Christopher Staley

Dr. Christopher Staley

Surgery, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2014 in FEMS Microbiology Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
VHValerie J Harwood
Valerie J Harwood
Christopher StaleyChristopher Staley
Christopher Staley
BBBrian D. Badgley
Brian D. Badgley
KBKim Borges
Kim Borges
AKAsja Korajkic
Asja Korajkic
This review of microbial source tracking (MST) methods for determining the dominant sources of fecal pollution in environmental waters focuses on qPCR-based ass

23 August 2016 in Annals of Internal Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CKColleen R. Kelly
Colleen R. Kelly
AKAlexander Khoruts
Alexander Khoruts
Christopher StaleyChristopher Staley
Christopher Staley
MSMichael Jay Sadowsky
Michael Jay Sadowsky
MAMortadha Abd
Mortadha Abd
LBLawrence J. Brandt
Lawrence J. Brandt
Evidence for the efficacy and safety of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is limited. In this randomized trial conducted at 2 academic medica... Background: To date, evidence for the efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been limited to case series and open-label clinical t...

25 November 2016 in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Christopher StaleyChristopher Staley
Christopher Staley
AWAlexa R. Weingarden
Alexa R. Weingarden
AKAlexander Khoruts
Alexander Khoruts
MSMichael Jay Sadowsky
Michael Jay Sadowsky

1 February 2018 in Cell Host & Microbe
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSChristopher S. Smillie
Christopher S. Smillie
JSJenny Sauk
Jenny Sauk
DGDirk Gevers
Dirk Gevers
JFJonathan Friedman
Jonathan Friedman
JSJaeyun Sung
Jaeyun Sung
EAEric J. Alm
Eric J. Alm

12 August 2016 in Microbiome
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JEJessica J. Eichmiller
Jessica J. Eichmiller
MHMatthew Hamilton
Matthew Hamilton
Christopher StaleyChristopher Staley
Christopher Staley
MSMichael Jay Sadowsky
Michael Jay Sadowsky
PSPeter Sorensen
Peter Sorensen
Although the common, silver, and bighead carps are native and sparsely distributed in Eurasia, these fish have become abundant and invasive in North America. An understanding of the biology of these species may provide insights into sustainable control methods. The animal-associated microbiome plays an important role in host health. Characterization of the carp microbiome and the factors that affect its composition is an important step toward understanding the biology and interrelationships between these species and their environments. We compared the fecal microbiomes of common, silver, and bighead carps from wild and laboratory environments using Illumina sequencing of bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA). The fecal bacterial communities of fish were diverse, with Shannon indices ranging from 2.3 to 4.5. The phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Fusobacteria dominated carp guts, comprising 76.7 % of total reads. Environment played a large role in shaping fecal microbial community composition, and microbiomes among captive fishes were more similar than among wild fishes. Although differences among wild fishes could be attributed to feeding preferences, diet did not strongly affect microbial community structure in laboratory-housed fishes. Comparison of wild- and lab-invasive carps revealed five shared OTUs that comprised approximately 40 % of the core fecal microbiome. The environment is a dominant factor shaping the fecal bacterial communities of invasive carps. Captivity alters the microbiome community structure relative to wild fish, while species differences are pronounced within habitats. Despite the absence of a true stomach, invasive carp species exhibited a core microbiota that warrants future study.

8 August 2013 in Journal of Applied Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Christopher StaleyChristopher Staley
Christopher Staley
TUT. Unno
T. Unno
TGT.J. Gould
T.J. Gould
BJB. Jarvis
B. Jarvis
JPJ. Phillips
J. Phillips
MSMichael Jay Sadowsky
Michael Jay Sadowsky
Aims A next‐generation, Illumina‐based sequencing approach was used to characterize the bacterial community at ten sites along the Upper Mississippi River to evaluate shifts in the community potentially resulting from upstream inputs and land use changes. Furthermore, methodological parameters including filter size, sample volume and sample reproducibility were evaluated to determine the best sampling practices for community characterization. Methods and Results Community structure and diversity in the river was determined using Illumina next‐generation sequencing technology and the V6 hypervariable region of 16S rDNA. A total of 16 400 operational taxonomic units (OTUs) were observed (4594 ± 824 OTUs per sample). Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria and Verrucomicrobia accounted for 93·6 ± 1·3% of all sequence reads, and 90·5 ± 2·5% belonged to OTUs shared among all sites (n = 552). Among nonshared sequence reads at each site, 33–49% were associated with potentially anthropogenic impacts upstream of the second sampling site. Alpha diversity decreased with distance from the pristine headwaters, while rainfall and pH were positively correlated with diversity. Replication and smaller filter pore sizes minimally influenced the characterization of community structure. Conclusions Shifts in community structure are related to changes in the relative abundance, rather than presence/absence of OTUs, suggesting a ‘core bacterial community’ is present throughout the Upper Mississippi River. Significance and Impact of the Study This study is among the first to characterize a large riverine bacterial community using a next‐generation‐sequencing approach and demonstrates that upstream influences and potentially anthropogenic impacts can influence the presence and relative abundance of OTUs downstream resulting in significant variation in community structure.