Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin (IL)-4 receptor alpha subunit and IL-13, has markedly advanced the treatment of atopic conditions such as dermatitis, asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis. However, its expanding use has brought increased attention to a range of ocular adverse events—conjunctivitis, blepharitis, keratitis, corneal ulcers, and cicatricial conjunctivitis—that remain underrecognized and frequently underestimated in clinical practice. These manifestations often emerge in patients with atopic dermatitis and display varying severity, posing diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Rather than isolated phenomena, these effects appear to stem from a complex interplay of goblet cell depletion, mucin deficiency, immune dysregulation, and microbiome alterations, including Demodex proliferation. Current management strategies remain largely empirical, lacking standardized protocols, and are often guided by anecdotal evidence. In this review, we critically appraise the existing literature, synthesize emerging pathogenic hypotheses, and highlight the unmet clinical need for evidence-based treatment algorithms. We advocate for a multidisciplinary approach and future research aimed at elucidating mechanisms, refining risk stratification, and minimizing ocular toxicity without compromising the therapeutic benefits of dupilumab. Furthermore, we intend to provide a more practical and straightforward resource for the reader based on the current literature on approaching the topic.

Autoimmune skin disorders, including Psoriasis, Lichen Planus, Vitiligo, Atopic Dermatitis, and Alopecia Areata, arise from a combination of genetic predisposition, external factors, and immunological dysfunction. It is well-documented that there is a strong correlation between autoimmune thyroid diseases and a range of dermatological disorders, especially urticaria. This review investigates possible links between autoimmune thyroiditis and a broader spectrum of autoimmune skin conditions, analyzing shared genetic markers, immunological mechanisms, and clinical correlations. Common pathogenic mechanisms include disrupted immune tolerance and oxidative stress, leading to chronic inflammation. Genetic factors, such as IL-23 receptor gene variants, increase the risk for Psoriasis, Alopecia Areata, and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Additionally, CTLA-4 mutations enhance susceptibility to autoimmune thyroid and skin disorders. Shared genetic susceptibility was also reported in Lichen Planus and Vitilgo, even if different genetic loci might be involved. The breakdown of the immune system can determine a pro-inflammatory state, facilitating the development of autoimmunity and auto-antibody cross-reactions. The presence of similar antigens in skin cells and thyrocytes might explain why both tissues are affected. The significant overlap between these conditions emphasizes the necessity for a comprehensive diagnosis workup and treatment. Future research should focus on clarifying specific immunological pathways and identifying novel biomarkers.

Background: Idursulfase and laronidase are drugs used to treat Hunter syndrome (mucopolysaccharidosis type 2) and Scheie syndrome (mucopolysaccharidosis type 1 S), respectively. These are rare lysosomal storage disorders, leading to accumulation of glycosaminoglycans within lysosomes. Failure of early recognition of the disease and/or delay in starting the appropriate treatment result in severe clinical impairment and death. For almost 20 years, enzyme replacement therapy with recombinant proteins has represented the first line therapeutic option. However, administration of idursulfase and laronidase is associated with infusion-related hypersensitivity reactions, in approx. 20% of patients. In these patients, rapid desensitization by intravenous administration protocols has been used in order to avoid treatment discontinuation. This approach proved effective and safe. However, long-term tolerance could not be achieved. Thus, we decided to combine rapid desensitization with allergen immunotherapy-like desensitization. Results: Two patients with Hunter syndrome and one patient with Scheie syndrome developed severe allergy to idursulfase and laronidase, respectively, preventing them from continuing the otherwise indispensable therapy. In all three patients, the possible IgE-mediated nature of the reactions suffered was suggested by positive skin tests with the two enzymes, respectively. By devising 12-step, 3-dilution rapid desensitization protocols, we resumed the enzyme replacement therapy. However, the prolonged time required for administration (a not negligible pitfall, since therapy should be given weekly for life) and the persistent occurrence of reactions (mild but still requiring anti-allergic medication at full dosage) led us to combine rapid desensitization with a compact 11-step, 24-day allergen immunotherapy-like desensitization protocol. Thus, idursulfase and laronidase were injected subcutaneously, with a 500-fold increase from step 1 to step 11 for idursulfase and a 222-fold increase for laronidase. This strategy led to restoration of long-term tolerance, allowing weekly intravenous therapy administration under standard conditions, according to the manufacturer instructions, in the absence of side effects and with only precautionary low-dose premedication. Conclusion: Rapid desensitization is a suitable and safe option in the case of idursulfase and laronidase allergy. Combination with subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy-like desensitization afforded restoration of enzyme replacement therapy given by the normal administration schedule, by inducing sustained tolerance.

Lysosomal Storage Diseases (LSDs) encompass a range of genetic disorders characterized by enzyme deficiencies that lead to substrate accumulation and progressive tissue damage. Enzyme Replacement Therapy (ERT) is the primary treatment for LSDs, yet it is often associated with hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), ranging from mild rashes to severe anaphylaxis. These reactions, frequently driven by anti-drug antibodies, pose significant challenges in treatment adherence and patient outcomes. This paper outlines a stepwise approach to managing HSRs during ERT, focusing on three escalating strategies. The first-line approach involves premedication using antihistamines, corticosteroids, antileukotrienes, and bronchodilators to prevent or reduce the severity of HSRs. For patients who continue to experience HSRs despite premedication, desensitization protocols are recommended, involving the gradual reintroduction of ERT in controlled, increasing doses. In cases of refractory HSRs, omalizumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting IgE, has been successfully used as a third-line intervention. This comprehensive, stepwise strategy aims to provide clinicians a guide to manage these challenges, offering practical steps for optimizing treatment while ensuring patient safety. Future research is needed to further validate these management techniques and explore new therapeutic options for optimizing care in this rare but critical patient population.