While handcrafted radiomic features (HRFs) have shown promise in the field of personalized medicine, many hurdles hinder its incorporation into clinical practice, including but not limited to their sensitivity to differences in acquisition and reconstruction parameters. In this study, we evaluated the effects of differences in in-plane spatial resolution (IPR) on HRFs, using a phantom dataset (n = 14) acquired on two scanner models. Furthermore, we assessed the effects of interpolation methods (IMs), the choice of a new unified in-plane resolution (NUIR), and ComBat harmonization on the reproducibility of HRFs. The reproducibility of HRFs was significantly affected by variations in IPR, with pairwise concordant HRFs, as measured by the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), ranging from 42% to 95%. The number of concordant HRFs (CCC > 0.9) after resampling varied depending on (i) the scanner model, (ii) the IM, and (iii) the NUIR. The number of concordant HRFs after ComBat harmonization depended on the variations between the batches harmonized. The majority of IMs resulted in a higher number of concordant HRFs compared to ComBat harmonization, and the combination of IMs and ComBat harmonization did not yield a significant benefit. Our developed framework can be used to assess the reproducibility and harmonizability of RFs.

Virtual clinical trials (VCTs) of medical imaging require realistic models of human anatomy. For VCTs in breast imaging, a multi-scale Perlin noise method is proposed to simulate anatomical structures of breast tissue in the context of an ongoing breast phantom development effort. Four Perlin noise distributions were used to replace voxels representing the tissue compartments and Cooper’s ligaments in the breast phantoms. Digital mammography and tomosynthesis projections were simulated using a clinical DBT system configuration. Power-spectrum analyses and higher-order statistics properties using Laplacian fractional entropy (LFE) of the parenchymal texture are presented. These objective measures were calculated in phantom and patient images using a sample of 140 clinical mammograms and 500 phantom images. Power-law exponents were calculated using the slope of the curve fitted in the low frequency [0.1, 1.0] mm ⁻¹ region of the power spectrum. The results show that the images simulated with our prior and proposed Perlin method have similar power-law spectra when compared with clinical mammograms. The power-law exponents calculated are −3.10, −3.55, and −3.46, for the log-power spectra of patient, prior phantom and proposed phantom images, respectively. The results also indicate an improved agreement between the mean LFE estimates of Perlin-noise based phantoms and patients than our prior phantoms and patients. Thus, the proposed method improved the simulation of anatomic noise substantially compared to our prior method, showing close agreement with breast parenchyma measures.

The reproducibility of handcrafted radiomic features (HRFs) has been reported to be affected by variations in imaging parameters, which significantly affect the generalizability of developed signatures and translation to clinical practice. However, the collective effect of the variations in imaging parameters on the reproducibility of HRFs remains unclear, with no objective measure to assess it in the absence of reproducibility analysis. We assessed these effects of variations in a large number of scenarios and developed the first quantitative score to assess the reproducibility of CT-based HRFs without the need for phantom or reproducibility studies. We further assessed the potential of image resampling and ComBat harmonization for removing these effects. Our findings suggest a need for radiomics-specific harmonization methods. Our developed score should be considered as a first attempt to introduce comprehensive metrics to quantify the reproducibility of CT-based handcrafted radiomic features. More research is warranted to demonstrate its validity in clinical contexts and to further improve it, possibly by the incorporation of more realistic situations, which better reflect real patients’ situations.