Although smartwatches are not considered medical devices, experimental validation of their accuracy in detecting hypoxemia is necessary due to their potential use in monitoring conditions manifested by a prolonged decrease in peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SpO₂), such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, sleep apnea syndrome, and COVID-19, or at high altitudes, e.g., during sport climbing, where the use of finger-sensor-based pulse oximeters may be limited. The aim of this study was to experimentally compare the accuracy of SpO₂ measurement of popular smartwatches with a clinically used pulse oximeter according to the requirements of ISO 80601-2-61. Each of the 18 young and healthy participants underwent the experimental assessment three times in randomized order—wearing Apple Watch 8, Samsung Galaxy Watch 5, or Withings ScanWatch—resulting in 54 individual experimental assessments and complete datasets. The accuracy of the SpO₂ measurements was compared to that of the Radical-7 (Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA) during short-term hypoxemia induced by consecutive inhalation of three prepared gas mixtures with reduced oxygen concentrations (14%, 12%, and 10%). All three smartwatch models met the maximum acceptable root-mean-square deviation (≤4%) from the reference measurement at both normal oxygen levels and induced desaturation with SpO₂ less than 90%. Apple Watch 8 reached the highest reliability due to its lowest mean bias and root-mean-square deviation, highest Pearson correlation coefficient, and accuracy in detecting hypoxemia. Our findings support the use of smartwatches to reliably detect hypoxemia in situations where the use of standard finger pulse oximeters may be limited.

Background: Regular monitoring of blood pressure (BP) provides early detection of hypertension. Automated cuff-based oscillometric devices are commonly used for simplicity and reduced observer subjectivity. However, these devices can be uncomfortable, prompting the development of non-invasive, cuffless BP monitoring in smartwatches. Current validation standards, including ISO 81060-2:2018 and IEEE 1708TM-2019, specify accuracy criteria, yet most studies focus on short-term performance and do not address their long-term stability across the calibration period. Objective: This prospective single-arm study aimed to assess the long-term accuracy and stability of BP measurements obtained from a smartwatch throughout its recommended calibration interval. Methods: Thirty-seven participants completed a 28-day protocol, consisting of an initial calibration on day 0 followed by 27 consecutive days of paired measurements of systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP). BP was simultaneously measured using a Samsung Galaxy Watch 5 and a validated reference sphygmomanometer Omron M4. Accuracy was assessed against ISO and IEEE standards, and the recalibration test consistent with European Society of Hypertension (ESH) guidelines was performed using the last three measurements before scheduled recalibration. Results: The smartwatch met the accuracy criteria based on ISO and IEEE standards in all but one measure, with mean absolute differences, mean differences (MD), and standard deviations for SBP and DBP within acceptable limits. Bland-Altman analysis revealed negligible MD for SBP (–0.34 mmHg) and DBP (0.62 mmHg), with minimal drift over the calibration period (–0.19 mmHg for SBP and 1.02 mmHg for DBP). However, when reference BP was 10 mmHg away from the calibration point, MD was 3.4 mmHg for SBP and 5.1 mmHg for DBP. Conclusions: The smartwatch demonstrated acceptable long-term stability and accuracy for BP monitoring and trend tracking. However, accuracy declined as values diverged from the calibration point. Cuff-based confirmation is advised when BP fluctuates substantially or when diagnostic or therapeutic decisions are planned. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06098092

The COVID-19 pandemic raised global concerns about the shortage of ventilators and revealed the challenges of rapidly scaling up production to meet emergency needs. In response, numerous teams worldwide attempted to develop emergency and simple mechanical ventilators. Among these, the CoroVent ventilator was developed to meet the urgent need for ventilatory support in the Czech Republic. The aim of this study was to describe the innovative and simple design of the CoroVent emergency ventilator, evaluate its compliance with international safety and performance standards, verify its reliability under simulated clinical conditions, and demonstrate its suitability for use in crisis scenarios. CoroVent was designed with a focus on the clinical needs of patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure and to ensure safe ventilation while maintaining a simplified design. It features volume-controlled, pressure-limited mandatory ventilation and supports key adjustable parameters such as tidal volume, respiratory rate, inspiratory-to-expiratory time ratio, inspired oxygen fraction, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The ventilator incorporates robust safety mechanisms, including alarms and a safety relief valve, to protect against excessive airway pressures. Results confirmed the ability to maintain consistent tidal volumes, stable PEEP, and precise pressure limitation over extended periods of use. The results showed that CoroVent met the essential international standards for accuracy, including those set by the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and ISO 80601-2-12. Although production of these ventilators was stopped in 2021 as the Czech Republic managed the crisis and shortage of ventilators, the results validate their reliability as emergency ventilators and indicate their potential to support critical care needs in crisis situations.

Background: Pulse oximetry is a non-invasive method for continuous monitoring of peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SpO₂) to estimate arterial oxygen saturation. Previous studies suggested that SpO₂ measurements show variability depending on the particular finger that is used for measurement. To date, no study has compared all fingers for SpO₂ under hypoxemia and during continuous simultaneous monitoring with randomization of finger sensor placement. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the inter-finger variability of SpO₂ values during sequential desaturation and step resaturation. Methods: Forty-three out of forty-five healthy participants (age 23.0 ± 1.8 years, BMI 24.0 ± 4.4 kg·m^–2) completed the experimental assessment with short-term induced hypoxemia by consecutive inhalation of three prepared gas mixtures with reduced oxygen concentrations (14%, 12%, and 10%). SpO₂ was measured continuously with the Masimo Radical-97 (Masimo Corp., Irvine, CA, USA) pulse oximeters. Results: The SpO₂ measured on the thumb was lower than all other fingers by 0.6% to 0.7% SpO₂, a systematic difference that is less than the clinically accepted accuracy of oximeters. No difference in SpO₂ dynamics was found between any of the fingers during step resaturation. Conclusions: A systematic difference in measured SpO₂ exists between the thumb and the other fingers during desaturation, which should be considered at least as well as the impact of the performance of a particular oximeter, sensor placement or anatomical variability.

On average, one hundred people die each year under avalanche snow. Despite extensive global research on gas exchange in buried avalanche victims, it remains unclear how the diffusion of respiratory gases affects survival under avalanche snow. This study aims to determine how oxygen and carbon dioxide diffuse through snow, as well as through wet and dry perlite, which may serve as a surrogate for avalanche snow. A custom-made apparatus to study the diffusion of respiratory gases consisted of a plastic cylinder (1200 mm long, ID 300 mm) with 13 gas sampling needles evenly spaced along the axis of the cylinder filled with the tested material. Following 60 min of free diffusion, gas samples were analyzed using a vital signs monitor with a module for respiratory gas analysis (E-CAiOVX, Datex-Ohmeda, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). A combination of 16% oxygen, 5% carbon dioxide, and 79% nitrogen was used. The rates of diffusion for both respiratory gases were comparable in snow and both forms of perlite. Oxygen propagated faster than carbon dioxide. Due to similar diffusion characteristics to snow, perlite possesses the potential to stand in as an effective substitute for soft snow for the study of respiratory dynamics, for conducting breathing experiments, and for testing avalanche safety equipment.

Understanding the mechanics of the respiratory system is crucial for optimizing ventilator settings and ensuring patient safety. While simple models of the respiratory system typically consider only flow resistance and lung compliance, lung tissue resistance is usually neglected. This study investigated the effect of lung tissue viscoelasticity on delivered mechanical power in a physical model of the respiratory system and the possibility of distinguishing tissue resistance from airway resistance using proximal pressure measured at the airway opening. Three different configurations of a passive physical model of the respiratory system representing different mechanical properties (Tissue resistance model, Airway resistance model, and No-resistance model) were tested. The same volume-controlled ventilation and parameters were set for each configuration, with only the inspiratory flow rates being adjusted. Pressure and flow were measured with a Datex-Ohmeda S/5 vital signs monitor (Datex-Ohmeda, Madison, WI, USA). Tissue resistance was intentionally tuned so that peak pressures and delivered mechanical energy measured at airway opening were similar in Tissue and Airway Resistance models. However, measurements inside the artificial lung revealed significant differences, with Tissue resistance model yielding up to 20% higher values for delivered mechanical energy. The results indicate the need to revise current methods of calculating mechanical power delivery, which do not distinguish between tissue resistance and airway flow resistance, making it difficult to evaluate and interpret the significance of mechanical power delivery in terms of lung ventilation protectivity.