Paul L. Carson

Prof. Paul L. Carson


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

55Years (1972-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 1994 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJ M Rubin
J M Rubin
RBR O Bude
R O Bude
PCPaul L. Carson
Paul L. Carson
RBR L Bree
R L Bree
RAR S Adler
R S Adler
The authors present a preliminary report to demonstrate a new color Doppler (CD) ultrasonography (US) technique called power Doppler (PD), which displays the total integrated Doppler power in color, and to compare PD with CD imaging, which generally displays an estimate of the mean Doppler frequency shift. Two standard commercial US scanners that encode the integrated power in the Doppler signal in color were used to demonstrate PD. A standard nonflow-containing US phantom, a normal right kidney, and a torsive and normal contralateral testis were scanned in the power mode. In the phantom and kidney, results with CD and PD were directly compared. PD does not alias, is relatively angle independent, and displays background noise in a way that increases the usable dynamic range of a US scanner. This extended dynamic range should increase machine sensitivity and may demonstrate increased flow in certain circumstances. PD is a new CD imaging imaging mode that might be superior to CD in some cases.

1 September 2000 in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
OKOliver Kripfgans
Oliver Kripfgans
JFJ.BRian Fowlkes
J.BRian Fowlkes
DMDouglas L. Miller
Douglas L. Miller
OEO.PEtter Eldevik
O.PEtter Eldevik
PCPaul L. Carson
Paul L. Carson

1 January 1990 in Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DADorit D. Adler
Dorit D. Adler
PCPaul L. Carson
Paul L. Carson
JRJonathan M. Rubin
Jonathan M. Rubin
DQDana Quinn-Reid
Dana Quinn-Reid

11 June 2014 in Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DRDavid L Raunig
David L Raunig
LMLisa M McShane
Lisa M McShane
GPGene Pennello
Gene Pennello
CGConstantine Gatsonis
Constantine Gatsonis
PCPaul L. Carson
Paul L. Carson
QGQIBA Technical Performance Working Group
QIBA Technical Performance Working Group
Technological developments and greater rigor in the quantitative measurement of biological features in medical images have given rise to an increased interest in using quantitative imaging biomarkers to measure changes in these features. Critical to the performance of a quantitative imaging biomarker in preclinical or clinical settings are three primary metrology areas of interest: measurement linearity and bias, repeatability, and the ability to consistently reproduce equivalent results when conditions change, as would be expected in any clinical trial. Unfortunately, performance studies to date differ greatly in designs, analysis method, and metrics used to assess a quantitative imaging biomarker for clinical use. It is therefore difficult or not possible to integrate results from different studies or to use reported results to design studies. The Radiological Society of North America and the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance with technical, radiological, and statistical experts developed a set of technical performance analysis methods, metrics, and study designs that provide terminology, metrics, and methods consistent with widely accepted metrological standards. This document provides a consistent framework for the conduct and evaluation of quantitative imaging biomarker performance studies so that results from multiple studies can be compared, contrasted, or combined.

1 October 1995 in Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJ M Rubin
J M Rubin
RAR S Adler
R S Adler
JFJ B Fowlkes
J B Fowlkes
SSS Spratt
S Spratt
JPJ E Pallister
J E Pallister
PCPaul L. Carson
Paul L. Carson
To estimate the fraction of moving blood in tissue with power Doppler ultrasound (US). Power Doppler US measurements of moving scatterers in a flow tube were made as a function of successive dilutions of the perfusate. Measurements were normalized relative to the maximum Doppler power in the center of the flow tube at the highest concentration and were used to calculate the fractional dilution of the perfusate for each run with each dilution used to represent increasing amounts of non-moving soft tissue in the sample volume. The technique was also applied to two clinical examples. Successive dilutions of the perfusate in the flow experiment showed a monotonic, linear decrease in the Doppler power as a function of dilution. The power Doppler US technique has the potential to more accurately estimate alterations in blood flow and has the advantage of being a continuous parameter that can be depth normalized.

26 May 2009 in IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MFM.L. Fabiilli
M.L. Fabiilli
Kevin Joseph HaworthKevin Joseph Haworth
Kevin Joseph Haworth
NFN.H. Fakhri
N.H. Fakhri
OKOliver Kripfgans
Oliver Kripfgans
PCPaul L. Carson
Paul L. Carson
JFJ.B. Fowlkes
J.B. Fowlkes
The vaporization of a superheated droplet emulsion into gas bubbles using ultrasound-termed acoustic droplet vaporization (ADV)-has potential therapeutic applications in embolotherapy and drug delivery. The optimization of ADV for therapeutic applications can be enhanced by understanding the physical mechanisms underlying ADV, which are currently not clearly elucidated. Acoustic cavitation is one possible mechanism. This paper investigates the relationship between ADV and inertial cavitation (IC) thresholds (measured as peak rarefactional pressures) by studying parameters that are known to influence the IC threshold. These parameters include bulk fluid properties such as gas saturation, temperature, viscosity, and surface tension; droplet parameters such as degree of superheat, surfactant type, and size; and acoustic properties such as pulse repetition frequency and pulse width. In all cases the ADV threshold occurred at a lower rarefactional pressure than the IC threshold, indicating that the phase transition occurs before IC events. The viscosity and temperature of the bulk fluid are shown to influence both thresholds directly and inversely, respectively. An inverse trend is observed between threshold and diameter for droplets in the 1 to 2.5 mum range. Based on a choice of experimental parameters, it is possible to achieve ADV with or without IC.