Dorrik Stow

Prof. Dorrik Stow

Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 February 2020 in Geosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DSDorrik Stow
Dorrik Stow
ZSZeinab Smillie
Zeinab Smillie
The distinction between turbidites, contourites and hemipelagites in modern and ancient deep-water systems has long been a matter of controversy. This is partly because the processes themselves show a degree of overlap as part of a continuum, so that the deposit characteristics also overlap. In addition, the three facies types commonly occur within interbedded sequences of continental margin deposits. The nature of these end-member processes and their physical parameters are becoming much better known and are summarised here briefly. Good progress has also been made over the past decade in recognising differences between end-member facies in terms of their sedimentary structures, facies sequences, ichnofacies, sediment textures, composition and microfabric. These characteristics are summarised here in terms of standard facies models and the variations from these models that are typically encountered in natural systems. Nevertheless, it must be acknowledged that clear distinction is not always possible on the basis of sedimentary characteristics alone, and that uncertainties should be highlighted in any interpretation. A three-scale approach to distinction for all deep-water facies types should be attempted wherever possible, including large-scale (oceanographic and tectonic setting), regional-scale (architecture and association) and small-scale (sediment facies) observations.

17 August 2020 in Sedimentology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HHHeiko Hüneke
Heiko Hüneke
FHF. Javier Hernández‐Molina
F. Javier Hernández‐Molina
FRFrancisco J. Rodríguez-Tovar
Francisco J. Rodríguez-Tovar
ELEstefanía Llave
Estefanía Llave
DCDomenico Chiarella
Domenico Chiarella
DSDorrik Stow
Dorrik Stow
Interbedded contourites, turbidites and pelagites are commonplace in many deep‐water slope environments. However, the distinction between these different facies remains a source of controversy. This detailed study of calcareous contourites and associated deep‐marine facies from an Eocene–Miocene sedimentary succession on Cyprus clearly documents the diagnostic value of microfacies in this debate. In particular, the variability of archetypical bi‐gradational contourite sequences and their internal subdivision (bedding, layering and lamination) are explored. Contourites can be distinguished from turbidites, pelagites and hemipelagites by means of carbonate microfacies in combination with bed‐scale characteristics. Particle composition provides valuable information on sediment provenance. Depositional texture, determined by the ratio between carbonate mud and bioclasts, is crucial for identifying bi‐gradational sequences in both muddy and sandy contourites, and normally‐graded sequences in turbidite beds. Equally important are the type and preservation of traction structures, as well as the temporality and impact of bioturbation. Shell fragmentation under conditions of increased hydrodynamic agitation (textural inversion) is recognized as a carbonate‐specific feature of bioclastic sandy contourites.

1 October 2020 in Energy Geoscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DSDorrik Stow
Dorrik Stow
UNUisdean Nicholson
Uisdean Nicholson
SKSamantha Kearsey
Samantha Kearsey
DTDominic Tatum
Dominic Tatum
AGAndy Gardiner
Andy Gardiner
MJMahmoud Jaweesh
Mahmoud Jaweesh

3 December 2019 in Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ELEstefanía Llave
Estefanía Llave
FHF. Javier Hernández-Molina
F. Javier Hernández-Molina
MGMarga García
Marga García
Gemma ErcillaGemma Ercilla
Gemma Ercilla
CRCristina Roque
Cristina Roque
DSDorrik Stow
Dorrik Stow
This work uses seismic records to document and classify contourite features around the Iberian continental margin to determine their implications for depositional systems and petroleum exploration. Contourites include depositional features (separated, sheeted, plastered and confined drifts), erosional features (abraded surfaces, channels, furrows and moats) and mixed features (contourite terraces). Drifts generally show high- to moderate-amplitude reflectors, which are cyclically intercalated with transparent layers. Transparent layers may represent finer-grained deposits, which can serve as seal rocks. High-amplitude reflectors (HARs) are likely to represent sandier layers, which could form hydrocarbon reservoirs. HARs occur on erosive features (moats and channels), and are clearly developed on contourite terraces and overflow features. Most of the contourite features described here are influenced by Mediterranean water masses throughout their Pliocene and Quaternary history. They specifically record Mediterranean Outflow Water, following its exit through the Gibraltar Strait. This work gives a detailed report on the variation of modern contourite deposits, which can help inform ancient contourite reservoir interpretation. Further research correlating 2D and 3D seismic anomalies with core and well-logging data is needed to develop better diagnostic criteria for contourites. This can help to clarify the role of contourites in petroleum systems.


24 May 2022 in Marine Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EIElena V. Ivanova
Elena V. Ivanova
DBDmitrii G. Borisov
Dmitrii G. Borisov
IMIvar O. Murdmaa
Ivar O. Murdmaa
EOEkaterina A. Ovsepyan
Ekaterina A. Ovsepyan
DSDorrik Stow
Dorrik Stow