Our aim was to evaluate the concordance between the Myriad MyChoice and two alternative homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) assays (AmoyDx HRD Focus NGS Panel and OncoScan™) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Tissue samples from 50 patients with newly diagnosed EOC and known Myriad MyChoice HRD status were included. DNA aliquots from tumor samples, previously evaluated with Myriad MyChoice and centrally reassessed, were distributed to laboratories to assess their HRD status using the two platforms, after being blinded for the Myriad MyChoice CDx HRD status. The primary endpoint was the concordance between Myriad MyChoice and each alternative assay. Tumor samples were evaluated with an AmoyDx^® HRD Focus Panel (n = 50) and with OncoScan™ (n = 43). Both platforms provided results for all tumors. Analysis showed that correlation was high for the Myriad MyChoice GI score and AmoyDx^® HRD Focus Panel (r = 0.79) or OncoScan™ (r = 0.87) (continuous variable). The overall percent agreement (OPA) between Myriad MyChoice GI status (categorical variable) and each alternative assay was 83.3% (68.6–93.3%) with AmoyDx and 77.5% (61.5–89.2%) with OncoScan™. The OPA in HRD status between Myriad MyChoice and AmoyDx was 88.6% (75.4–96.2). False-positive rates were 31.6% (6/19) for AmoyDx GI status and 31.9% (7/22) for OncoScan™, while false-negative rates were 0% (0/28, AmoyDx) and 11.1% (2/18, OncoScan™) compared with the Myriad MyChoice GI status. While substantial concordance between Myriad MyChoice and alternative assays was demonstrated, prospective validation of the analytical performance and clinical relevance of these assays is warranted.

Tumors harboring homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) are considered optimal candidates for poly(ADP‑ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP) inhibitor treatment. Such deficiency can be detected by analyzing breast cancer type (BRCA)1/2 gene mutations, as well as mutations in other genes of the homologous recombination pathway. The algorithmic measurement of the HRD effect by identifying genomic instability (GI) has been used as biomarker. As compared with the direct measurement of somatic gene alterations, this approach increases the number of patients who could benefit from PARP inhibitor treatment. In the present study, the performance of the Oncoscan CNV assay, accompanied by appropriate bioinformatic algorithms, was evaluated for its performance in GI calculation and was compared with that of a validated next‑generation sequencing (NGS) test (myChoice HRD test). In addition, the clinical utility of the GI score (GIS) and BRCA1/2 tumor analysis were investigated in a cohort of 444 patients with ovarian cancer. For that reason, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays and appropriate bioinformatics algorithms were used to calculate GIS in 29 patients with ovarian cancer with known GIS status using a validated NGS test. Furthermore, BRCA1/2 analysis results were compared between the aforementioned assay and the amplicon‑based Oncomine™ BRCA Research Assay. BRCA1/2 analysis was performed in 444 patients with ovarian cancer, while GIS was calculated in 175 BRCA1/2‑negative cases. The bioinformatics algorithm developed for GIS calculation in combination with NGS BRCA1/2 analysis (RediScore), and the OncoscanR pipeline exhibited a high overall agreement with the validated test (93.1%). In addition, the Oncomine NGS assay had a 100% agreement with the validated test. The BRCA1/2 mutation frequency was 26.5% in the examined patients with ovarian cancer. GIS was positive in 40% of the BRCA1/2‑negative cases. The RediScore bioinformatics algorithm developed for GIS calculation in combination with NGS BRCA1/2 analysis is a viable and effective approach for HRD calculation in patients with ovarian cancer, offering a positive prediction for PARP inhibitor responsiveness in 55% of the patients.

Several tumor types have been efficiently treated with PARP inhibitors (PARPis), which are now approved for the treatment of ovarian, breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancers. The BRCA1/2 genes and mutations in many additional genes involved in the HR pathway may be responsible for the HRD phenomenon. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between genomic loss of heterozygosity (gLOH) and alterations in 513 genes with targeted and immuno-oncology therapies in 406 samples using an NGS assay. In addition, the %gLOHs of 24 samples were calculated using the Affymetrix technology in order to compare the results obtained via the two methodologies. HR variations occurred in 20.93% of the malignancies, while BRCA1/2 gene alterations occurred in 5.17% of the malignancies. The %LOH was highly correlated with alterations in the BRCA1/2 genes, since 76.19% (16/21) of the BRCA1/2 positive tumors had a high %LOH value (p = 0.007). Moreover, the LOH status was highly correlated with the TP53 and KRAS statuses, but there was no association with the TMB value. Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient for the 24 samples simultaneously examined via both assays was 0.87, indicating a nearly perfect agreement. In conclusion, the addition of gLOH analysis could assist in the detection of additional patients eligible for treatment with PARPis.

In the era of precision oncology, comprehensive molecular profiling is critical for guiding targeted and immunotherapy strategies. This study presents the analytical and clinical validation of a 1021-gene next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel, designed for use with both formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue- and liquid-biopsy specimens. Analytical validation confirmed the assay’s high sensitivity and specificity across variant types—including SNVs (Single Nucleotide Variations), indels, CNVs (Copy Number Variations), and fusions—down to a 0.5% variant allele frequency. The assay also accurately identified microsatellite instability (MSI) and tumor mutational burden (TMB), essential biomarkers for immunotherapy. Clinical validation was performed on over 1300 solid tumor samples from diverse histologies, revealing actionable alterations in over 50% of cases. The panel detected on-label treatment biomarkers in 12.57% of patients, increasing to 20.15% when immunotherapy markers were included. Additionally, the assay demonstrated strong concordance with orthogonal methods and was effective in detecting variants in plasma-derived circulating tumor DNA in 70% of evaluable cases. These findings support the robust performance and broad clinical applicability of the 1021-gene panel for comprehensive genomic profiling in both tissue and liquid biopsies, offering a valuable tool for personalized cancer treatment.

Several tumor types have been efficiently treated with PARPis, which are now approved for the treatment of ovarian, breast, prostate, and pancreatic cancer. The BRCA1/2 genes and mutations in many additional genes involved in the HR pathway may be responsible for the HRD phenomenon. In the present study, an NGS assay was used to analyze 513 genes associated with targeted and immuno-oncology therapies in 406 samples. In addition, the %gLOH values of 24 samples were also calculated using the Affymetrix technology to compare the results obtained by the two methodologies. HR variations occurred in 20.93% of the malignancies, while BRCA1/2 gene alterations in 5.17%. %LOH was highly correlated with alterations in the BRCA1/2 genes since 76.19% (16/21) of the BRCA1/2 positive tumors had a high %LOH value (p=0.007). Moreover, the LOH status was highly correlated with the TP53 and KRAS statuses, but there was no association with the TMB value. Lin's Concordance Correlation Coefficient for the 24 evaluable samples simultaneously examined by both assays was 0.87, indicating a nearly perfect agreement. In conclusion, the addition of gLOH analysis could assist the detection of additional patients eligible for PARPis