It is important to accurately assess agricultural drought because of its harmful impacts on the ecosystem and economy. Soil moisture reanalysis datasets provide an important way to assess agricultural drought. In this study, the ERA5-Land surface and subsurface soil moisture was used to estimate the soil water deficit index (SWDI) in four southern provinces of China. The ERA5-Land dataset was evaluated with in situ soil moisture observations from agrometeorological stations. Agricultural drought was assessed for three climate zones at a weekly scale from 2017 to 2019 and was compared with the atmospheric water deficit (AWD). It was found that both ERA5-Land soil moisture and the derived SWDI have relatively high accuracy, and the wet bias in the ERA5-Land dataset can be reduced by the calculation of the SWDI. The subsurface layer has better performance than the surface layer in drought monitoring, though they are highly correlated. Different climate zones demonstrate different drought periods and drought severity, and the temperate climate zone with no dry season has less droughts. The most severe droughts with the largest spatial extent occurred in the early winter, especially in 2019. Differences in the SWDI and AWD are mainly shown in southwestern Yunnan. The results of this study have important reference values for drought risk management.

Global carbon fluxes describe the carbon exchange between land and atmosphere. However, already available global carbon fluxes datasets have not been adjusted by the available site data and deep learning tools. In this work, a global carbon fluxes dataset (named as GCFD) of gross primary productivity (GPP), terrestrial ecosystem respiration (RECO), and net ecosystem exchange (NEE) has been developed via a deep learning based convolutional neural network (CNN) model. The dataset has a spatial resolution of 1 km at three time steps per month from January 1999 to June 2020. Flux measurements were used as a training target while remote sensing of vegetation conditions and meteorological data were used as predictors. The results showed that CNN could outperform other commonly used machine learning methods such as random forest (RF) and artificial neural network (ANN) by leading to satisfactory performance with R² values of the validation stage as 0.82, 0.72 and 0.62 for GPP, RECO, and NEE modelling, respectively. Thus, CNN trained using reanalysis meteorological data and remote sensing data was chosen to produce the global dataset. GCFD showed higher accuracy and more spatial details than some other global carbon flux datasets with reasonable spatial pattern and temporal variation. GCFD is also in accordance with vegetation conditions detected by remote sensing. Owing to the obtained results, GCFD can be a useful reference for various meteorological and ecological analyses and modelling, especially when high resolution carbon flux maps are required.

Land carbon fluxes play a critical role in ecosystems, and acquiring a comprehensive global database of carbon fluxes is essential for understanding the Earth’s carbon cycle. The primary methods of obtaining the spatial distribution of land carbon fluxes include utilizing machine learning models based on in situ measurements, estimating through satellite remote sensing, and simulating ecosystem models. Recently, an innovative machine learning product known as the Global Carbon Flux Dataset (GCFD) has been released. In this study, we assessed the reliability of the GCFD by comparing it with existing data products, including two machine learning products (FLUXCOM and NIES (National Institute for Environmental Studies)), two ecosystem model products (TRENDY and EC-LUE (eddy covariance–light use efficiency model)), and one remote sensing product (Global Land Surface Satellite), on both site and global scales. Our findings indicate that, in terms of average absolute difference, the spatial distribution of the GCFD is most similar to the NIES product, albeit with slightly larger discrepancies compared to the other two types of products. When using site observations as the benchmark, gross primary production (GPP), respiration of ecosystem (RECO), and net ecosystem exchange of machine learning products exhibit higher R² (ranging from 0.57 to 0.85, 0.53–0.79, and 0.31–0.70, respectively) compared to model products and remote sensing products. Furthermore, we analyzed the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of carbon fluxes in various regions. The results demonstrate an upward trend in both GPP and RECO over the past two decades, while NEE exhibits an opposite trend. This trend is particularly pronounced in tropical regions, where higher GPP is observed in tropical, subtropical, and oceanic climate zones. Additionally, two remote sensing variables that influence changes in carbon fluxes, i.e., fraction absorbed photosynthetically active radiation and leaf area index, exhibit relatively consistent spatial and temporal characteristics. Overall, our study can provide valuable insights into different types of carbon flux products and contribute to understanding the general features of global carbon fluxes.