Background and purpose: The screening tool for diagnosing lower extremity arterial disease is the assessment of the ankle-brachial index (ABI), which is widely used in general practice. However, resting ABI can easily produce a false negative result. In light of this, our goal was to determine the proportion of definitive diagnoses (peripheral arterial disease [PAD] confirmed or refuted) among patients screened in general practice, and the rate of cases in which the need for further specialized examination is necessary, with special attention to groups having non-compressible arteries and ABI negative symptomatic status. The aim of our work is to improve the efficiency of primary health care screening in PAD and reduce the extremely high domestic amputation ratio. Patients and methods: Eight hundred and sixteen patients were screened. We used the Edinburgh Questionnaire and recorded medical histories, major risk factors, current complaints, and medication. Physical examinations were performed, including ABI testing. Results: Thirty-three percent complained about lower extremity claudication; 23% had abnormal ABI values; 13% of the patients within the normal ABI range had complaints of dysbasia; and 12% were in the non-compressible artery group. The ABI-negative symptomatic group’s risk factor profile showed a close similarity to the clear PAD-positive and non-compressible artery groups. Conclusion: The percentage of PAD could be higher than the number of patients diagnosed by ABI screening. Nearly a quarter of the population fell into the non-compressible artery and ABI-negative symptomatic groups, together defined as the “murky zone”. When screening purposely for PAD, these patients deserve special attention due to the insufficient selectivity and sensitivity of measurements. If there is high clinical suspicion of PAD in spite of normal ABI values, further assessment may be considered.

Purpose: To illustrate dynamic, time-resolved CTA (d-CTA) imaging technique in characterizing aortic endoleak type/inflow using quantitative parameters and its value in providing image guidance for targeted treatment approach. Technique: Dedicated endoleak protocol involved acquiring multiple time-resolved contrast enhanced scans using third-generation CT scanner (Somatom Force ^® , Siemens Healthineers). Parameters such as scan field of view (FOV), kV, number/timing of scans were customized based on patient’s body-mass-index, timing bolus, and prior imaging findings. D-CTA image datasets were evaluated qualitatively and quantitatively using time-attenuation curves (TAC) analysis after motion correction using a dedicated software ( syngo .via ^® , Siemens). D-CTA findings from 4 illustrative cases demonstrating type I, type II (inferior mesenteric and lumbar artery inflow), and type III endoleak were illustrated. TAC analysis with time to peak parameter enabled better characterization of endoleak type and inflow. During endoleak intervention, target vessels from d-CTA images were electronically annotated and overlaid on fluoroscopy using 2D−3D image fusion to provide image guidance for targeted treatment. Conclusion: D-CTA imaging with TAC analysis characterizes aortic endoleak type and inflow, in addition to providing image guidance for targeted endoleak treatment. Such dynamic, time-resolved imaging techniques may provide further insights into understanding aortic endoleak that remains an Achilles heel for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this proof-of-concept study was to demonstrate the setup and feasibility of transcarotid access for remote robotic neurointerventions in a cadaveric model. METHODS: The interventional procedures were performed in a fresh-frozen cadaveric model using an endovascular robotic system and a robotic angiography imaging system. A prototype remote, robotic-drive system with an ethernet-based network connectivity and audio-video communication system was used to drive the robotic system remotely. After surgical exposure of the common carotid artery in a cadaveric model, an 8-Fr arterial was inserted and anchored. A telescopic guiding sheath and catheter/microcatheter combination was modified to account for the “workable” length with the CorPath GRX robotic system using transcarotid access. RESULTS: To simulate a carotid stenting procedure, a 0.014-inch wire was advanced robotically to the extracranial internal carotid artery. After confirming the wire position and anatomy by angiography, a self-expandable rapid exchange nitinol stent was loaded into the robotic cassette, advanced, and then deployed robotically across the carotid bifurcation. To simulate an endovascular stroke recanalization procedure, a 0.014-inch wire was advanced into the proximal middle cerebral artery with robotic assistance. A modified 2.95-Fr delivery microcatheter (Velocity, Penumbra Inc.) was loaded into the robotic cassette and positioned. After robotic retraction of the wire, it was switched manually to a mechanical thrombectomy device (Solitaire X, Medtronic). The stentriever was then advanced robotically into the end of the microcatheter. After robotic unfolding and short microcatheter retraction, the microcatheter was manually removed and the stent retriever was extracted using robotic assistance. During intravascular navigation, the device position was guided by 2D angiography and confirmed by 3D cone-beam CT angiography. CONCLUSIONS: In this proof-of-concept cadaver study, the authors demonstrated the setup and technical feasibility of transcarotid access for remote robot-assisted neurointerventions such as carotid artery stenting and mechanical thrombectomy. Using transcarotid access, catheter length modifications were necessary to achieve “working length” compatibility with the current-generation CorPath GRX robotic system. While further improvements in dedicated robotic solutions for neurointerventions and next-generation thrombectomy devices are necessary, the transcarotid approach provides a direct, relatively rapid access route to the brain for delivering remote stroke treatment.

Emergent complex abdominal aortic diseases are challenging to treat. During in situ laser fenestration (ISLF), aortic branches are covered and flow is restored with in situ fenestration of the stent graft, with promising midterm results. This study aimed to expand on the limited body of knowledge of midterm outcomes of ISLF in renovisceral aortic pathology in a multicentre setting. Retrospective pooled data on consecutive ISLF cases of visceral aortic stent grafts undertaken from 2018 - 2023 in three aortic centres were analysed. Technical success was defined as successful vascularisation with a bridging stent graft and acceptable final angiographic series without signs of endoleak related to the bridging stent graft. Target vessel instability was defined as an endoleak related to the bridging stent graft, disconnection, kink, stenosis, occlusion of bridging stent, re-intervention on bridging stent graft, or rupture or death related to the bridging stent graft. A total of 65 ISLFs were performed in 34 patients, with a mean age 74 years. The procedure was acute in 79%, and 35% were ruptures. Pre-stenting was performed on 56 target vessels (86%). Four patients (12%) died within 30 days; all presented with a rupture. Technical success was achieved in 61 of 65 (94%) ISLFs. All failed cannulations were in the renal arteries: three due to difficult angulations and one dissected during cannulation. Median follow up was 16 (interquartile range 5, 22) months. Cumulative survival at six months, one year, and two years was 88%, 80%, and 72%, respectively. In total, six (10%) target vessel instabilities were detected: two (3%) type III endoleaks, and four (7%) stent stenosis; all required re-lining. Freedom from target vessel instability at six months until the end of follow up was 89%. On the latest follow up scan, all successfully deployed ISLF bridging stents were patent (primary assisted patency 100%, 61 of 61) without signs of endoleak type 3. In situ laser fenestration is a promising tool for emergent endovascular procedures in complex anatomies.

The past decade has seen significant advances in dynamic imaging of the aorta. Today’s vascular surgeons have the opportunity to choose from a wide array of imaging modalities to evaluate different aortic pathologies. While vascular ultrasound and aortography are considered to be the bread and butter imaging modalities, newer dynamic imaging techniques provide time-resolved information in various aortic pathologies. However, despite growing evidence of their advantages in the literature, they have not been routinely adopted. In order to understand the role of these emerging modalities, one must understand their principles, advantages, and limitations in the context of various clinical scenarios. In this review, we provide an overview of dynamic imaging techniques for aortic pathologies and describe various dynamic computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging protocols, clinical applications, and potential future directions.