Sarah McKasson

Ms. Sarah McKasson

Newborn Screening and Genetics, Association of Public Health Laboratories, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
11 September 2020 in MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MSMarci Sontag
Marci Sontag
CYCareema Yusuf
Careema Yusuf
SGScott Grosse
Scott Grosse
SESari Edelman
Sari Edelman
JMJoshua I. Miller
Joshua I. Miller
SSStuart K. Shapira
Stuart K. Shapira
This report describes how newborn screenings in the United States during 2015–2017 identified congenital disorders.

1 October 2013 in American Journal of Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KTKatherine Theall
Katherine Theall
Sarah McKassonSarah McKasson
Sarah McKasson
EMEmily Mabile
Emily Mabile
LDLauren F. Dunaway
Lauren F. Dunaway
SDStacy S. Drury
Stacy S. Drury
We examined the association between telomere length and prenatal tobacco exposure (PTE) in 104 children aged 4 to 14 years. Salivary telomere length (STL) was determined from salivary DNA using quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Of the children, 18% had maternal reported PTE. Mean STL was significantly lower among children with PTE (6.4 vs 7.5, P < .05). Findings extend the literature demonstrating the negative long-term effects of PTE to include a cellular marker of aging linked to multiple negative health outcomes.

2 April 2020 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MSMarci Sontag
Marci Sontag
JMJoshua I Miller
Joshua I Miller
Sarah McKassonSarah McKasson
Sarah McKasson
RSRuthanne Sheller
Ruthanne Sheller
SESari Edelman
Sari Edelman
YKYvonne Kellar-Guenther
Yvonne Kellar-Guenther
Newborn screening (NBS) aims to achieve early identification and treatment of affected infants prior to onset of symptoms. The timely completion of each step (i.e., specimen collection, transport, testing, result reporting), is critical for early diagnosis. Goals developed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services’ Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (ACHDNC) for NBS timeliness were adopted (time-critical results reported by five days of life, and non-time-critical results reported by day seven), and implemented into a multi-year quality improvement initiative (NewSTEPS 360) aimed to decrease the time to result reporting and intervention. The NBS system from specimen collection through reporting of results was assessed (bloodspot specimen collection, specimen shipping, sample testing, and result reporting). Annual data from 25 participating NBS programs were analyzed; the medians (and interquartile range, IQR) of state-specific percent of specimens that met the goal are presented. The percent of specimens collected before 48 hours of life increased from 95% (88–97%) in 2016 to 97% (IQR 92–98%) in 2018 for the 25 states, with 20 (80%) of programs collecting more than 90% of the specimens within 48 hours of birth. Approximately 41% (IQR 29–57%) of specimens were transported within one day of collection. Time-critical result reporting in the first five days of life improved from 49% (IQR 26–74%) in 2016 to 64% (42%-71%) in 2018, and for non-time critical results from 64% (IQR 58%-78%) in 2016 to 81% (IQR 68–91%) in 2018. Laboratories open seven days a week in 2018 reported 95% of time-critical results within five days, compared to those open six days (62%), and five days (45%). NBS programs that participated in NewSTEPs 360 made great strides in improving timeliness; however, ongoing quality improvement efforts are needed in order to ensure all infants receive a timely diagnosis.

12 October 2016 in Journal of Child and Family Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CTCatherine A. Taylor
Catherine A. Taylor
Sarah McKassonSarah McKasson
Sarah McKasson
GHGuenevere Hoy
Guenevere Hoy
WDWilliam DeJong
William DeJong

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAmy Gaviglio
Amy Gaviglio
Sarah McKassonSarah McKasson
Sarah McKasson
SSSikha Singh
Sikha Singh
JOJelili Ojodu
Jelili Ojodu
Newborn screening (NBS) is a state or territory-based public health system that screens newborns for congenital diseases that typically do not present with clinical symptoms at birth but can cause significant mortality and morbidity if not detected or treated quickly. NBS continues to be one of the most successful public health interventions in the US, providing early detection and intervention to all infants. The increase in overall birth prevalence of core Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) diseases detected via dried blood spot (DBS) specimens from 2015–2017 (17.50–18.31 per 10,000) to 2018–2020 (20.07 per 10,000), as reported into the APHL NewSTEPs database, affirms the importance and impact of NBS programs. This report presents aggregate numbers and birth prevalence of diseases detected by DBS on the RUSP from 2018–2020, including data from fifty US states and two territories.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YKYvonne Kellar-Guenther
Yvonne Kellar-Guenther
Sarah McKassonSarah McKasson
Sarah McKasson
KHKshea Hale
Kshea Hale
SSSikha Singh
Sikha Singh
MSMarci Sontag
Marci Sontag
JOJelili Ojodu
Jelili Ojodu
Data were collected from 39 newborn screening (NBS) programs to provide insight into the time and factors required for implementing statewide screening for Pompe, Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I), adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), and Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). Newborn screening program readiness to screen statewide for a condition was assessed using four phases: (1) approval to screen; (2) laboratory, follow-up, and information technology capabilities; (3) education; and (4) implementation of statewide newborn screening. Seventeen states (43.6%) reached statewide implementation for at least one new disorder. Those states reported that it took 28 months to implement statewide screening for Pompe and MPS I, 30.5 months for ALD, and 20 months for SMA. Using survival curve analysis to account for states still in progress, the estimated median time to statewide screening increased to 75 months for Pompe and 66 months for MPS I. When looking at how long each readiness component took to complete, laboratory readiness was one of the lengthier processes, taking about 39 months. Collaboration with other NBS programs and hiring were the most frequently mentioned facilitators to implementing newborn screening. Staffing or inability to hire both laboratory and follow-up staff was the most frequently mentioned barrier.