Shereef Bankole

Dr. Shereef Bankole

Institue of GeoEnergy Engineering
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 August 2017 in Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Jim BuckmanJim Buckman
Jim Buckman
SBShereef Bankole
Shereef Bankole
SZStephanie Gabriele Zihms
Stephanie Gabriele Zihms
HLHelen Lewis
Helen Lewis
GCGary Couples
Gary Couples
PCPatrick Corbett
Patrick Corbett
Modern scanning electron microscopes often include software that allows for the possibility of obtaining large format high-resolution image montages over areas of several square centimeters. Such montages are typically automatically acquired and stitched, comprising many thousand individual tiled images. Images, collected over a regular grid pattern, are a rich source of information on factors such as variability in porosity and distribution of mineral phases, but can be hard to visually interpret. Additional quantitative data can be accessed through the application of image analysis. We use backscattered electron (BSE) images, collected from polished thin sections of two limestone samples from the Cretaceous of Brazil, a Carboniferous limestone from Scotland, and a carbonate cemented sandstone from Northern Ireland, with up to 25,000 tiles per image, collecting numerical quantitative data on the distribution of porosity. Images were automatically collected using the FEI software Maps, batch processed by image analysis (through ImageJ), with results plotted on 2D contour plots with MATLAB. These plots numerically and visually clearly express the collected porosity data in an easily accessible form, and have application for the display of other data such as pore size, shape, grain size/shape, orientation and mineral distribution, as well as being of relevance to sandstone, mudrock and other porous media.

1 March 2019 in Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBShereef Bankole
Shereef Bankole
Jim BuckmanJim Buckman
Jim Buckman
DSDorrik Stow
Dorrik Stow
HLHelen Lever
Helen Lever

13 April 2019 in Journal of Earth Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SBShereef Bankole
Shereef Bankole
Jim BuckmanJim Buckman
Jim Buckman
DSDorrik Stow
Dorrik Stow
HLHelen Lever
Helen Lever

27 May 2020 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBShereef Bankole
Shereef Bankole
Jim BuckmanJim Buckman
Jim Buckman
DSDorrik Stow
Dorrik Stow
Deep-water contourite muds are an important component of many continental margin systems and are currently the focus of much interest amongst deep-water researchers. One outstanding gap in our knowledge of these systems is to understand and quantify a contourite budget, both at the small (facies) scale and at the larger drift scale. A second problem concerns the establishing of robust criteria for discriminating between contourites and associated deepwater facies—turbidites and hemipelagites. This paper contributes to these topics by detailed examination of sediment composition, with a particular focus on potentially diagnostic components, within contourites and hemipelagites from the same depositional basin. Samples were selected from Pliocene to Quaternary muddy contourites from the Gulf of Cadiz (IODP 339) and examined by scanning electron microscopy. The presence of tunicate spicules, micro-bored shell fragments, and a particular species of coccolithophore, Braarudosphaera biglowii, all indicate derivation from shallow waters and hence lateral off-shelf supply. In contrast, micro-mudclasts and fragmented bioclasts are indicative of alongslope transport in bottom currents. A normal planktic component of the contourite muds shows a significant vertical input from pelagic settling. Such diagnostic components can also help in the discrimination between contourites, turbidites and hemipelagites.

20 June 2021 in Minerals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBShereef Bankole
Shereef Bankole
DSDorrik Stow
Dorrik Stow
ZSZeinab Smillie
Zeinab Smillie
Jim BuckmanJim Buckman
Jim Buckman
HLHelen Lever
Helen Lever
Distinguishing among deep-water sedimentary facies has been a difficult task. This is possibly due to the process continuum in deep water, in which sediments occur in complex associations. The lack of definite sedimentological features among the different facies between hemipelagites and contourites presented a great challenge. In this study, we present detailed mudrock characteristics of the three main deep-water facies based on sedimentological characteristics, laser diffraction granulometry, high-resolution, large area scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the synchrotron X-ray diffraction technique. Our results show that the deep-water microstructure is mainly process controlled, and that the controlling factor on their grain size is much more complex than previously envisaged. Retarding current velocity, as well as the lower carrying capacity of the current, has an impact on the mean size and sorting for the contourite and turbidite facies, whereas hemipelagite grain size is impacted by the natural heterogeneity of the system caused by bioturbation. Based on the microfabric analysis, there is a disparate pattern observed among the sedimentary facies; turbidites are generally bedding parallel due to strong currents resulting in shear flow, contourites are random to semi-random as they are impacted by a weak current, while hemipelagites are random to oblique since they are impacted by bioturbation.

1 January 2017 in Journal of Palaeogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SBShereef Bankole
Shereef Bankole
AOA.O. Ola-Buraimo
A.O. Ola-Buraimo
Biostratigraphy investigation of Nsukka Formation was carried out by subjecting well cutting samples obtained from Nzam-1 well to palynological studies with the view towards determining the relative geologic age and palaeoenvironment of deposition of the sediments. Samples were treated in the laboratory through digestion with hydrofluoric acid, sieving with 5 μm, oxidation with Nitric acid and mounting of the slides into sections with DPX mountant. A fairly high abundance and diversity of miospores were recovered, while the interval (847–1372 m) contains distinctive and diagnostic palynomorphs which are stratigraphically important.A Spinizonocolpites baculatus assemblage zone was established based on the basal occurrence of S. baculatus, Spinizonocolpites echinatus, Constructipollenites ineffectus, Periretisyncolpites sp. Periretisyncolpites giganteus, Monocolpites sp 1, Foveotriletes margaritae, Syncolporites marginatus, and Longapertites marginatus. The upper part of the interval is marked by association of Anacolosidites luidonisis (at top), Mauritiidites crassibaculatus, Retistephanocolpites williamsi, Proteacidites dehaani, Echitriporites trianguliformis, Proxapertites cursus, Retidiporites magdalenensis, S. baculatus, Retitricolpites gigeonetti, F. margaritae and Araucariacites sp. The Nsukka Formation is dated as Late Maastrichtian based on the co-occurrence of recovered index fossils. Importantly, Cretaceous–Tertiary (K/T) boundary is marked by high fossil content in the Maastrichtian sediments compared to paucity in palynomorph that characterise the overlying Paleocene facies. Palaeoenvironment of the analyzed section varies alternately from marginal marine to continental setting based on the presence of land-derived miospores and dinoflagellates