João Paulo Silva

Dr. João Paulo Silva

Centro de Investigação em Biodiversidade e Recursos Genéticos, Universidade do Porto, Fornelo e Vairao, Portugal

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
26 January 2018 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MTMarlee A. Tucker
Marlee A. Tucker
KBKatrin Böhning-Gaese
Katrin Böhning-Gaese
WFWilliam F. Fagan
William F. Fagan
JFJohn M. Fryxell
John M. Fryxell
BMBram Van Moorter
Bram Van Moorter
TMThomas Mueller
Thomas Mueller
Restrictions on roaming: Until the past century or so, the movement of wild animals was relatively unrestricted, and their travels contributed substantially to ecological processes. As humans have increasingly altered natural habitats, natural animal movements have been restricted. Tucker et al. examined GPS locations for more than 50 species. In general, animal movements were shorter in areas with high human impact, likely owing to changed behaviors and physical limitations. Besides affecting the species themselves, such changes could have wider effects by limiting the movement of nutrients and altering ecological interactions. Science , this issue p. 466

15 March 2016 in Movement Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NGNathalie I. Gilbert
Nathalie I. Gilbert
RCRicardo Correia
Ricardo Correia
JSJoão Paulo Silva
João Paulo Silva
CPCarlos Pacheco
Carlos Pacheco
ICInês Catry
Inês Catry
AFAldina M. A. Franco
Aldina M. A. Franco
The migratory patterns of animals are changing in response to global environmental change with many species forming resident populations in areas where they were once migratory. The white stork (Ciconia ciconia) was wholly migratory in Europe but recently guaranteed, year-round food from landfill sites has facilitated the establishment of resident populations in Iberia. In this study 17 resident white storks were fitted with GPS/GSM data loggers (including accelerometer) and tracked for 9.1 ± 3.7 months to quantify the extent and consistency of landfill attendance by individuals during the non-breeding and breeding seasons and to assess the influence of landfill use on daily distances travelled, percentage of GPS fixes spent foraging and non-landfill foraging ranges. Resident white storks used landfill more during non-breeding (20.1 % ± 2.3 of foraging GPS fixes) than during breeding (14.9 % ± 2.2). Landfill attendance declined with increasing distance between nest and landfill in both seasons. During non-breeding a large percentage of GPS fixes occurred on the nest throughout the day (27 % ± 3.0 of fixes) in the majority of tagged storks. This study provides first confirmation of year-round nest use by resident white storks. The percentage of GPS fixes on the nest was not influenced by the distance between nest and the landfill site. Storks travelled up to 48.2 km to visit landfills during non-breeding and a maximum of 28.1 km during breeding, notably further than previous estimates. Storks nesting close to landfill sites used landfill more and had smaller foraging ranges in non-landfill habitat indicating higher reliance on landfill. The majority of non-landfill foraging occurred around the nest and long distance trips were made specifically to visit landfill. The continuous availability of food resources on landfill has facilitated year-round nest use in white storks and is influencing their home ranges and movement behaviour. White storks rely on landfill sites for foraging especially during the non-breeding season when other food resources are scarcer and this artificial food supplementation probably facilitated the establishment of resident populations. The closure of landfills, as required by EU Landfill Directives, will likely cause dramatic impacts on white stork populations.

14 February 2019 in Journal of Animal Ecology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMAna Teresa Marques
Ana Teresa Marques
CSCarlos David Santos
Carlos David Santos
FHFrank Hanssen
Frank Hanssen
AMAntonio-Román Muñoz
Antonio-Román Muñoz
AOAlejandro Onrubia Onrubia
Alejandro Onrubia Onrubia
JSJoão Paulo Silva
João Paulo Silva

9 June 2023 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTMarlee A. Tucker
Marlee A. Tucker
ASAafke Schipper
Aafke Schipper
TATempe S. F. Adams
Tempe S. F. Adams
NANina Attias
Nina Attias
TATal Avgar
Tal Avgar
TMThomas Mueller
Thomas Mueller
COVID-19 lockdowns in early 2020 reduced human mobility, providing an opportunity to disentangle its effects on animals from those of landscape modifications. Using GPS data, we compared movements and road avoidance of 2300 terrestrial mammals (43 species) during the lockdowns to the same period in 2019. Individual responses were variable with no change in average movements or road avoidance behavior, likely due to variable lockdown conditions. However, under strict lockdowns 10-day 95th percentile displacements increased by 73%, suggesting increased landscape permeability. Animals’ 1-hour 95th percentile displacements declined by 12% and animals were 36% closer to roads in areas of high human footprint, indicating reduced avoidance during lockdowns. Overall, lockdowns rapidly altered some spatial behaviors, highlighting variable but substantial impacts of human mobility on wildlife worldwide.

11 January 2019 in Global Ecology and Biogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MTMarlee A. Tucker
Marlee A. Tucker
OAOlga Alexandrou
Olga Alexandrou
RBRichard O. Bierregaard
Richard O. Bierregaard
KBKeith L. Bildstein
Keith L. Bildstein
KBKatrin Böhning‐Gaese
Katrin Böhning‐Gaese
TMThomas Mueller
Thomas Mueller

1 June 2004 in Biological Conservation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJoão Paulo Silva
João Paulo Silva
MPMárcia Pinto
Márcia Pinto
JPJorge M Palmeirim
Jorge M Palmeirim