Strenuous exercise can be associated with “Exercise Induced Gastrointestinal Syndrome” (Ex-GIS), a clinical condition characterized by a series of gastrointestinal (GI) disturbances that may impact the physical and psychological performance of athletes. The pathophysiology comprises multi-factorial interactions between the GI tract and the circulatory, immune, enteric, and central nervous systems. There is considerable evidence for increases in the indices of intestinal damage, permeability, and endotoxemia associated with impaired gastric emptying, slowing of small intestinal transit, and malabsorption of nutrients. Heat stress and racing mode seem to exacerbate these GI disturbances. GI symptomatology that derives from strenuous exercise is similar to that of IBS and other GI functional disorders defined in the Rome IV Criteria. To manage Ex-GIS, the exercise modality, state of dehydration, environmental temperature, concomitant therapies, and self-managed diet should be evaluated, and if risk elements are present, an attempt should be made to modify them. Multiple strategies can be successively adopted to manage Ex-GIS. Nutritional and behavioral interventions appear to be the principal ones to avoid symptoms during the exercise. The aim of this review will be to explore the pathophysiology, clinical aspect, and current literature on behavioral and nutritional strategies to manage Ex-GIS, regarding a gluten-free diet and low-fermentable oligo-, di-, and mono-saccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet.

Background: The gut–brain axis (GBA) is a bidirectional communication network connecting the central nervous system with the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, influencing both mental and physical health. Recent research has underscored the significant role of diet in modulating this axis, with attention to how specific dietary patterns can impact anxiety and depression, particularly when linked to disorders of gut–brain interaction (DGBIs), like intestinal bowel syndrome (IBS). Aims and Methods: This narrative review examines the effects of specific diet regimens on the GBA and its potential role in managing psychopathology, focusing on anxiety and depression, IBS, and the low-FODMAP diet. We conducted a search on PubMed and MEDLINE by combining the following key terms: “Gut–Brain Axis”, “Irritable Bowel Syndrome”, “Low FODMAP diet”, “Mediterranean Diet”, “Psychopathology”, “Anxiety and Depression”, and “Gut Microbiota”. We applied the following filters: “Clinical Trials”, “Randomized Controlled Trials”, “Reviews”, “Meta-Analyses”, and “Systematic Reviews”. In total, 59 papers were included. Results: Low-FODMAP diet, originally developed to alleviate GI symptoms in IBS, may also positively influence mental health by modulating the GBA and improving the gut microbiota (GM) composition. New insights suggest that combining the low-FODMAP diet with the Mediterranean diet could offer a synergistic effect, enhancing both GI and psychological therapeutic outcomes. Conclusions: Understanding the complex interactions between diet, the GM, and mental health opens new avenues for holistic approaches to managing psychopathology, particularly when linked to GI symptoms.

The role of fibre intake in the management of patients with pancreatic disease is still controversial. In acute pancreatitis, a prebiotic enriched diet is associated with low rates of pancreatic necrosis infection, hospital stay, systemic inflammatory response syndrome and multiorgan failure. This protective effect seems to be connected with the ability of fibre to stabilise the disturbed intestinal barrier homeostasis and to reduce the infection rate. On the other hand, in patients with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency, a high content fibre diet is associated with an increased wet fecal weight and fecal fat excretion because of the fibre inhibition of pancreatic enzymes. The mechanism by which dietary fibre reduces the pancreatic enzyme activity is still not clear. It seems likely that pancreatic enzymes are absorbed on the fibre surface or entrapped in pectin, a gel-like substance, and are likely inactivated by anti-nutrient compounds present in some foods. The aim of the present review is to highlight the current knowledge on the role of fibre in the nutritional management of patients with pancreatic disorders.

Background: Inadequate dietary intake of vitamin D, vitamin K, and calcium, as well as sub-optimal sunlight exposure, can lead to bone loss in the general population, and more so in patients with ulcerative colitis, who are burdened by additional predisposing factors for osteoporosis, such as chronic inflammation and cortisone use. However, micronutrient deficiencies, if present, are easily corrected by nutritional intervention. While the relation between calcium and vitamin D and bone metabolism is well known, fewer data are available for vitamin K, for both healthy individuals and patients. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of recent reports focusing on nutritional deficits relevant to the development of osteoporosis/osteopenia in patients affected by ulcerative colitis. Methods: A systematic electronic search of the English literature up to January 2025 was performed using Medline and the Cochrane Library. Results: Despite being central in bone mineralization, data on dietary calcium intake in ulcerative colitis are relatively scarce, deriving mostly from mixed inflammatory bowel disease cohorts. Although lower than controls, dietary calcium intake approaches the recommended daily allowance, which establishes the necessary daily intake of nutrients. Conversely, vitamin D and vitamin K deficiencies are highly prevalent in ulcerative colitis patients. The widely shared opinion that milk and lactose-containing foods, as well as vegetables, worsen diarrhea is a prime determinant of inadequate vitamin D and vitamin K intake. Conclusions: Increased awareness of the importance of nutrition and the common occurrence of nutritional deficits represents the first step for the development of dietary intervention strategies to counteract the increased risk of osteoporosis in ulcerative colitis patients.

Lactose malabsorption (LM) refers to the incomplete absorption of lactose in the small intestine, resulting in the arrival of ingested lactose in the colon, which can give rise to symptoms defined as lactose intolerance (LI). The lactose breath test (LBT), thanks to its low cost, availability, and noninvasiveness, is the most used diagnostic method. However, the LBT is a tedious tool, requiring prolonged involvement of patients, qualified staff, and infrastructure, of which the most time-consuming factor is the frequency and number of breath samples needed. Objectives: To simplify the current LBT methodology, compliant with the current guidelines’ statements, by reducing the test duration or the number of breath samples, without compromising the test’s accuracy. Methods: The results of the standard LBT were compared with two simplified tests: a “shortened” test, lasting three hours, with samples taken every 30 min; and a “five-sample” test, lasting four hours, with samples taken every hour. Patients were stratified into three grades of malabsorption (mild, moderate, severe) based on the amount of gas exhaled. A clinical severity score was introduced to assess the clinical relevance of LI using a specific questionnaire. Results: Among the 543 patients enrolled (F 71.5%, mean age 43.7 ± 17.6 yrs), 60.4% (328/543) tested positive for LM. A total of 70.5% (383/543) presented LI, with 32.1% of those being true intolerants (LI without LM). The shortened test demonstrated an accuracy of 93.9%, with a sensitivity of 89.9% and a false negative rate of 10.1% (33/328). The five-sample test showed higher accuracy and sensitivity than the shortened test (96.5% and 94.2%, respectively; p = 0.03) with a false negative rate of 5.8% (19/328). Of the 19 false negatives in the five-sample test, 95% (18/19) were categorized as mild malabsorbents. No statistical correlation was found between the clinical severity score and LBT results. Conclusions: The five-sample test, involving hourly breath measurements, is a reliable option for simplifying the LBT without significantly reducing the procedure’s sensitivity.