Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged as an increasingly valuable option for the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DCBs enables the localized delivery of antiproliferative drugs directly to the target coronary lesion, avoiding the need for permanent scaffold implantation. Historically, paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCBs) have been the most used device in this context. Paclitaxel interferes with intracellular microtubule function, leading to cell cycle arrest. However, its cytotoxicity at a higher dosage and narrow therapeutic range has raised some safety concerns. To address these issues, sirolimus-coated balloons (SCBs) have been introduced as an alternative. Sirolimus acts as a cytostatic agent with potent anti-inflammatory and antiproliferative properties and is characterized by a wider therapeutic range, potentially offering a safer profile. Several experimental and clinical studies comparing the safety and efficacy of PCBs versus SCBs have yielded mixed results. Recently, a novel DCB (SirPlux Duo), which simultaneously releases both paclitaxel and sirolimus, has been tested in a porcine coronary model with promising results. In this review, we will elucidate the mechanisms of action of paclitaxel and sirolimus, examine contemporary preclinical and clinical evidence comparing PCB and SCB angioplasty, and discuss novel devices that may enhance the safety and efficacy of PCI with DCBs.

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Several cardiovascular risk factors are implicated in atherosclerotic plaque promotion and progression and are responsible for the clinical manifestations of coronary artery disease (CAD), ranging from chronic to acute coronary syndromes and sudden coronary death. The advent of intravascular imaging (IVI), including intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography and near-infrared diffuse reflectance spectroscopy has significantly improved the comprehension of CAD pathophysiology and has strengthened the prognostic relevance of coronary plaque morphology assessment. Indeed, several atherosclerotic plaque phenotype and mechanisms of plaque destabilization have been recognized with different natural history and prognosis. Finally, IVI demonstrated benefits of secondary prevention therapies, such as lipid-lowering and anti-inflammatory agents. The purpose of this review is to shed light on the principles and properties of available IVI modalities along with their prognostic significance.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the main cause of morbidity and death worldwide, and atherosclerosis represents the leading pathophysiological pathway responsible for CAD. Atherosclerotic process is a complex interplay of mechanisms and mediators resulting in plaque formation, progression and destabilization, the latter being the most frequent cause of acute cardiovascular events. Considering the systemic nature of atherosclerosis, polyvascular disease involvement is possible and has been described since 1960s. Accordingly, epidemiologic studies reported that concomitant CAD and atherosclerosis in other arterial beds like carotid arteries, lower limb arteries, mesenteric and renal circulation, and aorta, is frequent and related to increased chance of future cardiovascular events. Although risk factors, atherosclerotic plaque features and mechanisms of plaque destabilization are largely shared across different sites, many studies have reported some disparities among districts. Moreover, simultaneous polyvascular disease has been associated with increased likelihood of having particular plaque characteristics depending on the affected arterial level. In this comprehensive narrative review, we aim to discuss about epidemiology of concomitant CAD and atherosclerosis in other arterial beds, and to examine differences in risk factors, plaque features and mechanisms of plaque instability between CAD and other atherosclerotic locations. Finally, we review the studies observing differences on plaque features according to involved atherosclerotic sites, focusing on CAD.

Coronary vasomotor disorders (CVD) are characterized by transient hypercontraction of coronary vascular smooth muscle cells, leading to hypercontraction of epicardial and/or microvascular coronary circulation. CVDs play a relevant role in the pathogenesis of ischemia, angina and myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Invasive provocative testing with intracoronary Acetylcholine (ACh) administration is the gold standard tool for addressing CVD, providing relevant therapeutic and prognostic implications. However, safety concerns preclude the widespread incorporation of the ACh test into clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to shed light on the pathophysiology underlying CVD and on the clinical role of the ACh test, focusing on safety profile and prognostic implications. We will also discuss contemporary evidence on the management of CVD and the role of the ACh test in driving a personalized approach of patients with CVD.

This review aims to delineate the potential impact of static meditation practice on cholesterol and triglyceride levels. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were systematically screened up until December 2023 to identify pertinent studies. After searching the scientific literature, 16 clinical studies (11 trials and 5 observational experiments) met the criteria for inclusion, involving a total of 1147 participants. In general, Ayurvedic-based meditation techniques were predominantly associated with lower total cholesterol levels, mindfulness-based techniques demonstrated benefits in both total cholesterol and triglyceride levels, and Eastern meditation techniques with spiritual origins were primarily linked to improved serum concentrations of HDL cholesterol. Study participants mostly engaged in meditation on a daily basis, often practicing it once or even twice a day, spanning a duration ranging from a few weeks to several months. The meta-analysis shows an association between meditation practice in healthy or sub-healthy adults and reduced cholesterol levels, with an average decrease of approximately −14 mg/dL (MD = −13.91 [−23.35; −4.47] mg/dL; p = 0.02), alongside favorable and even more pronounced impacts on triglyceride levels (MD = −32.56 [−48.44; −16.68] mg/dL; p < 0.01). In summary, regular engagement in static meditation practices can be associated with lower triglyceride and, to a lesser extent, cholesterol levels. Further studies on the topic are recommended to better investigate the relationship between meditation practice and physiological parameters.

Despite evidence-based therapies, patients presenting with atherosclerosis involving more than one vascular bed, such as those with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD), constitute a particularly vulnerable group characterized by enhanced residual long-term risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), as well as major adverse limb events (MALE). The latter are progressively emerging as a difficult outcome to target, being correlated with increased mortality. Antithrombotic therapy is the mainstay of secondary prevention in both patients with PAD or CAD; however, the optimal intensity of such therapy is still a topic of debate, particularly in the post-acute and long-term setting. Recent well-powered randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have provided data in favor of a more intense antithrombotic therapy, such as prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor or a therapy with aspirin combined with an anticoagulant drug. Both approaches increase bleeding and selection of patients is a key issue. The aim of this review is, therefore, to discuss and summarize the most up-to-date available evidence for different strategies of anti-thrombotic therapies in patients with chronic PAD and CAD, particularly focusing on studies enrolling patients with both types of atherosclerotic disease and comparing a higher- versus a lower-intensity antithrombotic strategy. The final objective is to identify the optimal tailored approach in this setting, to achieve the greatest cardiovascular benefit and improve precision medicine.