OBJECTIVE: Inadequate sun exposure impairs vitamin D activity and favors low bone density, especially in patients at increased risk for osteoporosis, such as those affected by inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this study, sun exposure was investigated in a large series of patients with IBD in a Mediterranean country, Italy, where this risk is considered less likely to occur than in higher latitudes.METHODS: This is a case‐control study of 292 patients with IBD [132 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 160 with ulcerative colitis (UC)], 80 diseased and 540 healthy controls, conducted via a validated questionnaire to quantify sunlight exposure. Data were also compared with controls matched by age and gender.RESULTS: In total 78 of the 292 patients with IBD had low, 169 had moderate and 45 had high exposure to sunlight, significantly differing from controls (P < 0.001). The 132 patients with CD were more likely to have abnormal levels of sunlight exposure (49 low, 72 moderate and 11 high) than those with UC (29 low, 97 moderate and 34 high) (P < 0.001). The controls were significantly more exposed to sunlight than both men and women with IBD (P < 0.001 and 0.004, respectively).CONCLUSIONS: IBD patients are significantly less exposed to sunlight than matched controls in Italy, often to an extent that may impair vitamin D activation. Increasing responsible sunlight exposure, thus promoting adequate vitamin D concentrations, may prove beneficial in IBD, in geographical areas in which this risk factor is not generally taken into consideration.

The inadequate dietary intake of Vitamin D and Vitamin K is an easily reversible factor favoring IBD-associated bone loss, but data on Vitamin K are lacking. A 28-item quantitative food frequency questionnaire was administered to 193 IBD patients (89 Crohn’s disease and 104 ulcerative colitis), and 199 controls. Patients’ demographics, clinical and laboratory findings were analyzed in relation to recommended daily allowances. VitD intake was inadequate both in the IBD and control patients (8.3 ± 4.5 µg/day in IBD, 53.1% RDA, and 9.7 ± 5.9 µg/day, 63.2% RDA, respectively). Conversely, the mean ViK intake was less than adequate in IBD, at 116.7 ± 116.3 µg/day (78.7% RDA), and high in controls, at 203.1 ± 166.9 µg/day (138.8% RDA). Nonetheless, due to marked inter-individual differences, diets were severely lacking VitK in 40% of UC and 49% of CD patients, more so in females and those with active disease. The intake of Vit D was non-significantly lower in colitis than that in Crohn’s disease (7.9 vs. 8.7 µg/day). The opposite was observed for VitK (123.5 vs. 107.0 µg/day). Thus, the diet lacks the micronutrients involved in bone wellbeing in a large proportion of IBD patients. While VitD supplementation is the rule, VitK shortages need proactive nutritional intervention.

Background/Aim: Despite the application of colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance guidelines, the detection of early neoplastic lesions might be difficult in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). To explore the risk of post-colonoscopy CRC (PCCRC) in patients with IBD we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patients and Methods: A systematic literature search was performed (PROSPERO; no. CRD42023453049). We included studies reporting the 3-year PCCRC (PCCRC-3y) prevalence, according to World Endoscopy Organization (WEO)-endorsed definition, in IBD and non-IBD patients. As primary outcome we evaluated the PCCRC-3y prevalence, according to WEO definitions, in IBD- and non-IBD patients and calculated the odds ratio (OR). The secondary outcome was to assess risk factors for PCCRC development in IBD patients. Results: Three retrospective observational cohort studies were included. The pooled PCCRC-3y rate in patients with IBD was 30.8% [95% confidence interval (CI)=24.4-37.5%] and in non-IBD patients was 6.8% (95%CI=6.2-7.4%). The PCCRC-3y occurrence in IBD patients was significantly higher than that in non-IBD patients (OR=6.04; 95%CI=4.04-9.4; I²=95%), but a high heterogeneity among studies was noted. Furthermore, patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) had a significantly higher prevalence of PCCRC than patients with Crohn’s Disease (CD): 30.9% (95%CI=27.8-34.2%) vs. 22.3% (95%CI=18-27%), respectively (OR=1.6, 95%CI=1.2-2.2; I²=0%). Conclusion: One-third of CRC in IBD patients were PCCRC, and these numbers were significantly higher when compared with those in non-IBD patients. Furthermore, the prevalence of PCCRC in patients with UC was higher compared to those with CD. However, prospective studies are required to better characterize risk factors for PCCRC development in patients with IBD.

Background/Aims: Endoscopic stenting for stricturing Crohn's disease (CD) is an emerging treatment that achieves more persistent dilatation of the stricture over time than endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD). We aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of stenting for the treatment of CD strictures.Methods: A systematic electronic literature search was performed (PROSPERO; no. CRD42022308033). The primary outcomes were technical success, efficacy, complication rate, and the need for further interventions due to reobstruction. The outcomes of partially covered self-expanding metal stents (PCSEMS) with scheduled retrieval after seven days were also analyzed.Results: Eleven eligible studies were included in the review. Overall, 173 patients with CD were included in this study. Mean percentage of technical success was 95% (range, 80%–100%), short-term efficacy was 100% in all studies, and long-term efficacy was 56% (range, 25%–90%). In patients with a scheduled PCSEMS retrieval, the long-term efficacy was 76% (range, 59%–90%), the mean complication rate was 35% (range, 15%–57%), and the major complication rate was 11% (range, 0%–29%).Conclusions: Endoscopic stenting with scheduled PCSEMS retrieval may be considered a feasible second-line treatment for short CD strictures to postpone surgery. However, larger head-to-head prospective studies are needed to understand the role of stenting as an alternative or additional treatment to EBD in CD.

Background: Inadequate dietary intake of vitamin D, vitamin K, and calcium, as well as sub-optimal sunlight exposure, can lead to bone loss in the general population, and more so in patients with ulcerative colitis, who are burdened by additional predisposing factors for osteoporosis, such as chronic inflammation and cortisone use. However, micronutrient deficiencies, if present, are easily corrected by nutritional intervention. While the relation between calcium and vitamin D and bone metabolism is well known, fewer data are available for vitamin K, for both healthy individuals and patients. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of recent reports focusing on nutritional deficits relevant to the development of osteoporosis/osteopenia in patients affected by ulcerative colitis. Methods: A systematic electronic search of the English literature up to January 2025 was performed using Medline and the Cochrane Library. Results: Despite being central in bone mineralization, data on dietary calcium intake in ulcerative colitis are relatively scarce, deriving mostly from mixed inflammatory bowel disease cohorts. Although lower than controls, dietary calcium intake approaches the recommended daily allowance, which establishes the necessary daily intake of nutrients. Conversely, vitamin D and vitamin K deficiencies are highly prevalent in ulcerative colitis patients. The widely shared opinion that milk and lactose-containing foods, as well as vegetables, worsen diarrhea is a prime determinant of inadequate vitamin D and vitamin K intake. Conclusions: Increased awareness of the importance of nutrition and the common occurrence of nutritional deficits represents the first step for the development of dietary intervention strategies to counteract the increased risk of osteoporosis in ulcerative colitis patients.