug resistance. The aims of this study were to further investigate the mechanisms of resistance to Docetaxel. Three Docetaxel resistant sub-lines were generated and confirmed to be resistant to the apoptotic and anti-proliferative effects of increasing concentrations of Docetaxel.

Docetaxel is the main treatment for advanced castration‐resistant prostate cancer; however, resistance eventually occurs. The development of intratumoral drug‐resistant subpopulations possessing a cancer stem cell (CSC) morphology is an emerging mechanism of docetaxel resistance, a process driven by epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT). This study characterised EMT in docetaxel‐resistant sublines through increased invasion, MMP‐1 production and ZEB1 and ZEB2 expression. We also present evidence for differential EMT across PC‐3 and DU145 in vitro resistance models as characterised by differential migration, cell colony scattering and susceptibility to the CSC inhibitor salinomycin. siRNA manipulation of ZEB1 and ZEB2 in PC‐3 and DU145 docetaxel‐resistant sublines identified ZEB1, through its transcriptional repression of E‐cadherin, to be a driver of both EMT and docetaxel resistance. The clinical relevance of ZEB1 was also determined through immunohistochemical tissue microarray assessment, revealing significantly increased ZEB1 expression in prostate tumours following docetaxel treatment. This study presents evidence for a role of ZEB1, through its transcriptional repression of E‐cadherin to be a driver of both EMT and docetaxel resistance in docetaxel‐resistant prostate cancer. In addition, this study highlights the heterogeneity of prostate cancer and in turn emphasises the complexity of the clinical management of docetaxel‐resistant prostate cancer.

Purpose: In an effort to additionally determine the global patterns of CpG island hypermethylation in sporadic breast cancer, we searched for aberrant promoter methylation at 10 gene loci in 54 primary breast cancer and 10 breast benign lesions. Experimental Design: Genomic DNA sodium bisulfate converted from benign and malignant tissues was used as template in methyl-specific PCR for BRCA1, p16, ESR1, GSTP1, TRβ1, RARβ2, HIC1, APC, CCND2, and CDH1 genes. Results: The majority of the breast cancer (85%) showed aberrant methylation in at least 1 of the loci tested with half of them displaying 3 or more methylated genes. The highest frequency of aberrant promoter methylation was found for HIC1 (48%) followed by ESR1 (46%), and CDH1 (39%). Similar methylation frequencies were detected for breast benign lesions with the exception of the CDH1 gene (P = 0.02). The analysis of methylation distribution indicates a statistically significant association between methylation of the ESR1 promoter, and methylation at CDH1, TRβ1, GSTP1, and CCND2 loci (P < 0.03). Methylated status of the BRCA1 promoter was inversely correlated with methylation at the RARβ2 locus (P < 0.03). Conclusions: Our results suggest a nonrandom distribution for promoter hypermethylation in sporadic breast cancer, with tumor subsets characterized by aberrant methylation of specific cancer-related genes. These breast cancer subgroups may represent separate biological entities with potential differences in sensitivity to therapy, occurrence of metastasis, and overall prognosis.

Aberrant promoter methylation of several known or putative tumor suppressor genes occurs frequently during carcinogenesis, and this epigenetic change has been considered as a potential molecular marker for cancer. We examined the methylation status of nine genes (APC, CDH1, CTNNB1, TIMP3, ESR1, GSTP1, MGMT, THBS1, and TMS1), by quantitative methylation specific PCR. Synchronous preinvasive lesions (atypical ductal hyperplasia and/or ductal carcinoma in situ) and invasive ductal breast carcinoma from 52 patients, together with pure lesions from 24 patients and 12 normal tissues paired to tumor and 20 normal breast distant from tumor were analyzed. Aberrant promoter methylation was detected in both preinvasive and invasive lesions for genes APC, CDH1, CTNNB1, TIMP3, ESR1, and GSTP1. However, hierarchical mixed model and Generalized Estimating Equations model analyses showed that only APC, CDH1, and CTNNB1 promoter regions showed a higher frequency and methylation levels in pathologic samples when compared with normal breast. Whereas APC and CTNNB1 did not show differences in methylation levels or frequencies, CDH1 showed higher methylation levels in invasive tumors as compared with preinvasive lesions (P < 0.04, Mann-Whitney test with permutation correction). The analysis of APC, CDH1, and CTNNB1 methylation status was able to distinguish between normal and pathologic samples with a sensitivity of 67% (95% confidence interval, 60-71%) and a specificity of 75% (95% confidence interval, 69-81%). Our data point to the direct involvement of APC, CDH1, and CTNNB1 promoter methylation in the early stages of breast cancer progression and suggest that they may represent a useful tool for the detection of tumor cells in clinical specimens. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009;18(10):2694–700)

While conventional cancer treatments, such as surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, have been combined for decades in an effort to treat cancer patients, the emergence of novel fields of cancer research have led to a renewed interest in combining conventional treatments with more innovative approaches. The realisation that cancer progression is not exclusively due to changes in the cancer epithelial cells, but also involves changes in the tumour microenvironment, has opened new avenues for combination treatments. Here we discuss the use of combination therapies presented at the 55th Irish Association for Cancer Research (IACR) Annual Conference, highlighting examples of novel therapeutic strategies which, combined with conventional therapies, may greatly enhance not only the overall outcome for patients, but also the quality of life for cancer survivors. Among the novel treatment strategies, immune metabolism, epigenetic therapies and physical exercise are presented. In addition, novel technologies in the field of precision medicine, which will be useful to discover new therapeutics and to stratify patients for combination treatments, are also discussed.