Electrophysiological aspects of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) are still poorly explored compared to other aspects of the disease. However, electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities play an important role in CA diagnosis and prognosis and the management of arrhythmias is a crucial part of CA treatment. Low voltages and a pseudonecrosis pattern with poor R-wave progression in precordial leads are especially common findings. These are useful for CA diagnosis and risk stratification, especially when combined with clinical or echocardiographic findings. Both ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias are common in CA, especially in transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR), and their prevalence is related to disease progression. Sustained and non-sustained ventricular tachycardias’ prognostic role is still debated, and, to date, there is a lack of specific indications for implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD). On the other hand, atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common supraventricular arrhythmia with a prevalence of up to 88% of ATTR patients. Anticoagulation should be considered irrespective of CHADsVA score. Furthermore, even if AF seems to not be an independent prognostic factor in CA, its treatment for symptom control is still crucial. Finally, conduction disturbances and bradyarrhythmias are also common, requiring pacemaker implantation in up to 40% of patients.

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS), encompassing conditions like ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS), represent a significant challenge in cardiovascular care due to their complex pathophysiology and substantial impact on morbidity and mortality. The 2023 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for ACS management introduce several updates in key areas such as invasive treatment timing in NSTE-ACS, pre-treatment strategies, approaches to multivessel disease, and the use of imaging modalities including computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and intracoronary imaging techniques, such as optical coherence tomography (OCT) and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). They also address a modulation of antiplatelet therapy, taking into consideration different patient risk profiles, and introduce new recommendations for low-dose colchicine. These guidelines provide important evidence-based updates in practice, reflecting an evolution in the understanding and management of ACS, yet some potentially missed opportunities for more personalized care and technology adoption are discussed.

Aims: To describe through emblematic images rare but clinically relevant carotid artery stenting complications that occurred at two high-volume centres for carotid artery stenting (CAS). Background: CAS is an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in patients judged to be at high risk for CEA. CAS complications range between 1 and 9% and are higher in older patients complaining of neurological symptoms at the time of presentation. Besides periprocedural or early-after-procedure stroke, which remains the true Achilles’ heel of CAS, other dramatic complications might compromise the clinical outcomes of this procedure. Methods: Five infrequent complications, out of more than 1000 CAS performed in the years 2016–2021, have been described. Results: Among CAS complications, acute carotid stent thrombosis, rescue retrieval of a disconnected distal cerebral embolic protection device, plaque prolapse after carotid stenting, cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome (CHS), and radial artery long sheath entrapment requiring surgical intervention were found to account for 0.3% of the total number of procedures performed by operators with high CAS volume. Conclusions: Unusual CAS complications may infrequently occur, even in hands of expert operators. To know how to deal with such complications might help interventionalists to improve CAS performance.

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have long posed a formidable challenge to cardiovascular care, despite significant advancements in both understanding and treatment over the last few decades

Arterial thrombosis emerges from the interplay between plaque disruption, platelet activation, and coagulation pathway amplification on a background of heterogeneous ischemic and bleeding risk. Optimal antithrombotic therapy therefore varies across clinical settings, from acute coronary syndromes (ACS) to chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), ischemic stroke, peripheral artery disease (PAD), and atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with atherosclerotic disease. Contemporary European and North American guidelines endorse an increasingly individualized approach, moving away from rigid “one-size-fits-all” dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration and intensity and incorporating dual pathway inhibition with low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin in selected high-risk CCS and PAD patients. In ischemic stroke, short-course DAPT is confined to minor events and transient ischemic attacks, whereas long-term monotherapy remains standard, and the coexistence of AF typically shifts the balance toward oral anticoagulation. Across all scenarios, antithrombotic benefit must be weighed against bleeding, especially in elderly, frail, or comorbid patients. Evidence gaps remain substantial, particularly in patients with overlapping vascular territories, AF plus atherosclerotic disease, and after ischemic stroke of complex or mixed mechanisms. This narrative review summarizes current evidence and guideline-based strategies in major atherosclerotic settings, proposes a unifying conceptual framework, and highlights key uncertainties and research directions for truly personalized antithrombotic care.