SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, has revealed a broader impact beyond the respiratory system, predominantly affecting the vascular system with various adverse manifestations. The infection induces endothelial dysfunction and immune system dysregulation, creating an inflammatory and hypercoagulable state. It affects both microvasculature and macrovasculature, leading to thromboembolic events, cardiovascular manifestations, impaired arterial stiffness, cerebrovascular complications, and nephropathy, as well as retinopathy—frequently observed in cases of severe illness. Evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 infection may result in persistent effects on the vascular system, identified as long-term COVID-19. This is characterized by prolonged inflammation, endotheliopathy, and an increased risk of vascular complications. Various imaging modalities, histopathological studies, and diagnostic tools such as video capillaroscopy and magnetic resonance imaging have been employed to visualize vascular alterations. This review aims to comprehensively summarize the evidence concerning short and long-term vascular alterations following COVID-19 infection, investigating their impact on patients’ prognosis, and providing an overview of preventive strategies to mitigate associated vascular complications.

Heart failure (HF) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Recently, significant advances have been made in its treatment; however, diuretics remain the cornerstone in managing congestion in HF. Although diuretic resistance poses a significant challenge in the management of HF and is associated with poor outcomes, only limited alternative pharmaceutical options are available in clinical practice. The objective of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the current evidence on the effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors on diuretic resistance in HF patients. The primary emphasis is placed on clinical data that assess the impact of SGLT-2 inhibitors on fluid balance, symptom improvement, and clinical outcomes and secondarily on safety profile and potential adverse effects associated with SGLT-2 inhibitor use in acute decompensated HF. The current evidence on the efficacy of SGLT-2 on diuretic resistance remains controversial. Findings from observational and randomized studies are quite heterogenous; however, they converge on the notion that although SGLT-2 inhibitors show promise for mitigating diuretic resistance in HF, their diuretic effect may not be potent enough to be widely used to relieve objective signs of congestion in patients with HF. Importantly, the introduction of SGLT-2 inhibitors in HF treatment appears to be generally well tolerated, with manageable adverse effects. Further research is needed to investigate the underlying mechanisms and the possible beneficial impact of SGLT-2 inhibitors on diuretic resistance in HF.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia among adults worldwide, frequently co-occurring with comorbidities such as Heart Failure (HF) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). This association contributes to increased morbidity and mortality, elevated healthcare costs, and diminished quality of life. Consequently, preventing or delaying the onset and recurrence of AF is crucial for reducing the incidence of complications. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is), due to their multifaceted pharmacological actions, have been proposed as potential therapeutic agents in the management of AF. However, current evidence from both animal models and clinical studies remains inconclusive. This narrative literature review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of existing evidence on the impact of SGLT2is on the prevalence, incidence of new-onset, and recurrence of AF in diabetic populations and patients with HF. Numerous observational studies, predominantly retrospective, suggest a consistent reduction in AF risk with SGLT2is, while randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have yielded mixed results, with some demonstrating benefits and others not reaching statistical significance. The heterogeneity in study outcomes, population characteristics, follow-up duration, and specific SGLT2is used, as well as potential biases, underscore the need for further extensive and rigorous RCTs to establish definitive conclusions and elucidate the underlying mechanisms.

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, requiring ongoing efforts to identify novel therapeutic targets to improve patient outcomes. This manuscript reviews promising therapeutic targets for ACS identified through preclinical research, including novel antiplatelet agents, anti-inflammatory drugs, and agents targeting plaque stabilization. Preclinical studies have expounded these agents’ efficacy and safety profiles in mitigating key pathophysiological processes underlying ACS, such as platelet activation, inflammation, and plaque instability. Furthermore, ongoing clinical trials are evaluating the efficacy and safety of these agents in ACS patients, with potential implications for optimizing ACS management. Challenges associated with translating preclinical findings into clinical practice, including patient heterogeneity and trial design considerations, are also discussed. Overall, the exploration of emerging therapeutic targets offers promising avenues for advancing ACS treatment strategies and improving patient outcomes.

Engaging intracoronary imaging (IC) techniques such as intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography enables the precise description of vessel architecture. These imaging modalities have well-established roles in providing guidance and optimizing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) outcomes. Furthermore, IC is increasingly recognized for its diagnostic capabilities, as it has the unique capacity to reveal vessel wall characteristics that may not be apparent through angiography alone. This manuscript thoroughly reviews the contemporary landscape of IC in clinical practice. Focused on current methodologies, the review explores the utility and advancements in IC techniques. Emphasizing their role in clarifying coronary pathophysiology, guiding PCI, and optimizing patient outcomes, the manuscript critically evaluates the strengths and limitations of each modality. Additionally, the integration of IC into routine clinical workflows and its impact on decision-making processes are discussed. By synthesizing the latest evidence, this review provides valuable insights for clinicians, researchers, and healthcare professionals involved in the dynamic field of interventional cardiology.

Background: Novel and accessible biomarkers may add to the existing risk stratification schemes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio (GLR) have emerged as potential indicators of systemic inflammation and metabolic stress, both of which are pivotal in ACS pathophysiology. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of the PLR and GLR in patients with ACS. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with ACS between 2017 and 2023 at Hippokration Hospital of Thessaloniki, Greece. PLR and GLR were calculated from admission blood samples. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Logistic and Cox regression models were used to investigate the associations of PLR and GLR with all-cause mortality. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, Kaplan–Meier survival curves, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) modeling were also applied. Results: In total, 853 patients (median age: 65 years, 72.3% males) were included. Higher PLR and GLR were independently associated with increased risk of long-term mortality [adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) for PLR: 1.007, 95% CI: 1.005–1.008; and for GLR: aOR = 1.006, 95% CI: 1.003–1.008]. The optimal cut-off values were 191.92 for PLR and 66.80 for GLR. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses confirmed significantly reduced survival in patients with GLR and PLR values exceeding these thresholds. RCS analysis revealed non-linear relationships, with mortality risk rising sharply at higher levels of both markers. PLR showed superior prognostic performance (AUC: 0.673, 95% CI: 0.614–0.723) compared to GLR (AUC: 0.602, 95% CI: 0.551–0.653). Conclusions: While PLR demonstrated greater predictive accuracy, both PLR and GLR were consistently associated with mortality and may provide complementary prognostic information. Incorporating those ratios into routine clinical assessment may improve risk stratification, particularly in resource-limited settings or for patients without traditional risk factors.