Aims: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used to treat chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) can cause cardiovascular adverse events. So far, the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) charts of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) have been used to identify cancer patients at increased cardiovascular risk. The primary aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of the new cardiovascular risk assessment model proposed by the Cardio-Oncology Study Group of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC in collaboration with the International Cardio-Oncology Society (ICOS) to stratify the cardiovascular risk in CML patients, compared with SCORE risk charts. The secondary aim was to establish the incidence of adverse arterial events (AEs) in patients with CML treated with TKIs and the influence of preventive treatment with aspirin. Methods and results: A retrospective single-centre observational study was carried out on 58 patients (32 men and 26 women; mean age ± SD: 59 ± 15 years) with CML treated with TKIs for a median period of 43 ± 31 months. Cardiological evaluation was performed and cardiovascular risk was estimated with SCORE risk charts and with the new risk assessment tool proposed by HFA/ICOS. AEs were recorded. According to SCORE charts and the new HFA/ICOS risk stratification tool, respectively, 46% (Group A1) and 60% (Group A2) of patients were at high–very high risk, and 54% (Group B1) and 40% (Group B2) at low–moderate risk. AEs were significantly more frequent in Group A1 than Group B1 (P value < 0.01) when considered overall; they were significantly more frequent in Group A2 than Group B2 either overall or considered individually. HFA/ICOS risk stratification tool was significantly more sensitive than SCORE (P < 0.01) in identifying patients at higher risk of cardiovascular toxicity. In addition, we did not find AEs in patients pretreated with aspirin. Conclusions: The new HFA/ICOS risk stratification model allows a more tailored cardiovascular risk stratification in patients with CML and it is more sensitive than SCORE charts.

In acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the urgency of coronary revascularization through percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is paramount, offering notable advantages over pharmacologic treatment. However, the persistent risk of adverse events, including recurrent AMI and heart failure post-revascularization, underscores the necessity for enhanced strategies in managing coronary artery disease. Traditional angiography, while widely employed, presents significant limitations by providing only two-dimensional representations of complex three-dimensional vascular structures, hampering the accurate assessment of plaque characteristics and stenosis severity. Intravascular imaging, specifically optical coherence tomography (OCT), significantly addresses these limitations with superior spatial resolution compared to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Within the context of AMI, OCT serves dual purposes: as a diagnostic tool to accurately identify culprit lesions in ambiguous cases and as a guide for optimizing PCI procedures. Its capacity to differentiate between various mechanisms of acute coronary syndrome, such as plaque rupture and spontaneous coronary dissection, enhances its diagnostic potential. Furthermore, OCT facilitates precise lesion preparation, optimal stent sizing, and confirms stent deployment efficacy. Recent meta-analyses indicate that OCT-guided PCI markedly improves safety and efficacy in revascularization, subsequently decreasing the risks of mortality and complications. This review emphasizes the critical role of OCT in refining patient-specific therapeutic approaches, aligning with the principles of precision medicine to enhance clinical outcomes for individuals experiencing AMI.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), consisting of the combination of aspirin and an inhibitor of the platelet P2Y₁₂ receptor for ADP, remains among the most investigated treatments in cardiovascular medicine. While a substantial amount of research initially stemmed from the observations of late and very late stent thrombosis events in the first-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) era, DAPT has been recently transitioning from a purely stent-related to a more systemic secondary prevention strategy. Oral and parenteral platelet P2Y₁₂ inhibitors are currently available for clinical use. The latter have been shown to be extremely suitable in drug-naïve patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), mainly because oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors are associated with delayed efficacy in patients with STEMI and because pre-treatment with P2Y₁₂ inhibitors is discouraged in NSTE-ACS, and in patients with recent DES implantation and in need of urgent cardiac and non-cardiac surgery. More definitive evidence is needed, however, about optimal switching strategies between parenteral and oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors and about newer potent subcutaneous agents that are being developed for the pre-hospital setting.

Arterial thrombosis emerges from the interplay between plaque disruption, platelet activation, and coagulation pathway amplification on a background of heterogeneous ischemic and bleeding risk. Optimal antithrombotic therapy therefore varies across clinical settings, from acute coronary syndromes (ACS) to chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), ischemic stroke, peripheral artery disease (PAD), and atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with atherosclerotic disease. Contemporary European and North American guidelines endorse an increasingly individualized approach, moving away from rigid “one-size-fits-all” dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration and intensity and incorporating dual pathway inhibition with low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin in selected high-risk CCS and PAD patients. In ischemic stroke, short-course DAPT is confined to minor events and transient ischemic attacks, whereas long-term monotherapy remains standard, and the coexistence of AF typically shifts the balance toward oral anticoagulation. Across all scenarios, antithrombotic benefit must be weighed against bleeding, especially in elderly, frail, or comorbid patients. Evidence gaps remain substantial, particularly in patients with overlapping vascular territories, AF plus atherosclerotic disease, and after ischemic stroke of complex or mixed mechanisms. This narrative review summarizes current evidence and guideline-based strategies in major atherosclerotic settings, proposes a unifying conceptual framework, and highlights key uncertainties and research directions for truly personalized antithrombotic care.