Masayori Ishikawa

Prof. Masayori Ishikawa


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

28Years (1999-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2009 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBGerben R. Borst
Gerben R. Borst
MIMasayori Ishikawa
Masayori Ishikawa
Jasper NijkampJasper Nijkamp
Jasper Nijkamp
MHMichael Hauptmann
Michael Hauptmann
HSHiroki Shirato
Hiroki Shirato
JSJan-Jakob Sonke
Jan-Jakob Sonke


1 June 2000 in Journal of Alloys and Compounds
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRyosuke, O. Suzuki
Ryosuke, O. Suzuki
MIMasayori Ishikawa
Masayori Ishikawa
KOKatsutoshi Ono
Katsutoshi Ono

5 March 2013 in Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CTChie Toramatsu
Chie Toramatsu
NKNorio Katoh
Norio Katoh
SSShinichi Shimizu
Shinichi Shimizu
HNHideaki Nihongi
Hideaki Nihongi
TMTaeko Matsuura
Taeko Matsuura
HSHiroki Shirato
Hiroki Shirato
Background: We performed a dosimetric comparison of spot-scanning proton therapy (SSPT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to investigate the impact of tumor size on the risk of radiation induced liver disease (RILD). Methods: A number of alternative plans were generated for 10 patients with HCC. The gross tumor volumes (GTV) varied from 20.1 to 2194.5 cm3. Assuming all GTVs were spherical, the nominal diameter was calculated and ranged from 3.4 to 16.1 cm. The prescription dose was 60 Gy for IMRT or 60 cobalt Gy-equivalents for SSPT with 95% planning target volume (PTV) coverage. Using IMRT and SSPT techniques, extensive comparative planning was conducted. All plans were evaluated by the risk of RILD estimated using the Lyman-normal-tissue complication probability model. Results: For IMRT the risk of RILD increased drastically between 6.3–7.8 cm nominal diameter of GTV. When the nominal diameter of GTV was more than 6.3 cm, the average risk of RILD was 94.5% for IMRT and 6.2% for SSPT. Conclusions: Regarding the risk of RILD, HCC can be more safely treated with SSPT, especially if its nominal diameter is more than 6.3 cm.

1 April 2002 in Journal of Alloys and Compounds
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRyosuke, O. Suzuki
Ryosuke, O. Suzuki
MIMasayori Ishikawa
Masayori Ishikawa
KOKatsutoshi Ono
Katsutoshi Ono

1 June 2008 in Radiotherapy and Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
NKNorio Katoh
Norio Katoh
RORikiya Onimaru
Rikiya Onimaru
YSYusuke Sakuhara
Yusuke Sakuhara
DADaisuke Abo
Daisuke Abo
SSShinichi Shimizu
Shinichi Shimizu
HSHiroki Shirato
Hiroki Shirato