Sampsa Ruutu

Dr. Sampsa Ruutu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2015 in Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
GHGeorg Holtz
Georg Holtz
FAFloor Alkemade
Floor Alkemade
FHFjalar de Haan
Fjalar de Haan
JKJonathan Köhler
Jonathan Köhler
ETE. (Evelina) Trutnevyte
E. (Evelina) Trutnevyte
SRSampsa Ruutu
Sampsa Ruutu
Societal transitions involve multiple actors, changes in institutions, values and technologies, and interactions across multiple sectors and scales. Given this complexity, this paper takes on the view that the societal transitions research field would benefit from the further maturation and broader uptake of modelling approaches. This paper shows how modelling can enhance the understanding of and support stakeholders to steer societal transitions. It discusses the benefits modelling provides for studying large societal systems and elaborates on different ways models can be used for transitions studies. Two model applications are presented in some detail to illustrate the benefits. Then, limitations of modelling societal transitions are discussed, which leads to an agenda for future activities: (1) better cooperation in the development of dynamic models, (2) stronger interaction with other transition scholars and stakeholders, and (3) use of additional modelling approaches that we think are relevant to and largely unexplored in transitions studies

1 April 2017 in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SRSampsa Ruutu
Sampsa Ruutu
TCThomas Casey
Thomas Casey
VKVille Kotovirta
Ville Kotovirta

1 July 2019 in International Journal of Project Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FPFarzad Pargar
Farzad Pargar
JKJaakko Kujala
Jaakko Kujala
Kirsi AaltonenKirsi Aaltonen
Kirsi Aaltonen
SRSampsa Ruutu
Sampsa Ruutu

3 March 2016 in Strategic Management Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJukka Luoma
Jukka Luoma
SRSampsa Ruutu
Sampsa Ruutu
AKAdelaide Wilcox King
Adelaide Wilcox King
HTHenrikki Tikkanen
Henrikki Tikkanen

1 May 2015 in Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HAHeidi Auvinen
Heidi Auvinen
SRSampsa Ruutu
Sampsa Ruutu
ATAnu Tuominen
Anu Tuominen
TAToni Ahlqvist
Toni Ahlqvist
JOJuha Oksanen
Juha Oksanen

19 April 2023 in Systems
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
EAEktor Arzoglou
Ektor Arzoglou
YKYki Kortesniemi
Yki Kortesniemi
SRSampsa Ruutu
Sampsa Ruutu
TETommi Elo
Tommi Elo
People use social media to achieve particular gratifications despite expressing concerns about the related privacy risks that may lead to negative consequences. This inconsistency between privacy concerns and actual behaviour has been referred to as the privacy paradox. Although several possible explanations for this phenomenon have been provided over the years, they each consider only some of the obstacles that stand in the way of informed and rational privacy decisions, and they usually assume a static situation, thus neglecting the changes taking place over time. To overcome these limitations, this article incorporates all the key privacy obstacles into a qualitative system dynamics model and examines the conditions under which the privacy paradox emerges over time in the context of social media. The results show that the privacy obstacles prevent adequately accounting for the negative consequences by (1) reinforcing gratifications, thus inducing social media adoption and use, while (2) hampering the realisation of (all) negative consequences, thus reducing the motivation for social media discard. Moreover, gratifications kick off early and often seem to dominate even major long-term negative consequences, thereby resulting in users becoming only gradually concerned about privacy, by which time they are usually deeply engaged in the platform to consider discarding, and therefore arriving in a paradoxical situation that seems not viable to escape from (i.e., the boiling frog syndrome). Conversely, major short-term negative consequences are more likely to conflict with gratifications already earlier, thereby resulting in users becoming less engaged, more concerned, and therefore still able to discard the platform, thus resolving the paradoxical situation.