Peter Sorensen

Dr. Peter Sorensen

Department of Fisheries, Wildlife and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, 55018, St. Paul, MN, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

43Years (1984-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
28 January 2016 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JEJessica J. Eichmiller
Jessica J. Eichmiller
SBSendréa E. Best
Sendréa E. Best
PSPeter Sorensen
Peter Sorensen

10 November 2014 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JEJessica J Eichmiller
Jessica J Eichmiller
PBPrzemyslaw G Bajer
Przemyslaw G Bajer
PSPeter Sorensen
Peter Sorensen
Although environmental DNA (eDNA) has been used to infer the presence of rare aquatic species, many facets of this technique remain unresolved. In particular, the relationship between eDNA and fish distribution is not known. We examined the relationship between the distribution of fish and their eDNA (detection rate and concentration) in a lake. A quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay for a region within the cytochrome b gene of the common carp (Cyprinus carpio or ‘carp’), an ubiquitous invasive fish, was developed and used to measure eDNA in Lake Staring (MN, USA), in which both the density of carp and their distribution have been closely monitored for several years. Surface water, sub-surface water, and sediment were sampled from 22 locations in the lake, including areas frequently used by carp. In water, areas of high carp use had a higher rate of detection and concentration of eDNA, but there was no effect of fish use on sediment eDNA. The detection rate and concentration of eDNA in surface and sub-surface water were not significantly different (p≥0.5), indicating that eDNA did not accumulate in surface water. The detection rate followed the trend: high-use water > low-use water > sediment. The concentration of eDNA in sediment samples that were above the limit of detection were several orders of magnitude greater than water on a per mass basis, but a poor limit of detection led to low detection rates. The patchy distribution of eDNA in the water of our study lake suggests that the mechanisms that remove eDNA from the water column, such as decay and sedimentation, are rapid. Taken together, these results indicate that effective eDNA sampling methods should be informed by fish distribution, as eDNA concentration was shown to vary dramatically between samples taken less than 100 m apart.

1 December 1988 in Biology of Reproduction
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PSPeter Sorensen
Peter Sorensen
THToshiaki J. Hara
Toshiaki J. Hara
NSNorman E. Stacey
Norman E. Stacey
FGFrederick Wm. Goetz
Frederick Wm. Goetz
This study establishes that ovulated female goldfish release F type prostaglandins (PGFs) to the water where they stimulate male spawning behavior and

18 May 2015 in Molecular Ecology Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JEJessica J. Eichmiller
Jessica J. Eichmiller
LMLoren M. Miller
Loren M. Miller
PSPeter Sorensen
Peter Sorensen

12 August 2016 in Microbiome
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JEJessica J. Eichmiller
Jessica J. Eichmiller
MHMatthew Hamilton
Matthew Hamilton
Christopher StaleyChristopher Staley
Christopher Staley
MSMichael Jay Sadowsky
Michael Jay Sadowsky
PSPeter Sorensen
Peter Sorensen
Although the common, silver, and bighead carps are native and sparsely distributed in Eurasia, these fish have become abundant and invasive in North America. An understanding of the biology of these species may provide insights into sustainable control methods. The animal-associated microbiome plays an important role in host health. Characterization of the carp microbiome and the factors that affect its composition is an important step toward understanding the biology and interrelationships between these species and their environments. We compared the fecal microbiomes of common, silver, and bighead carps from wild and laboratory environments using Illumina sequencing of bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA). The fecal bacterial communities of fish were diverse, with Shannon indices ranging from 2.3 to 4.5. The phyla Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Fusobacteria dominated carp guts, comprising 76.7 % of total reads. Environment played a large role in shaping fecal microbial community composition, and microbiomes among captive fishes were more similar than among wild fishes. Although differences among wild fishes could be attributed to feeding preferences, diet did not strongly affect microbial community structure in laboratory-housed fishes. Comparison of wild- and lab-invasive carps revealed five shared OTUs that comprised approximately 40 % of the core fecal microbiome. The environment is a dominant factor shaping the fecal bacterial communities of invasive carps. Captivity alters the microbiome community structure relative to wild fish, while species differences are pronounced within habitats. Despite the absence of a true stomach, invasive carp species exhibited a core microbiota that warrants future study.

1 January 1987 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JDJ. G. Dulka
J. G. Dulka
NSN. E. Stacey
N. E. Stacey
PSPeter Sorensen
Peter Sorensen
GKG. J. Van Der Kraak
G. J. Van Der Kraak