Empirical evidence on how ownership type affects the quality and cost of medical care is growing, and debate on these topics is ongoing. Despite the fact that the private sector is a major provider of hospital services in Greece, little comparative information on private versus public sector hospitals is available. The aim of the present study was to describe and compare the operation and performance of private for-profit (PFP) and public hospitals in Greece, focusing on differences in nurse staffing rates, average lengths of stay (ALoS), and Social Health Insurance (SHI) payments for hospital care per patient discharged.

Background/Aim: COVID-19 has dramatically impacted non-pandemic-related care, including preventive medicine. Our objective was to quantify the alterations in the volume of screening tests for breast and cervical cancer during the COVID-19 era compared to pre-pandemic levels. Secondarily, we discussed the causes responsible for this change, presented suggestions for screening optimization and conducted a targeted search of the relevant literature for worsening of future mortality due to screening setback. Materials and Methods: We systematically searched Pubmed, Google Scholar and Epistemonikos for articles in English or Greek, published from March 11th, 2020, until September 14th, 2022, that illustrated quantitative variations of mammograms or Pap/HPV tests. Preprint articles, editorials and speeches were excluded. Quality of included studies was assessed via the JBI critical appraisal checklist for studies reporting prevalence data. The evidence was narratively synthesized. Results: A total of 56 articles were included, being either observational studies or reports from cancer registries. Large reductions were universally identified, peaked during the first wave but partially persisted after easing of the restrictions. Conclusion: Our systematic review provides an updated record of the variations in screening volume and approaches screening neglect from a multidimensional perspective answering why it happened and how we could achieve recovery. A strong awareness campaign is proposed, in conjunction with triaging citizens more likely to benefit from screening. Cervical self-sampling is emphasized in the literature. Various studies displayed a potential increase in cancer mortality in the future based on predictive statistical models.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia and a growing global health burden, yet conventional monitoring with Holter devices, event recorders and implantable loop recorders often fails to adequately capture recurrence. Rapid advances in digital health, wearable biosensors and artificial intelligence (AI) have transformed consumer smartwatches and wearables into potential clinical tools capable of continuous, real-world rhythm surveillance. This narrative review synthesizes contemporary evidence on smartwatch-based AF monitoring, spanning core technologies—photoplethysmography, single-lead electrocardiography and AI fusion algorithms—and validation studies across post-ablation follow-up. Compared with traditional modalities, smartwatch-based AF monitoring demonstrates improved detection of AF recurrence, enhanced characterization of AF burden, symptom–rhythm correlation, and greater patient engagement. At the same time, key limitations are critically examined, including motion artifacts, false-positive alerts, short recording windows, adherence dependence, digital literacy and access gaps, as well as unresolved issues around regulation, interoperability and data privacy. By integrating engineering advances with guideline-directed care pathways, smartwatch-based AF monitoring holds promise to complement, rather than immediately replace, established diagnostic tools and to enable more proactive, individualized AF management. Future work must focus on robust clinical validation, equitable implementation and clear regulatory frameworks to safely scale these technologies.

Background/Objective: Worldwide, ~45% of hypertensives remain undiagnosed, and ~26% are adequately controlled. The active involvement of all healthcare professionals in diagnosing hypertension at primary health care units (PHCUs) is linked to better blood pressure (BP) control. There is currently no research examining the potential role of senior medical students in the diagnosis of hypertension. This study aimed to evaluate the contribution of final-year medical students’ active participation in the diagnosis of hypertension. The study also examined the prevalence and control of hypertension among health service users in Greek PHCUs. Methods: This is a cross-sectional convenience sample study. During clinical placement in PHC, sixth-year medical students received systematic training and performed BP measurements, according to the guidelines, in private, well-organized spaces. Adult patients and visitors were enlisted for BP measurements. The BP readings were provided to the participants so they could discuss any concerns about their BP with their physician. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies. Continuous variables were assessed for normality and, based on their distribution, are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range). Appropriate tests were performed for the comparisons across groups (chi-square for the categorical variables, and two-sample t-test or Mann–Whitney test for continuous variables). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: In the present study, 124 medical students performed BP measurements in 68 PHCUs. BP was measured in 704 individuals, aged 61 (IQR: 48.0–73.0) years old; 58.8% were female, 68.3% of whom were patients. The prevalence of hypertension was 56.7%. The control rate was 44.9% (BP < 140 and 90 mmHg among all hypertensives), and the control rate under treatment was 61.0% (BP < 140 and 90 mmHg among treated hypertensives). The involvement of medical students contributed positively, increasing the diagnosis of hypertension in individuals who might not have their BP measured in routine clinical practice. Ninety-nine newly diagnosed hypertensives were detected. Students identified 220 uncontrolled hypertensives and 112 uncontrolled under-treated patients, who were then referred to the consultant physicians. Conclusions: Students played a critical role in diagnosing hypertension and identifying newly diagnosed hypertensive patients. Embracing interprofessional care in the diagnosis and management of hypertension is essential for achieving better outcomes for our patients. Engaging medical students in BP measurements is a practical and feasible approach to improve hypertension diagnosis and control, taking into consideration the increased workload of PHC physicians. While this action has important medical education implications, the impact on the knowledge level of medical students was not evaluated. Limitations of this study include the assessment of BP in one visit without home BP measurements or a second visit, lack of follow-up of newly diagnosed hypertensives, and the low average number of BP measurements per student.