Cardiac amyloidosis, encompassing both transthyretin (ATTR) and light-chain (AL) types, poses considerable challenges in patient management due to its intricate pathophysiology and progressive course. This narrative review elucidates the pivotal role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in the assessment of these patients. CPET is essential for evaluating disease progression by measuring cardio-respiratory performance and providing prognostic insights. This functional test is crucial not only for tracking the disease trajectory, but also for assessing the effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies. Moreover, CPET facilitates the customization of therapeutic strategies based on individual patient performance, enhancing personalized care. By objectively measuring parameters such as peak oxygen uptake (VO₂ peak), ventilatory efficiency, and exercise capacity, clinicians can gain a deeper understanding of the degree of functional impairment and make informed decisions regarding treatment initiation, adjustment, and anticipated outcomes. This review emphasizes the importance of CPET in advancing personalized medicine approaches, ultimately striving to improve the quality of life and clinical outcomes for patients with cardiac amyloidosis.

Despite evidence-based therapies, patients presenting with atherosclerosis involving more than one vascular bed, such as those with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD), constitute a particularly vulnerable group characterized by enhanced residual long-term risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), as well as major adverse limb events (MALE). The latter are progressively emerging as a difficult outcome to target, being correlated with increased mortality. Antithrombotic therapy is the mainstay of secondary prevention in both patients with PAD or CAD; however, the optimal intensity of such therapy is still a topic of debate, particularly in the post-acute and long-term setting. Recent well-powered randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have provided data in favor of a more intense antithrombotic therapy, such as prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor or a therapy with aspirin combined with an anticoagulant drug. Both approaches increase bleeding and selection of patients is a key issue. The aim of this review is, therefore, to discuss and summarize the most up-to-date available evidence for different strategies of anti-thrombotic therapies in patients with chronic PAD and CAD, particularly focusing on studies enrolling patients with both types of atherosclerotic disease and comparing a higher- versus a lower-intensity antithrombotic strategy. The final objective is to identify the optimal tailored approach in this setting, to achieve the greatest cardiovascular benefit and improve precision medicine.

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is an increasingly recognized cause of restrictive cardiomyopathy in which extracellular amyloid deposition leads to progressive structural and functional impairment. Beyond myocardial infiltration, growing evidence highlights the central role of autonomic nervous system dysfunction (ANS) —particularly the vagal nerve involvement—as a contributor to orthostatic intolerance, syncope, exercise limitation, arrhythmias, and reduced quality of life. Emerging data suggest that autonomic impairment may precede overt cardiac manifestations, offering a potential window for earlier recognition. This narrative review summarizes current knowledge on the mechanisms and clinical relevance of autonomic dysfunction in CA, emphasizing the novelty of the “vagal link” as a unifying framework connecting with a specific focus on the vagus nerve (VN) and its complex interplay with cardiac structure and function. We further discuss diagnostic approaches and the potential role of autonomic assessment in early detection, risk stratification, and personalized treatment strategies. A clearer understanding of vagal dysfunction may provide new insights into disease progression and identify opportunities for therapeutic innovation.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy is an autosomal dominant disease. The main feature of this disorder is its occurrence in patients who present a left ventricular hypertrophy, unexplained by the loading conditions, usually asymmetric with greatest involvement most commonly of the interventricular septum.Case presentation During a sports medicine control, a ultrasound scan in a 17 years old patient has shown a concentric left ventricular parietal hypertrophy associated with a 23 mm mid- basal interventricular septum thickness. After genetic counselling, a positive family history for hypertrophic cardiac disease and parents' consanguineity was found. The genetic basis of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was investigated through a dedicated gene panel. The genetic test has revealed the presence of the variant c.3424G>A (p.Glu1142Lys) in the MYH7 gene in a homozygous state. Genotyping of the parents and of the two brothers revealed the presence of the MYH7 variant in heterozygosity in both parents and in the younger brother. In all of them, variable signs of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were found. Our findings report the presence of a homozygous variant in a sarcomeric gene (MYH7) which gave rise to early HCM, whereas the variant in a heterozygous state was associated to much milder cardiac phenotypes in the affected relatives. The onset and the progression of the hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the reported family is to be referred to the presence of the variant in hetero- or homo-zygosity in a gene dosage manner.

Despite evidence-based therapies, patients presenting with atherosclerosis involving more than one vascular bed, such as those with peripheral artery disease (PAD) and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD), constitute a particular vulnerable group characterized by enhanced residual long-term risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), as well as major adverse limb events (MALE). The latter are progressively emerging as a hard outcome to be targeted, being correlated with increased mortality. Antithrombotic therapy is the mainstay of secondary prevention in both patients with PAD or CAD however, the optimal intensity of such therapy is still topic of debate, particularly in the post-acute and long-term setting. Recent well powered randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have provided data in favor of a more intense antithrombotic therapy, such as prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor or a therapy with aspirin combined with an anticoagulant drug. Both approaches increase bleeding and patients selection is a key issue. The aim of this review is therefore to discuss and summarize the most updated available evidences for different strategies of anti-thrombotic therapies in patients with chronic PAD and CAD, particularly focusing on studies enrolling patients with both type of atherosclerotic disease and comparing a higher versus a lower intensity antithrombotic strategy. The final objective is to identify the optimal tailored approach in this setting, to achieve the greatest cardiovascular benefit and improving precision medicine.

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM; MIM #107970) is a primitive heart muscle disease characterized by progressive myocardial loss and fibrosis or fibrofatty replacement, predisposing patients to ventricular arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death, and heart failure. Despite advances in imaging and genetics, early diagnosis remains challenging due to incomplete penetrance, variable phenotypic expressivity, and the fact that fatal arrhythmic events may often occur in the early stages of the disease. In this context, the identification of reliable biomarkers could enhance diagnostic accuracy, support risk stratification, and guide clinical management. This narrative review examines the current landscape of potential and emerging biomarkers in ACM, including troponins, natriuretic peptides, inflammatory proteins, microRNAs, fibrosis-related markers, and other molecules. Several of these biomarkers have demonstrated associations with disease severity, arrhythmic burden, or structural progression, although their routine clinical utility remains limited. The increasing relevance of genetic testing and non-invasive tissue characterization—particularly through cardiac imaging techniques—should also be emphasized as part of a multimodal diagnostic strategy in which biomarkers may play a complementary role. Although no single biomarker currently meets the criteria for a standalone diagnostic application, ongoing research into multi-marker panels and novel molecular targets offers promising perspectives. In conclusion, the integration of circulating biomarkers with imaging findings, genetic data, and clinical parameters may open new avenues for improving early detection and supporting personalized therapeutic strategies in patients with suspected ACM.