Alessia Cavazza

Dr. Alessia Cavazza


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2020 in Cell Stem Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KMKazutaka Murata
Kazutaka Murata
UJUnmesh Jadhav
Unmesh Jadhav
SMShariq Madha
Shariq Madha
JEJohan van Es
Johan van Es
JDJustin Dean
Justin Dean
RSRamesh A. Shivdasani
Ramesh A. Shivdasani

12 August 2020 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RRRajeev Rai
Rajeev Rai
MRMarianna Romito
Marianna Romito
ERElizabeth Rivers
Elizabeth Rivers
GTGiandomenico Turchiano
Giandomenico Turchiano
GBGeorges Blattner
Georges Blattner
ACAlessia Cavazza
Alessia Cavazza
Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome (WAS) is an X-linked primary immunodeficiency with severe platelet abnormalities and complex immunodeficiency. Although clinical gene therapy approaches using lentiviral vectors have produced encouraging results, full immune and platelet reconstitution is not always achieved. Here we show that a CRISPR/Cas9-based genome editing strategy allows the precise correction of WAS mutations in up to 60% of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), without impairing cell viability and differentiation potential. Delivery of the editing reagents to WAS HSPCs led to full rescue of WASp expression and correction of functional defects in myeloid and lymphoid cells. Primary and secondary transplantation of corrected WAS HSPCs into immunodeficient mice showed persistence of edited cells for up to 26 weeks and efficient targeting of long-term repopulating stem cells. Finally, no major genotoxicity was associated with the gene editing process, paving the way for an alternative, yet highly efficient and safe therapy.

18 January 2013 in Human Gene Therapy
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ACAlessia Cavazza
Alessia Cavazza
AMArianna Moiani
Arianna Moiani
FMFulvio Mavilio
Fulvio Mavilio
Gene transfer vectors derived from oncoretroviruses or lentiviruses are the most robust and reliable tools to stably integrate therapeutic transgenes in human cells for clinical applications. Integration of these vectors in the genome may, however, have undesired effects caused by insertional deregulation of gene expression at the transcriptional or post-transcriptional level. The occurrence of severe adverse events in several clinical trials involving the transplantation of stem cells genetically corrected with retroviral vectors showed that insertional mutagenesis is not just a theoretical event, and that retroviral transgenesis is associated with a finite risk of genotoxicity. In addressing these issues, the gene therapy community offered a spectacular example of how scientific knowledge and technology can be put to work to understand the causes of unpredicted side effects, design new vectors, and develop tools and models to predict their safety and efficacy. As an added benefit, these efforts brought new basic knowledge on virus–host interactions and on the biology and dynamics of human somatic stem cells. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the interactions between retroviruses and the human genome and addresses the impact of target site selection on the safety of retroviral vector–mediated gene therapy.

1 May 2019 in Molecular Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
UJUnmesh Jadhav
Unmesh Jadhav
ACAlessia Cavazza
Alessia Cavazza
KBKushal K. Banerjee
Kushal K. Banerjee
HXHuafeng Xie
Huafeng Xie
NONicholas K. O’nEill
Nicholas K. O’nEill
RSRamesh A. Shivdasani
Ramesh A. Shivdasani

1 August 2016 in Cell Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TKTae-Hee Kim
Tae-Hee Kim
ASAssieh Saadatpour
Assieh Saadatpour
GGGuoji Guo
Guoji Guo
MSMadhurima Saxena
Madhurima Saxena
ACAlessia Cavazza
Alessia Cavazza
RSRamesh A. Shivdasani
Ramesh A. Shivdasani
Lgr5(+) intestinal stem cells (ISCs) drive epithelial self-renewal, and their immediate progeny-intestinal bipotential progenitors-produce absorptive and secretory lineages via lateral inhibition. To define features of early transit from the ISC compartment, we used a microfluidics approach to measure selected stem- and lineage-specific transcripts in single Lgr5(+) cells. We identified two distinct cell populations, one that expresses known ISC markers and a second, abundant population that simultaneously expresses markers of stem and mature absorptive and secretory cells. Single-molecule mRNA in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence verified expression of lineage-restricted genes in a subset of Lgr5(+) cells in vivo. Transcriptional network analysis revealed that one group of Lgr5(+) cells arises from the other and displays characteristics expected of bipotential progenitors, including activation of Notch ligand and cell-cycle-inhibitor genes. These findings define the earliest steps in ISC differentiation and reveal multilineage gene priming as a fundamental property of the process.

18 January 2025 in Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
ACAlessia Cavazza
Alessia Cavazza
FMFrancisco J. Molina-Estévez
Francisco J. Molina-Estévez
ÁRÁlvaro Plaza Reyes
Álvaro Plaza Reyes
VRVictor Ronco
Victor Ronco
ANAsma Naseem
Asma Naseem
karim benabdellahkarim benabdellah
karim benabdellah
In the past decade, precise targeting through genome editing has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional therapeutic approaches. Genome editing can be performed using various platforms, where programmable DNA nucleases create permanent genetic changes at specific genomic locations due to their ability to recognize precise DNA sequences. Clinical application of this technology requires the delivery of the editing reagents to transplantable cells ex vivo or to tissues and organs for in vivo approaches, often representing a barrier to achieving the desired editing efficiency and safety. In this review, authored by members of the GenE-HumDi European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action, we described the plethora of delivery systems available for genome-editing components, including viral and non-viral systems, highlighting their advantages, limitations, and potential application in a clinical setting.