Anna Conte

Dr. Anna Conte

Department of Statistical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Roma, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 May 2011 in Journal of Econometrics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Anna ConteAnna Conte
Anna Conte
JHJohn D. Hey
John D. Hey
PMPeter G. Moffatt
Peter G. Moffatt

28 March 2013 in Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Anna ConteAnna Conte
Anna Conte
JHJohn Hey
John Hey

19 September 2016 in Economica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Anna ConteAnna Conte
Anna Conte
MLM. Vittoria Levati
M. Vittoria Levati
CNChiara Nardi
Chiara Nardi

12 July 2014 in Theory and Decision
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PBPhilomena M. Bacon
Philomena M. Bacon
Anna ConteAnna Conte
Anna Conte
Peter MoffattPeter Moffatt
Peter Moffatt
Spousal correlation in risk attitude is estimated using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel over the period 2004–2009. We apply the bivariate panel ordered probit model to the analysis of the simultaneous determination of the male’s and the female’s risk attitude, using the survey question about general willingness to take risk, provided on a 0–10 Likert-scale. The correlations between both the individual-specific effects of the two partners and the two within-individual errors are separately estimated, and found to be +0.285 and +0.310, respectively. We consider the former to be a key parameter, since its positive sign may be interpreted in terms of positive assortative mating on risk attitude: individuals tend to form partnerships with others having a similar risk attitude. We also find evidence that this correlation increases with years of marriage, suggesting either a form of spousal socialization or a selection process in which marriage breakdown is more likely in poorly matched couples.

1 June 2012 in Theory and Decision
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Anna ConteAnna Conte
Anna Conte
Peter MoffattPeter Moffatt
Peter Moffatt

1 May 2016 in Judgment and Decision Making
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Anna ConteAnna Conte
Anna Conte
MSMarco Scarsini
Marco Scarsini
OSOktay Sürücü
Oktay Sürücü
We experimentally explore the effects of time limitation on decision making. Under different time allowance conditions, subjects are presented with a queueing situation and asked to join one of the two given queues. The results can be grouped under two main categories. The first one concerns the factors driving decisions in a queueing system. Only some subjects behave consistently with rationality principles and use the relevant information efficiently. The rest of the subjects seem to adopt a simpler strategy that does not incorporate some information into their decision. The second category is related to the effects of time limitation on decision performance. A substantial proportion of the population is not affected by time limitations and shows consistent behavior throughout the treatments. On the other hand, some subjects’ performance is impaired by time limitations. More importantly, this impairment is not due to the stringency of the limitation but rather to being exposed to a time constraint.