Shinichi Shimizu

Shinichi Shimizu


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2002 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YSYvette Seppenwoolde
Yvette Seppenwoolde
HSHiroki Shirato
Hiroki Shirato
KKKei Kitamura
Kei Kitamura
SSShinichi Shimizu
Shinichi Shimizu
MHMarcel van Herk
Marcel van Herk
KMKazuo Miyasaka
Kazuo Miyasaka

1 November 2000 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HSHiroki Shirato
Hiroki Shirato
SSShinichi Shimizu
Shinichi Shimizu
TKTatsuya Kunieda
Tatsuya Kunieda
KKKei Kitamura
Kei Kitamura
MHMarcel van Herk
Marcel van Herk
KMKazuo Miyasaka
Kazuo Miyasaka

1 September 2000 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HSHiroki Shirato
Hiroki Shirato
SSShinichi Shimizu
Shinichi Shimizu
KKKei Kitamura
Kei Kitamura
TNTakeshi Nishioka
Takeshi Nishioka
KKKenji Kagei
Kenji Kagei
KMKazuo Miyasaka
Kazuo Miyasaka

1 January 2004 in Seminars in Radiation Oncology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HSHiroki Shirato
Hiroki Shirato
YSYvette Seppenwoolde
Yvette Seppenwoolde
KKKei Kitamura
Kei Kitamura
RORikiya Onimura
Rikiya Onimura
SSShinichi Shimizu
Shinichi Shimizu

16 January 2004 in Physics in Medicine & Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
GSGregory C Sharp
Gregory C Sharp
SJSteve B Jiang
Steve B Jiang
SSShinichi Shimizu
Shinichi Shimizu
HSHiroki Shirato
Hiroki Shirato
Image guidance in radiotherapy and extracranial radiosurgery offers the potential for precise radiation dose delivery to a moving tumour. Recent work has demonstrated how to locate and track the position of a tumour in real-time using diagnostic x-ray imaging to find implanted radio-opaque markers. However, the delivery of a treatment plan through gating or beam tracking requires adequate consideration of treatment system latencies, including image acquisition, image processing, communication delays, control system processing, inductance within the motor, mechanical damping, etc. Furthermore, the imaging dose given over long radiosurgery procedures or multiple radiotherapy fractions may not be insignificant, which means that we must reduce the sampling rate of the imaging system. This study evaluates various predictive models for reducing tumour localization errors when a real-time tumour-tracking system targets a moving tumour at a slow imaging rate and with large system latencies. We consider 14 lung tumour cases where the peak-to-peak motion is greater than 8 mm, and compare the localization error using linear prediction, neural network prediction and Kalman filtering, against a system which uses no prediction. To evaluate prediction accuracy for use in beam tracking, we compute the root mean squared error between predicted and actual 3D motion. We found that by using prediction, root mean squared error is improved for all latencies and all imaging rates evaluated. To evaluate prediction accuracy for use in gated treatment, we present a new metric that compares a gating control signal based on predicted motion against the best possible gating control signal. We found that using prediction improves gated treatment accuracy for systems that have latencies of 200 ms or greater, and for systems that have imaging rates of 10 Hz or slower.

1 May 2003 in International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RORikiya Onimaru
Rikiya Onimaru
HSHiroki Shirato
Hiroki Shirato
SSShinichi Shimizu
Shinichi Shimizu
KKKei Kitamura
Kei Kitamura
BXB.O Xu
B.O Xu
HDHirotoshi Dosaka-Akita
Hirotoshi Dosaka-Akita